They all can, apparently, but you need to hack some .plists and it’s finicky.I am not aware of any eGPUs currently which accelerate the internal display.
They all can, apparently, but you need to hack some .plists and it’s finicky.I am not aware of any eGPUs currently which accelerate the internal display.
one thing that always bugged me... can these egpu use the macbook display, or they require an external monitor? if the latter... meh.
I think the new HDMI 2.1 supports 4k freezync, Now even it was capped if it could do 4k at 75 that would be pretty good, sure no cap would be betterNo Display Port which means FreeSync would potentially be capped at 75hz on a 1080p monitor (from AMD's site).
This enclosure is useless.
Will this work with a G4 Cube? I don't have one, but still, I am very curious.
The 85W is what it takes to power a MacBook Pro, so with one cable you can have eGPU acceleration, power, HDMI output, daisy chaining another Thunderbolt 3 device, and use USB-A ports. Pretty incredible!I wonder how this will work with new mac mini?
[doublepost=1531404009][/doublepost]
I think this refers to USB power...
GPUs are still pretty expensive. The RX 580 started at $230, but the best I've seen it recently is around $300 and I've seen it around $500 as well. I'm not entirely defending the price of that eGPU, but GPUs are still pretty expensive. And enclosures themselves usually cost around $300.$699.00 for an AMD 580? Ouch. Hard to justify over an iMac, unless you absolutely need a mobile workstation that’s dockable. Fewer dongles with an iMac as well...
Either way, still sitting here impatiently waiting for this new Mac Pro.
[doublepost=1531425547][/doublepost]Yes, PLEASE give us an Nvidia GPU. In my area of science, structural biology, most people use Macs but we all need CUDA support to do serious work. Please, please give us a 1080Ti or some such!!!
Apple.com today gained a new and exclusive external GPU aimed at the MacBook Pro, called the Blackmagic eGPU. According to TechCrunch, the unit's appearance exclusively on Apple's website comes in the wake of a partnership between the two companies as Apple aims to widen the eGPU market after launching support for eGPUs this past spring.
Running for $699.00, the Blackmagic eGPU provides desktop-class graphics performance on a MacBook Pro, through a Radeon Pro 580 graphics processor with 8GB of GDDR5 memory. The accessory connects via Thunderbolt 3, includes two Thunderbolt 3 ports, four USB 3.0 ports, one HDMI 2.0 port, and 85W power delivery. A Thunderbolt 3 cable also comes in the box.
![]()
With external GPUs, users can take advantage of smoother gaming experiences, boost graphics-intensive app workflows, enable virtual reality experiences, and even build VR content. Apple leaned into virtual reality as a selling point of eGPUs following the announcement of eGPU support at WWDC 2017, offering eGPU enclosures to developers who want to work on graphically intensive VR applications and games that run on macOS.
Those interested can purchase the Blackmagic eGPU today for $699.00, and the first units are expected to arrive in two days, on Saturday, July 14. Order pickup is also available at nearby Apple retail stores.
Article Link: Apple Begins Exclusively Selling 'Blackmagic eGPU' for $699, Aimed at New MacBook Pros
Here's a neat alternative: https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814932055&cm_re=rx_580-_-14-932-055-_-Product
$200 less than Apple's new solution and with four display connections, three of which are Displayport.
Clueless "Anonymous" reviewer should be ignored as I'm using the same eGPU on a 2011 MBP.Complete with a one-star review that complains it is not even remotely Mac compatible! That's some alternative, huh?
I'm pretty sure you can put an Nvidia GPU into the enclosure. If not, then just buy an eGPU enclosure by itself without the GPU.Dumb. And useless.![]()
Nope, Nvidia is terrible at Mac drivers. AMD shines. Cuda is still widely popular but only works with Nvidia. Radeon is retaking the market, strategically has better mid and mid-high range, better eGPU support, better Linux and macOS support. in Mac land, Metal will become more important every year, Cuda will become less important. Blame Nvidia for terrible metal and macOS drivers. eGPU are Radeon based, also on Windows thanks to XConnect.Ok, now make one with nVidia so I can use cuda like a normal modern person uses.
You are just trolling. eGPU is an incredible handy tech for PROs, high end users and gamers too. Power, dedicated GPU, connectivity with one cable. I get 6x performance thanks to eGPU.Dumb. And useless.![]()
It runs quite similar ut has better performance in Metal and OpenCL. Also macOS drivers are very good, compared to Nvidia. Yes eGPU box cost quite a lot, but it is like having PCI express eternal, you need ventilation, power delivery and also gives you many port and connectivity. It is not for everyone, but calling trash a really great solution is ap roof you don't understand its use our you are close minded "Nvidia only" which is not true since more than a year. And even if you are blind Nvidia fan, sadly you should blame them.God, Apple hardware is pitiful. $700 for a GPU that costs under $300... so $400 for a case? The thing is garbage too, makes more sense to get a Nvidia 1070 which consumes less power and runs faster.
You mean OpenGL or forcing everything. Metal and OpenCl accelerate any display by default.They all can, apparently, but you need to hack some .plists and it’s finicky.
The ignorance of IT hardware still in 2018 complaining about this price is staggering. The 2TB3/4USB3 ports, 85W USB power and HDMI 2.0 certified with OS X and Metal 2 API hastle free is well worth this price.
Ummmmm.....
Let’s think this through, shall we?
Does the G4 Cube have a TB3 connection to plug it in? No.
Does it have TB2 connection so you could use an adapter & use it at a lower speed? No.
Does it have USB3 or even USB2 to connect, were that even an option (which it is NOT)? No.
Does it support 2018’s macOS “Mojave”, necessary to run an eGPU? No. (topped out w/ 2005’s OS X “Tiger”)
So- a resounding no, all the way around.
External monitor only.one thing that always bugged me... can these egpu use the macbook display, or they require an external monitor? if the latter... meh.
Are you sure? Someone on one of these forums told me external only, which would prevent me from using it with my iMac.You can plug it right into your MBP without the use of an external monitor.
Apple.com today gained a new and exclusive external GPU aimed at the MacBook Pro, called the Blackmagic eGPU. According to TechCrunch, the unit's appearance exclusively on Apple's website comes in the wake of a partnership between the two companies as Apple aims to widen the eGPU market after launching support for eGPUs this past spring.
Running for $699.00, the Blackmagic eGPU provides desktop-class graphics performance on a MacBook Pro, through a Radeon Pro 580 graphics processor with 8GB of GDDR5 memory. The accessory connects via Thunderbolt 3, includes two Thunderbolt 3 ports, four USB 3.0 ports, one HDMI 2.0 port, and 85W power delivery. A Thunderbolt 3 cable also comes in the box.
![]()
With external GPUs, users can take advantage of smoother gaming experiences, boost graphics-intensive app workflows, enable virtual reality experiences, and even build VR content. Apple leaned into virtual reality as a selling point of eGPUs following the announcement of eGPU support at WWDC 2017, offering eGPU enclosures to developers who want to work on graphically intensive VR applications and games that run on macOS.
Those interested can purchase the Blackmagic eGPU today for $699.00, and the first units are expected to arrive in two days, on Saturday, July 14. Order pickup is also available at nearby Apple retail stores.
Article Link: Apple Begins Exclusively Selling 'Blackmagic eGPU' for $699, Aimed at New MacBook Pros
I think this is a fair analysis. Recall, for Pro's (whatever that means---I know it's not me), this is an incredibly versatile solution for the problem of a lack of Mac Pro or other high end hardware.Nope, Nvidia is terrible at Mac drivers. AMD shines. Cuda is still widely popular but only works with Nvidia. Radeon is retaking the market, strategically has better mid and mid-high range, better eGPU support, better Linux and macOS support. in Mac land, Metal will become more important every year, Cuda will become less important. Blame Nvidia for terrible metal and macOS drivers. eGPU are Radeon based, also on Windows thanks to XConnect.
[doublepost=1531433882][/doublepost]
You are just trolling. eGPU is an incredible handy tech for PROs, high end users and gamers too. Power, dedicated GPU, connectivity with one cable. I get 6x performance thanks to eGPU.
[doublepost=1531434106][/doublepost]
It runs quite similar ut has better performance in Metal and OpenCL. Also macOS drivers are very good, compared to Nvidia. Yes eGPU box cost quite a lot, but it is like having PCI express eternal, you need ventilation, power delivery and also gives you many port and connectivity. It is not for everyone, but calling trash a really great solution is ap roof you don't understand its use our you are close minded "Nvidia only" which is not true since more than a year. And even if you are blind Nvidia fan, sadly you should blame them.
[doublepost=1531434188][/doublepost]
You mean OpenGL or forcing everything. Metal and OpenCl accelerate any display by default.
Many of us dislike Windows. Personally, I use a Mac for the software and interoperability with iOS devices. Because of that, Windows is a non-starter for me.Meanwhile for $700, I got an MSI gaming laptop with a GTX 1050, which surpasses the eGPU's performance in every way. It even has USB-A ports, an SD card reader, USB-C, and an Ethernet port for low latency! Don't even get me started on the wonderful keyboard which gives satisfying feedback when typing!
Apple is just milking you users. When will you realise that? There is a PC or laptop for every kind of user. Take the leap and you will find that you were being fed lies by Apple.
(Pardon grammatical errors, if any. Non-native English speaker).
it like all other thunderolt 3 e-gpus that work with mac will work with any thunderbolt mac 2011+ if you use the thunderbolt 2 to thunderbolt 3 adapter.2016 and above.
Will this work at all with a 2015 MBP? The throttling issues with the M370X are insane and even being limited by Thunderbolt2 will be better than that.
edit: answer is "no".