Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The AAPL "House of Cards" will, @ some point, come tumbling down !

NOT many iPhone X units have been sold the past 100 days ! ... less than 10M units !!

You don't need to finish each sentence with exclamation marks, fyi. Takes away any credibility.


Plus it reminds me of a certain someone who loves exclamation marks.
 
Not when you are leading and encouraging a team of engineers who are designing expensive products and subpar software. Just look at the iOS 11 and MacOS High Sierra fiasco.

Another poster on this thread is right. They are sometimes more involved in getting their extra penny than refining and testing their products.
Do you forget the launch of apple maps and antenna gate? Steve wasnt perfect either. Take off the rose tinted glasses.
 
I’m sure he’s not a fan of yours anyway.

He’s every company’s dream CEO. Haters are going to hate.
No he's not. That's ludicrous. Just because he might be good at Apple doesn't mean he'd be good everywhere.
 
iOS 5 was so slow on the iPhone 4 and iOS 6 was a dumpster fire on it. People cite iOS 7 as killing the IP4 but it was already dead on iOS 6. If people got that sort of performance these days in just 2 generations of OS updates they would be raging.
You have to understand that early-on, iOS devices were barely able to run the software they originally shipped with at a decent speed. Any increase in resource-consumption from a newer OS version resulted in a noticeable slowdown.

That's not a problem we face as much today, as increasingly devices are released with performance to spare for later and more-demanding OS versions.

Having said that, I have iOS 6 running on an iPod touch 4, and it doesn't feel slow to me despite the device only having 256 MB RAM.
 
Not at all. The only thing is that... it could have been worse. Apple just got better in marketing and moving the money. A total fails in innovation, support and everything else. Basically, they heritage some assets and they have been milking those assets to death.

Yet the customer satisfaction rates disprove your argument. Go figure.
[doublepost=1533838747][/doublepost]
Ah, but a classic story needs to be retold. 54 times according to your post history.

Here are some highlights:






But the real question is whether or not you're a fan of Tim Cook… o_O

I’d say the real question is whether the poster is Scott Forstall or John Sculley, and if neither who he/she would prefer in the CEO position that would have actually succeeded.
 
Not at all. The only thing is that... it could have been worse. Apple just got better in marketing and moving the money. A total fails in innovation, support and everything else. Basically, they heritage some assets and they have been milking those assets to death.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. "Milk" it to the tune of $1 Trillion market cap. Apple is currently ranked number one in customer satisfaction for Smartphones: http://resolve.jdpower.com/business...Service-Smartphone-Satisfaction-Study/1982ENG
Laptop customer support: https://www.laptopmag.com/articles/tech-support-showdown
And overall personal computing customer satisfaction: https://www.theacsi.org/index.php?o...atid=&Itemid=214&c=Apple&i=Personal+Computers
 
I really miss Steve. He was just such a special person. I don’t think there’s been another CEO would could connect so well with their audience ever. Apple was his baby and he always made sure that everything they were putting out was the absolute best they had to offer. Keynotes have never been the same since except for the anomaly of the introduction of the 15” retina MBP. But anyone could’ve gotten the audience freaking out with a product that beautiful and amazing for its time.

The first time I saw the Retina display on the iPhone 4 I was really blown away. So much that when I opened my iPad 2 I was bummed out that it didn’t have that same crisp display quality. When I saw the 15” mid-2012 rMBP in the store, it was drool worthy! 5,040,000 sexy pixels putting every 1080p TV to shame!
 
  • Like
Reactions: clauzzz203
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. "Milk" it to the tune of $1 Trillion market cap. Apple is currently ranked number one in customer satisfaction for Smartphones: http://resolve.jdpower.com/business...Service-Smartphone-Satisfaction-Study/1982ENG
Laptop customer support: https://www.laptopmag.com/articles/tech-support-showdown
And overall personal computing customer satisfaction: https://www.theacsi.org/index.php?o...atid=&Itemid=214&c=Apple&i=Personal+Computers

Likewise, let's look at it from the other side of the fence:

https://9to5mac.com/2018/04/20/apple-7th-place-laptop-review/
https://www.businessinsider.com/apple-iphone-x-early-adopters-siri-satisfaction-2018-4
https://www.statista.com/statistics/703823/satisfaction-with-the-customer-service-of-apple/

Case in point... surveys are just surveys and should not be used as the only supporting information.
 
What do you think would have happened if Cook took over Apple when it was near bankruptcy in the late 1990s?

Was that a rhetorical question to comment that Steve Jobs and Tim Cook are different? No duh. But its the rare company where the founders make good CEO's for the long run. Steve is the starter. Tim is the long run. Business 101. If Steve had lived he ultimately for the good fo the company would have stepped down to be tinkerer emmeritus. It would have been glorious. But it was not meant to be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kaibelf
A lot of Jobs backpatting too, who remains a failure as a father.

As a human being, Tim Cook is far ahead of Jobs.
You forget Steve Jobs returned to Apple when the company was failing.

It was Steve Jobs foresight and endless quest for perfection and innovation that saved Apple whilst putting the consumer first.

Without Steve Jobs Apple would be nothing and possibly not even be in existence. Tim Cook does not possess that foresight as Tim Cook's Apple is all about the shareholder.

This is not hate speech. It is the TRUTH.
 
Was that a rhetorical question to comment that Steve Jobs and Tim Cook are different? No duh. But its the rare company where the founders make good CEO's for the long run. Steve is the starter. Tim is the long run. Business 101. If Steve had lived he ultimately for the good fo the company would have stepped down to be tinkerer emmeritus. It would have been glorious. But it was not meant to be.

THIS exactly. Microsoft is doing far more now with Bill Gates in the background and Ballmer out of the way, with someone with a longer view in charge. Would TC be better if SJ was alive? Who knows? Sure, a guiding hand would have been nice for Tim, but I think SJ did everything he possibly could to prepare him for doing the job on his own. In a way, Tim is Steve's legacy as much as anything else.
 
It makes me happy that Steve Jobs was able to see this happen in his lifetime.

But I also admittedly question how I can be happy for someone who denied being the father of his first-born daughter for quite a while. It's a shame.
If he thought she wasn't his, why wouldn't he deny it?
 
You forget Steve Jobs returned to Apple when the company was failing.

It was Steve Jobs foresight and endless quest for perfection and innovation that saved Apple whilst putting the consumer first.

Without Steve Jobs Apple would be nothing and possibly not even be in existence. Tim Cook does not possess that foresight as Tim Cook's Apple is all about the shareholder.

This is not hate speech. It is the TRUTH.

Actually, your post is largely CONJECTURE.
 
THIS exactly. Microsoft is doing far more now with Bill Gates in the background and Ballmer out of the way, with someone with a longer view in charge. Would TC be better if SJ was alive? Who knows? Sure, a guiding hand would have been nice for Tim, but I think SJ did everything he possibly could to prepare him for doing the job on his own. In a way, Tim is Steve's legacy as much as anything else.
Without Steve Jobs Apple would be nothing same as without Bill Gates Microsoft would be nothing. Both Being the founders of their respective companies. Although I am not a massive Tim Cook fan I have a lot more respect for him compared to Steve Ballmer an utter buffoon who ridiculed both the MacBook Air and the iPhone and was clearly mentally unstable

Steve Jobs and Bill Gates also had the utmost respect for each other
 
Last edited:
You forget Steve Jobs returned to Apple when the company was failing.

It was Steve Jobs foresight and endless quest for perfection and innovation that saved Apple whilst putting the consumer first.

Without Steve Jobs Apple would be nothing and possibly not even be in existence. Tim Cook does not possess that foresight as Tim Cook's Apple is all about the shareholder.

This is not hate speech. It is the TRUTH.

To me that means nothing if you’ve failed your children as a father
 
Man, you really have that much forum time that you went through his post history to find this?
Haha, I wondered if somebody would ask. :D The real question is how long do you think it takes to type a couple of keywords into a text box and browse the results? Because it only takes me a minute.
 
It makes me happy that Steve Jobs was able to see this happen in his lifetime.

But I also admittedly question how I can be happy for someone who denied being the father of his first-born daughter for quite a while. It's a shame.
When this topic (Steve not accepting that he was the father of his first-born daughter) comes up, I sometimes wonder if Steve's own experience (being put up for adoption by his biological parents) played a part in him not accepting the fact that he was the father of his first-born daughter.
 
When this topic (Steve not accepting that he was the father of his first-born daughter) comes up, I sometimes wonder if Steve's own experience (being put up for adoption by his biological parents) played a part in him not accepting the fact that he was the father of his first-born daughter.

Read his biography. I'm pretty sure he says it did, or implies it at least.
[doublepost=1533846132][/doublepost]
To me that means nothing if you’ve failed your children as a father

Ok one thing is being a father and another being a CEO of a company, stop mixing both! Steve Jobs had abandonment issues, so he found it extremely hard to deal with having his first child. He was a pretty good father for the rest of his children, by the way. Again, if you are going to speak about his private/family life, at least read his biography which goes in great depth about his childhood, teenage and young adult years. Extremely interesting.
 
gotta stop using "market cap" as a benchmark for a companies "Value"


there's no real world relevance to it. Apple itself is not worth on it's own balance sheets as market cap since market cap implies future estimation based on the Trading of it's stock.

it's cool if you're an investor and has relevance if you trade. But for Apple itself AND us as consumer, Market cap is completely, utterly irrelevant and meaningless
Wah, someone sounds salty lol. Get over it
 
Do you know another way to gauge customer satisfaction with what they have purchased other than by surveying them? I didn't just use surveys. There's also the fact of the first U.S. company to a trillion dollar market capitalization. A corpoartion that makes products and offers services can't achieve that unless consumers in droves are buying the products and services.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.