If it isn't supposed to be active for backgrounded apps or apps that are streaming audio, why wouldn't you be looking at the screen when it is active?
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Attempts to Ease Concerns Over Wi-Fi Assist Data Usage
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
If it isn't supposed to be active for backgrounded apps or apps that are streaming audio, why wouldn't you be looking at the screen when it is active?
The problem with this method is, most users are not tech-kosher. They simply panic whenever any unexpected dialog comes up. Because of the panic, they get nothing from the dialog even if the language is plain enough for them to fully understand under a different circumstance.
There are people who didn't know about this wi-fi assist. There are people with limited data. Therefore...they probably overused their data with excessive fee. Back in 9.0, it was AUTOMATICALLY ON. It wouldn't have been a problem if it was off in the first place.
They already do have an indicator. It's the three big letters that say "LTE" in place of the wifi icon.
(Sorry for the snark, but I just can't believe how big an issue people are making of this.)
Not arguing either way. Just providing a solution to a current problem. Enjoy.
I guess. If you're like me & take 3 hour road trips with 4 devices going in the car, 30gb (ATT double deal) Family Plan it is then...
Has it really been a problem specifically though? Has it been conclusively shown that those who had more data usage had it because of that in particular and not something else?
Probably because they want it to be more a default way of how WiFi/cellular interchange works, as it has already been like that on Android and other platforms for some time--basically they are enhancing the way it all works by default while providing the ability for someone to disable that enhancement if they really don't want it for some reason. I mean it could be thought of them simply tweaking how the existing handoff works to have it be more sensitive and change over to cellular earlier than it has before, all without even providing any user options related to it. That's not to say it's good or bad or right or wrong, but basically to provide potential reasoning that might have been applied to the approach they took.
How is that different than the already existing WiFi or cellular indicators? Are those also not useful then because they are in the status bar?
This is extremely reckless of Apple. They make it on by default and if you turn it off and later do "Reset All Settings", it will be set back on. It should be off by default.
And I'll also tell my parents that they should have read the release notes when they go over their cap just like many of you practical people seem to do.
And I'll also tell my parents that they should have read the release notes when they go over their cap just like many of you practical people seem to do.
You don't need data for this. This is common sense. It's a problem for those who don't know much about iOS 9 stuff. It happened to me 10 gb over as an example. Just because it's not a problem for YOU, doesn't mean there aren't people out there with this problem...and not know about it till later.
Clearly that's not what I was talking about at all. I'm saying has it been shown that that particular functionality is what is responsible for data overages that some people are having. Just saying that it could be doesn't really mean that it is.
There are almost always (at least for the past few years) threads and articles of people running into more data usage after upgrading to a new iOS and/or getting a new device, yet this option didn't exist in previous years, so it couldn't have been responsible in those cases. What does common sense say about that? Thus the question, has it actually been shown that that's what's behind it all in these cases, or just simply theorized that it could be.
People in Canada pay about 100 bucks after tax for a gig of data and a phone plan
Are there really bums out there driving Chevy Cavaliers? Buy a new car, bum! It's just money!
/s
theres got to be more to the story here, not aware of any carrier that low in the US
From Apple's help website (https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT205296)
"When Wi-Fi Assist is activated, you'll see the cellular data icon in the status bar on your device."
But if that is the case, then how is it really different from before and why are all these people going over data usage? Especially those of us who are tech savvy. We all notice when that icon switches over or more often doesn't when the wifi signal is low. My phone has always held onto the wifi in my house and other locations way too long as I'm driving away, so my maps and other things won't update as I'm planning my route for the day. Is this just apple trying to kill the wifi earlier than the phone naturally wants to?
And that's exactly it. All they did is made things somewhat more sensitive as to when to switch over to cellular vs. staying on non-functional WiFi--basically it can be seen as an improvement in an already existing algorithm that deals with that. There's nothing really nefarious or misleading going on there, and in fact they even offered an option to disable that improvement instead of just making it part of the existing one that no one ever had any control over anyway.
Who would want to have the less cautious option on by default? I really don't see an argument for this being the standard option. If it wasn't that way before, it shouldn't change without a reasonable notification, especially when it's dealing with something as important as the phone bill. My family was having data overages before this feature even came around, so why would we say "Hey, let's enable this feature than can potentially use more data"?
I'm getting tired of people on MacRumors who have this attitude of "I don't have a problem, therefore the problem doesn't exist". We get it, it doesn't affect you. You are one iPhone user out of hundreds of millions. And have you ever even had a data overage of your own?
What I'm saying is that they had an algorithm that they defined the tolerance in before without any control of it that anyone aside from them. They likely tweaked that algorithm to make it better in different releases without it creating some sort of an issue or much of a discussion. This is basically pretty much a similar thing where they tweaked some more it but provided a control to disable that tweak if someone wants to. They feel that the tweaks they made are an improvement and in past releases were just there under the hood by default without anyone even knowing, this time they just gave it a user setting instead of just doing it like they have more than likely done many times before.
I never said anything about not having a problem or that others are not having a problem, so I'm not sure why any of that is even coming up in relation to what I'm talking about. I'm simply talking about what was changed and what the likely approach was to it. And also wondering what issues any of this has actually caused vs. what people think it might have caused (given that there have almost always been reports of some users seeing higher data usage after getting new major iOS updates and/or new iOS devices).
Wi-Fi Assist doesn't even work, in my experience. I have a decent data plan so I would LIKE it to work, but I'm still getting hung up on weak Wi-Fi signals as I walk around the city. Starbucks here, campus Wi-Fi there, etc. It's incredibly annoying.
I got this notification just as I was arguing over this. Do you think WiFi Assist looks appetizing to me right now?
(There is actually a 6GB allowance on the account, too. 3GB plan with an additional 3GB bonus for the 3 iPhone 6 devices purchased last year. Once the 3GB promotional is used, it starts using the 3GB plan allowance.)
(There is actually a 6GB allowance on the account, too. 3GB plan with an additional 3GB bonus for the 3 iPhone 6 devices purchased last year. Once the 3GB promotional is used, it starts using the 3GB plan allowance.)
