Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Passive Thunderbolt 3 cables like Apple's standard version are limited to shorter lengths of less than a meter, as they are unable to maintain maximum speeds over longer lengths. Active electronics in the cable connectors are required for longer-length cables, which adds significantly to the cost. Even so, Apple's Thunderbolt 3 Pro Cable carries a price premium over many other active cables, including an $80 Belkin one also carried by Apple.

The Belkin cable doesn’t support USB 3.0, though (just USB 2.0 or Thunderbolt). If the Apple cable does, then it has more functionality.
[automerge]1592933333[/automerge]
It’s overpriced, but it’s not as overpriced as I thought. Although you can get the same thing on Amazon for $60-$75.
[automerge]1592913587[/automerge]


Can you explain? On the surface it advertises the exact same data transfer speeds.
The Belkin cable cannot send a USB 3.0 signal when connected to an ordinary USB-C port. The Apple cable does. It can also send DisplayPort over USB-C.
 
Last edited:
This is what I hate about Apple, they say they're all about making insanely great products, yet when push comes to shove, they seem to be more about making insanely great profits.
1) Except Apple’s profits aren’t all that high, are they? Apple for many years has made exactly what they’re still making—about 20% net profit.

Microsoft’s was about 35% last time I checked.

2) Apples prices are high because their expenses are high. They spend $1.5 billion a month in R&D alone.

Is this really so hard to understand?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: KPOM
Using the CalDigit 2m active cable for $50 for a year now for my eGPU without any issues.
If all you need is TB3, then that cable is fine. This one is also capable of sending USB 3.0 and DisplayPort signals outside of the Thunderbolt 3 protocol.
[automerge]1592943615[/automerge]
LOL, Tim Cook loves people who without batting an eyelash pony up their money 😅 and spend 129 dollars on a cable. Its your money if you want to buy it, great, as for me I will continue to offer my unadulterated opinion and call out Apple if in my opinion they're wrong and they're wrong here

It’s pricey, but it’s also one of the few 2 meter cables on the market that supports Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.0, and DisplayPort through USB-C. Apple also offers the Belkin cable for those who don’t need USB 3.0 or DisplayPort. This cable could be useful for someone who wants to use a 5K display with both a TB3-equipped Mac and a USB-C-equipped iPad or Windows PC. LG supplies separate cables with their 5K display (a 2M TB3-only cable, and a 1M USB-C-only cable for MacBooks and the iPad Pro). This is more convenient, albeit at a cost.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: canhaz and dz5b609


Apple has quietly started selling its 2-meter Thunderbolt 3 cable priced at $129, offering a braided design and active cable technology that supports full Thunderbolt 3 data transfer speeds of up to 40Gb/s. This marks the first time the cable has been available as a standalone purchase, as it is otherwise only available included with the Pro Display XDR.

thunderbolt_3_pro_cable.jpg

Passive Thunderbolt 3 cables like Apple's standard version are limited to shorter lengths of less than a meter, as they are unable to maintain maximum speeds over longer lengths. Active electronics in the cable connectors are required for longer-length cables, which adds significantly to the cost. Even so, Apple's Thunderbolt 3 Pro Cable carries a price premium over many other active cables, including an $80 Belkin one also carried by Apple.

Lengths beyond two or three meters require optical cables that are even more expensive, and optical Thunderbolt 3 cables are only just now starting to come to market with prices starting at several hundred dollars.

Article Link: Apple Begins Selling Standalone 2-Meter Thunderbolt 3 Pro Cable for $129
Now THAT's a Bargain!
 
Guys.. guys.... guys... wasn't the point of going to one standard cable so that you didn't need to buy and spend so much money on all these specialized cables... like a $15.99 DVI or DP cable... $14 USB cables, $10 HDMI cables, ... and now I just need to have one of these standardized cables for each....
 
  • Like
Reactions: dysamoria
Intel announced Thunderbolt 3 would be a royalty-free standard over three years ago.

Fulfilling its 2017 promise to make Thunderbolt 3 royalty-free, Intel has given the specification for its high-speed interconnect to the USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF), the industry group that develops the USB specification. The USB-IF has taken the spec and will use it to form the basis of USB4, the next iteration of USB following USB 3.2.

So a promise for the future in 2017, which was delivered in 2019 to go into the next version of the standard... pretty sure they’re right and you’re being misleading at best
 
Guys.. guys.... guys... wasn't the point of going to one standard cable so that you didn't need to buy and spend so much money on all these specialized cables... like a $15.99 DVI or DP cable... $14 USB cables, $10 HDMI cables, ... and now I just need to have one of these standardized cables for each....
0.8 meter Thunderbolt 3 cables are fairly cheap. But copper isn’t good at delivering signal at 40 GB/s for longer lengths, which is why the 2 meter cables are more expensive.
 
Intel announced Thunderbolt 3 would be a royalty-free standard over three years ago.

And yet it still isn't. So you got an expensive active cable to make, get certified with expensive machines and then having to pay expensive license fees. This probably is one of the least profitable products for Apple.
 
It’s pricey, but it’s also one of the few 2 meter cables on the market that supports Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.0, and DisplayPort through USB-C. Apple also offers the Belkin cable for those who don’t need USB 3.0 or DisplayPort. This cable could be useful for someone who wants to use a 5K display with both a TB3-equipped Mac and a USB-C-equipped iPad or Windows PC. LG supplies separate cables with their 5K display (a 2M TB3-only cable, and a 1M USB-C-only cable for MacBooks and the iPad Pro). This is more convenient, albeit at a cost.

Yes, it would really be convenient to only use a single cable to connect both my MacBook Pro or iPad Pro to the LG 5K. Swapping USB C and Thunderbolt every time is kind of a PITA first world problem. Just wished LG would have shipped a plain vanilla USB C/Thunderbolt cable instead.
 
Yes, it would really be convenient to only use a single cable to connect both my MacBook Pro or iPad Pro to the LG 5K. Swapping USB C and Thunderbolt every time is kind of a PITA first world problem. Just wished LG would have shipped a plain vanilla USB C/Thunderbolt cable instead.
Yes, even the 0.8m Apple Thunderbolt 3 cable would have been better with the new model.
 
Fulfilling its 2017 promise to make Thunderbolt 3 royalty-free, Intel has given the specification for its high-speed interconnect to the USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF), the industry group that develops the USB specification. The USB-IF has taken the spec and will use it to form the basis of USB4, the next iteration of USB following USB 3.2.

So a promise for the future in 2017, which was delivered in 2019 to go into the next version of the standard... pretty sure they’re right and you’re being misleading at best
My understanding is that since 2019 there is a one-time certification fee, which you can choose to ignore if you feel you can sell your hardware without certification.
 
It says it supports:

Thunderbolt 3 (which is 20.625 Gbps per lane).
USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) (it says "Gen 2 up to" which is weird because Gen 2 is only 10 Gbps)
DisplayPort HBR3 (8.1 Gbps per lane).

What about:
Thunderbolt 2 (10.3125 Gbps per lane)? (it says up to 40 Gb/s so it could mean 20 Gb/s is also possible)
USB 3.0 (5 Gbps)?
DisplayPort RBR (1.62 Gbps), HBR (2.7 Gbps), HBR2 (5.4 Gbps)? (it says HBR3 without saying "up to" which is weird)
 
It says it supports:

Thunderbolt 3 (which is 20.625 Gbps per lane).
USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) (it says "Gen 2 up to" which is weird because Gen 2 is only 10 Gbps)
DisplayPort HBR3 (8.1 Gbps per lane).

What about:
Thunderbolt 2 (10.3125 Gbps per lane)? (it says up to 40 Gb/s so it could mean 20 Gb/s is also possible)
USB 3.0 (5 Gbps)?
DisplayPort RBR (1.62 Gbps), HBR (2.7 Gbps), HBR2 (5.4 Gbps)? (it says HBR3 without saying "up to" which is weird)

The different protocols negotiate for the most speed the devices commonly support. The cable also is part of the negotiation between devices. And yes indeed, this cable will support lower data rates. It should absolutely work with 20 Gbps Thunderbolt 3 devices, however this is not the type of cable to be used with Thunderbolt 2 devices, since you have to plug in the Apple TB3 to TB2 adapter and then a TB2 cable to the device, or even in the other direction with a TB2 computer and a TB3 device. But this cable will not be used for hosts or devices with only TB2. However, TB3 does run in a 20 Gbps mode and it will absolutely run in that mode with this cable, too.

Every USB cable that supports Gen 2 USB also supports Gen 1 USB. If it didn’t we’d be in a whole new level of USB suckitude. And yes, even USB 2.0 works over this cable, every USB-C and Thunderbolt 3 cable supports USB 2.0, it’s just some do not support USB 3.x, because those are a type of cable that’s wired up with USB 2.0 lanes and reserves the 3.x lanes for Thunderbolt, so it can only be used with Thunderbolt for higher data rates than 2.0 USB. However this cable is very special because it’s the first I’ve seen to support 2.0m length and Thunderbolt alongside USB 3.x alongside Displayport.

I don’t know if the lower DP rates would ever be seen, since the monitors would support a higher DP version if they had USB-C input, but it absolutely should work for the lower DP versions, as long as the monitor supports DP over USB-C.
 
The different protocols negotiate for the most speed the devices commonly support. The cable also is part of the negotiation between devices. And yes indeed, this cable will support lower data rates.

Every USB cable that supports Gen 2 USB also supports Gen 1 USB. If it didn’t we’d be in a whole new level of USB suckitude. And yes, even USB 2.0 works over this cable, every USB-C and Thunderbolt 3 cable supports USB 2.0, it’s just some do not support USB 3.x, because those are a type of cable that’s wired up with USB 2.0 lanes and reserves the 3.x lanes for Thunderbolt, so it can only be used with Thunderbolt for higher data rates than 2.0 USB. However this cable is very special because it’s the first I’ve seen to support 2.0m length and Thunderbolt alongside USB 3.x alongside Displayport.
The thing with active cables is that they have chips that work with only certain frequencies which is way most previous active Thunderbolt cables only did Thunderbolt. The fact that this one can do USB-C (USB and DisplayPort) is new and interesting and needs testing to be sure, since Apple did not explicitly mention all rates.

It should absolutely work with 20 Gbps Thunderbolt 3 devices, however this is not the type of cable to be used with Thunderbolt 2 devices, since you have to plug in the Apple TB3 to TB2 adapter and then a TB2 cable to the device, or even in the other direction with a TB2 computer and a TB3 device. But this cable will not be used for hosts or devices with only TB2. However, TB3 does run in a 20 Gbps mode and it will absolutely run in that mode with this cable, too.
True. I can't see a way to get 20 Gbps Thunderbolt 2 speeds on this cable unless a Thunderbolt 3 device forces it (but I can't recall a Thunderbolt 3 device that forces Thunderbolt 2 speeds unless there's a cable problem).

I don’t know if the lower DP rates would ever be seen, since the monitors would support a higher DP version if they had USB-C input, but it absolutely should work for the lower DP versions, as long as the monitor supports DP over USB-C.
Right. You probably need a 1920x1080 60Hz display to get RBR, a 2560x1440 60Hz display to get HBR, a 3840x2160 60Hz display to get HBR2, and a 3840x2160 95Hz or 5120x2880Hz display to get HBR3. I have a 4K display (Acer XV273K) that supports all those timings (actual timings, not scaled timings, verified with SwitchResX and AGDCDiagnose - really interesting that a 4K display can accept a 5K timing and scale it...) but all the timings use a HBR3 signal.

Anyway, you could use the cable to connect a USB-C dock. Then the DisplayPort output can use DisplayPort adapters. You could find different displays or USB-C/DisplayPort to HDMI or VGA adapters that use lower link rates (Apple has a VGA adapter that does 3.24 Gbps per lane which is twice RBR link rate and not a standard DisplayPort link rate). Some USB-C docks provide 4 lanes of DisplayPort and USB 2.0 (Cable Matters has some). Most USB-C docks provide 2 lanes of DisplayPort.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amethyst1
The thing with active cables is that they have chips that work with only certain frequencies which is way most previous active Thunderbolt cables only did Thunderbolt. The fact that this one can do USB-C (USB and DisplayPort) is new and interesting and needs testing to be sure, since Apple did not explicitly mention all rates.

I have a theory this cable is both active and passive. It has to be active to work over long distances like this, I don't think passive cables are even allowed 40 Gbps line rates at 2m. But it can run in passive mode if it detects USB protocol only (which is used to negotiate DP alt mode and Superspeed USB). All it needs to do is switch the circuit from direct line for passive to the active controller which will then feed the line if it detects it needs active. This could be the reason for the high expense too. Most other cable makers recognize that if you were using a cable like this you might be pure Thunderbolt or pure USB and you won't really need crossover capabilities.

Consequentially then it stands to reason it works like any other active cable in 40 Gbps Thunderbolt mode and works like any other passive cable in USB/DP alt mode.

True. I can't see a way to get 20 Gbps Thunderbolt 2 speeds on this cable unless a Thunderbolt 3 device forces it (but I can't recall a Thunderbolt 3 device that forces Thunderbolt 2 speeds unless there's a cable problem).

Lot of PC laptops with TB3 actually run in 20 Gbps mode. My work laptop is like that. You can hook up two TB3 computers and get an ethernet connection (virtual) between them, I hooked my work laptop into my MBP to see it in action, I looked at the Thunderbolt Ethernet connection line rate, it said it was 20 Gbps, and the Thunderbolt software on the PC said it was in 2 PCIe lane mode or also known as 20 Gbps. Many reviewers criticize PC makers for only hooking up 2 PCIe lanes to the TB controller, as it halves the bandwidth and makes a lot of TB devices much slower than they can be, like eGPUs would run way worse.
 
Lot of PC laptops with TB3 actually run in 20 Gbps mode. My work laptop is like that. You can hook up two TB3 computers and get an ethernet connection (virtual) between them, I hooked my work laptop into my MBP to see it in action, I looked at the Thunderbolt Ethernet connection line rate, it said it was 20 Gbps, and the Thunderbolt software on the PC said it was in 2 PCIe lane mode or also known as 20 Gbps. Many reviewers criticize PC makers for only hooking up 2 PCIe lanes to the TB controller, as it halves the bandwidth and makes a lot of TB devices much slower than they can be, like eGPUs would run way worse.
PCIe link width or link rate of Thunderbolt controller doesn't affect Thunderbolt link width or link rate of Thunderbolt port. They can still be transmitting at 40 Gbps while only being able to do 20 Gbps of actual data. I mean, I can put a Thunderbolt controller in my Mac Pro 2008 in a PCIe 1.0 slot (1000 MB/s max ≈750 MB/s of data), a PCIe 2.0 slot (2000 MB/s max, 1500 MB/s of data) or I can add a PCIe 3.0 slot (4000 MB/s max, ~2700 MB/s of data) and they all use 40 Gbps Thunderbolt 3 mode. 20 Gbps Thunderbolt mode can happen in Thunderbolt 3 if using the Apple Thunderbolt 3 to Thunderbolt 2 adapter or if you're using a long USB-C cable (10 Gbps per lane, 2 Thunderbolt lanes) or if there's a problem with one of the lanes (20 Gbps on a single Thunderbolt lane). Anyway, while PCIe data is limited on Thunderbolt (and similarly, Thunderbolt network data), the rest of the 40 Gbps can be filled up with DisplayPort data (which takes precedence over PCIe data). I don't think I've seen Thunderbolt software on the PC showing controller PCIe link width before (it's been awhile since I looked at Thunderbolt on Windows) - I would like to see a screenshot of that.
 
FFS. This is a dogdamned mess. It’s almost like we would be better off if we still had a different connector for everything.
 
The high price aside, this cable looks really good. Ordered one, and will post comments on the qulity when it arrives. I use a dock and MBP so need a longer Tb3 cable that can "do it all".
 
Last edited:
Oh wow, that's one fat cable. And yet it's only 6ft. Woof! Quite a steep price for a 6ft cable. If you're using a sit-stand desk, it means you'll probably have to keep your mac pro on the table or hanging underneath it too. I guess 6ft for a macbook pro would be fine since you'll probably be keeping that on the table, though.

Then again, now that I work from home, I bought a couple of 10ft cables so that my work macbook pro could sit on my computer cabinet instead of taking up desk space. I like it there. It keeps the loud fan roaring away from me lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: canhaz
So the cable arrived today. Whether its worth $130 bucks would be for you to decide. For me, absolutely. Love it.

Feels really premium, and hefty but not cumbersome or stupidly big like those long HDMI cables. Really wanted a braided cable as I use it daily plugging in and out and braided feels nicer to handle. It's also stiff but unlike other solid core cable such a anker powerline+ II/III it doesn't stay kinked/bent, which is fantasic. Admitedly I haven't tried the braided version of the Anker Powerlines yet

Wiggling the cable we see there's very little movement, though it's not nonexistant. It's not enough to cause any disconnections to my dock (which has 2 NVME drives, Ethernet and Phones attached.). The dock uses thankfully uses 3 prong power, so no annoying buzzing electrical effect from 2 prong chargers/docks.Before I had and NVME velcroed on the back of the Macbook Pro lid, to avoid plugging in to power and data cables. This makes the single cable solution just delightful.

Here a few photos.
 

Attachments

  • D5A5E8E4-8B51-4789-ABCB-E0D03A33A560_1_105_c.jpeg
    D5A5E8E4-8B51-4789-ABCB-E0D03A33A560_1_105_c.jpeg
    120 KB · Views: 111
  • DA44E150-4E4C-4C88-A30C-BF525E996F7B_1_105_c.jpeg
    DA44E150-4E4C-4C88-A30C-BF525E996F7B_1_105_c.jpeg
    246.4 KB · Views: 112
  • AF9698A1-0E3E-4F43-9E51-159705A222EA_1_105_c.jpeg
    AF9698A1-0E3E-4F43-9E51-159705A222EA_1_105_c.jpeg
    163.8 KB · Views: 127
  • 80B44781-0D00-4C0F-8BE9-266A42A8029A_1_105_c.jpeg
    80B44781-0D00-4C0F-8BE9-266A42A8029A_1_105_c.jpeg
    275.7 KB · Views: 125
  • 7CB846AC-55DF-4655-9431-2F6510491D60_1_105_c.jpeg
    7CB846AC-55DF-4655-9431-2F6510491D60_1_105_c.jpeg
    107.2 KB · Views: 114
  • Like
Reactions: martyjmclean
So the cable arrived today. Whether its worth $130 bucks would be for you to decide. For me, absolutely. Love it.

Feels really premium, and hefty but not cumbersome or stupidly big like those long HDMI cables. Really wanted a braided cable as I use it daily plugging in and out and braided feels nicer to handle. It's also stiff but unlike other solid core cable such a anker powerline+ II/III it doesn't stay kinked/bent, which is fantasic. Admitedly I haven't tried the braided version of the Anker Powerlines yet

Wiggling the cable we see there's very little movement, though it's not nonexistant. It's not enough to cause any disconnections to my dock (which has 2 NVME drives, Ethernet and Phones attached.). The dock uses thankfully uses 3 prong power, so no annoying buzzing electrical effect from 2 prong chargers/docks.Before I had and NVME velcroed on the back of the Macbook Pro lid, to avoid plugging in to power and data cables. This makes the single cable solution just delightful.

Here a few photos.
Hi,

Thanks for your initial feedback on this cable.
What about USB 3.2 (10gbps) compatibility? Did you test it?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.