So this is Kensington basically saying to insurers 'without these, you shouldn't let people claim because they haven't secured their stuff!' Why would anyone ever support a company who does this? They're creating a false sense of security and profiting from you over it. Just use security cameras and door locks, they're actually useful.It's entirely likely that for insurance purposes companies are obliged to lock hardware down.
I've been issued dozens of Kensington locks over the last 30 years and have never seen one prevent a theft, but I expect Kensington continues to lobby the insurance industry to convince them these locks prevent loss and should be required by the terms of insurance policies.
These days with empty office spaces, there are endless opportunities to walk into a building and walk out with displays, computers etc. I was in one of our buildings the other day and was the only person on a floor with hundreds of 27" displays on VESA mounts sitting at empty desks. Every one of them had a lock which would be easy to defeat, but likely required for an insurance claim.
And when a computer that fits in a small bag can run $8000 USD (maxed out Studio) I can see the value in locking them up as futile as the lock may be.
Apple didn't even secure things in their retail stores properly. 5 years after leaving their employ, they still haven't asked for the security key back or changed the alarms. Apple don't care for these, and you shouldn't either. Hell, they didn't even iCloud lock devices in the store I worked at! Lazy bums.