The Ventura feature still works regardless of how the iPhone is mounted.Why not use a cheap tripod instead? It's way more flexible.
Would this work?
The Belkin mount is just an accessory to mount it on the top of a computer display.
The Ventura feature still works regardless of how the iPhone is mounted.Why not use a cheap tripod instead? It's way more flexible.
Would this work?
Yup, but not as convenient, especially while traveling.Why not use a cheap tripod instead? It's way more flexible.
Would this work?
yep - agreed.I also use the Brio 4K, I think the quality is 'decent' but still rather noisy. The nice thing is that my Brio is semi-permanently mounted. I'm not sure how much of a pain it will be to messing around taking the iPhone on/off a fixed monitor.
I'm intrigued by the Continuity camera concept, but that mount doesn't look like it will fit on top of the Apple Studio Display.
Maybe this is better suited for mostly-MacBook users on-the-go that want a nicer webcam, then they put the phone back in their pocket when done? I'd want the quality and macOS convenience in something that was essentially permanently mounted on a monitor.
Yeah I can't justify an entirely separate iPhone to be my webcam, even though I'm on camera for several hours a day.yep - agreed.
Overall, it's a nice thing in the beginning - to be honest, I used it a couple of times on an improvised tripod
I always fall back to the convenience of having the integrated camera from the laptop or the brio already mounted and 1 pulg-away.
In the end, everyone has quite crappy cameras during the video calls. I believe high quality conferencing cameras should be a standard nowadays...
While I appreciate Apple's gesture here, I don't fancy using a device which costs 1600 EUR (iPhone 14 Pro Max) as a webcam.
I am waiting for someone to raise the bar here in terms of the sensors and not do video processing gimmicks or attach a phone to the back of the laptop.
If you think about it - it sounds weird, doesn't it?![]()
I answer my phone on my Apple Watch, iPad Pro or desktop!It's all fun and games until my phone rings. ️![]()
Yeah I agree.Yeah I can't justify an entirely separate iPhone to be my webcam, even though I'm on camera for several hours a day.
I've been very tempted by the Opal Camera, and even got an invite a while ago. But if it's not substantially better than the Brio 4K (and probably not as a good as an iPhone via Continuity camera), it's a pretty expensive experiment at $300 USD.
Sad that we've gone BACK to the original iSight camera concept/product use case after 12 yrs.Just use duct tape.
People might pay so others can look at their hands and crotch with the desk view.Paying $30 to put a 8.5 oz (240 g) weight on my notebook lid?
No thanks.
If only there were a way to not use it.This is beyond stupid..
It doesn’t work well. I have a third party version of this, and my 14 Pro Max pulls the screen of my M2 Air all the way back if I don’t have the screen basically vertical.How am i supposed to mount a heavy 13pro on my m1 macbook air with that thin bezel??
The built-in cameras on most Macs (save the 14/16 MacBook Pros) are pretty much garbage.
And you can't really use your phone as the main camera/device for work-related things. People (or you!) are presenting material, you can really use your phone and stay on camera.
For work purposes, if you're using a bad camera, it's essentially a sign of unprofessionalism. Given the poor lighting of most peoples' home office set-ups, people need all the help they can get out of their camera.
I suppose those do make a bit more sense. Just seems like a step backwards.iPhone cameras are far higher quality and you can use subject tracking to stay centered as you move around.
Get a selfie stick you can also use as a stand and put it behind the MacBook Pro.I'm afraid it's going to scratch my Macbook Pro. Too afraid to use it no matter what materials Belkin Mount is using.
Like Apple said in their keynote, peoples' iPhone cameras are usually the best camera they own. At least we now have an 'officially supported' way to use that for a real-world use case (video calls).I suppose those do make a bit more sense. Just seems like a step backwards.