Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I support the lawsuit. It could be a bug for 2~3 months but it's now 4 years.

It's been going on since 2011. That would be actually three years. ;)

----------

is it a software bug when its over 3 years old, known and makes leaving the ios system more difficult and unpleasant?

maybe its a bug but its certainly not a frivolous one.

what method do you propose? apple dosent seem to care and that a person has to sue says more about apple than the plaintiff or the legal system

No. It says that there are other things in OS X and iOS that need priority for existing customers, not former ones.
 
is it a software bug when its over 3 years old, known and makes leaving the ios system more difficult and unpleasant?

maybe its a bug but its certainly not a frivolous one.

what method do you propose? apple dosent seem to care and that a person has to sue says more about apple than the plaintiff or the legal system

No, its a bug. Autodesk had a bug in Maya making it unusable on a Mac with certain ATI cards for 4 years. Did I sue Autodesk? No I switched to another program.

Apple had an OpenGL bug since the beginning of Mavericks that made one of my softwares really laggy. Did I sue? No. I filed bug reports (something I guarantee almost no one with this bug did) repeatedly and the problem got fixed.

Suing over something so silly is ridiculous. There is no spin you can make to justify it.
 
but it's a bug that apple hasn't acted on. no matter your stance or favoritism toward or not regarding apple, they are obligated to fix the issue. the phone number does not belong to apple, if someone moves on from the apple ecosystem and apple is making it so people can't use their phone number to the full extent, they should fix it. the fact they haven't lends themselves to be sued.

Have you read any software EULA? There is no responsibility to the company.
 
Maybe because of reporting it people post about it on Facebook and on forums thinking Apple reads these things.

Suing over a software bug is stupid, there is nothing you can say to sway my opinion. Get angry? Yes. Switch platforms? Yes. Sue? No.
Because after all this time there's clearly a better way to somehow force the hand of a company to finally address an issue that affects a fundamental cellular service like messaging after they've been ignoring it for so long, right?

----------

Where did you read somebody would have to get a new number? The article only states that people called into Apple and the solution was to have their numbers removed from iMessage registry only.
Because for some of those that none of these solutions worked and they ended up with crippled findamental service like messaging some of those wouldn't turn to changing their number to restore functional messaging service?
 
No, its a bug. Autodesk had a bug in Maya making it unusable on a Mac with certain ATI cards for 4 years. Did I sue Autodesk? No I switched to another program.

Apple had an OpenGL bug since the beginning of Mavericks that made one of my softwares really laggy. Did I sue? No. I filed bug reports (something I guarantee almost no one with this bug did) repeatedly and the problem got fixed.

Suing over something so silly is ridiculous. There is no spin you can make to justify it.

There was no benefit to Autodesk from that bug, while there is a benefit to Apple with this one.
 
It's been going on since 2011. That would be actually three years. ;)

----------



No. It says that there are other things in OS X and iOS that need priority for existing customers, not former ones.
A difference between 3 and 4 years is surely a meaningful one in a case like this where it has been ignored long enough.

And what other things in iOS and OS X cripple a fundamental service again, especially tied to leaving the ecosystem which can seem oh so shady (even if there's actually nothing shady behind it).
 
You mean, Apple needs to fix this for their former customers?

No. Apple needs to fix this for customers who use other Apple products for the time being. Maybe Apple can retain them that way.

Do you remember when switching meant moving to Apple?
 
Have you read any software EULA? There is no responsibility to the company.
Despite what might or might not be in that, a company is on the hook for issues it creates and ignores. Can't excuse yourself from negligence through some agreement.
 
No. It says that there are other things in OS X and iOS that need priority for existing customers, not former ones.

ok that explains why this bug is left unfixed.

the lack of logic in your post is astounding.

btw if iphone users (current customers in your view) cant send messages to previous iphone customers then that obviously affects current iphone customers as well.

No, its a bug. Autodesk had a bug in Maya making it unusable on a Mac with certain ATI cards for 4 years. Did I sue Autodesk? No I switched to another program.

Apple had an OpenGL bug since the beginning of Mavericks that made one of my softwares really laggy. Did I sue? No. I filed bug reports (something I guarantee almost no one with this bug did) repeatedly and the problem got fixed.

Suing over something so silly is ridiculous. There is no spin you can make to justify it.

ok and everyone must follow your example? seriously what is your solution. should they send bug reports forever? should they get a new number, buy everyone around them another phone or should they get a new family, friends job etc?

but autodesk isnt hampering your experience with your new software are they?

the only justification i am making is that apple clearly dosent care and this is the way disputes and unhappiness (apple as prime example) are settled today. i dont find that situation appealing at all. its a sad state of affairs.
 
Last edited:
ok that explains why the bug with with the message app where the db can end up being a few gb and the only way to fix that is to a clean restore.

the lack of logic in your post is astounding.

Talk about lack of logic. I don't even understand a word of what you said in relevance to what I said.
 
Talk about lack of logic. I don't even understand a word of what you said in relevance to what I said.

perhaps you are not aware (shouldnt have assumed you necessarily knew about it) is that there is a bug with the messages app db that where it grows to be in the gigabytes and there is no way to fix that except to do a clean restore of the phone and losing all past messages.

ie an unpleasant bug for "existing" customers
 
Last edited:
perhaps you are not aware (wouldnt suprise me) is that there is a bug with the messages app db that where they go grow to be in the gigabytes and there is no way to fix that except to do a clean restore of the phone and losing all past messages.

ie an unpleasant bug for "existing" customers

Uh, there are other things that people need to use iOS and OSX for besides messages that Apple needs to put a priority to. And hey, watch your tone. It's just a discussion here, you insulting me starts to tell me things about you. I have not posted an insult or a put-down towards you, so remain civil or look for someone else to throw your petty insults towards.
 
Uh, there are other things that people need to use iOS and OSX for besides messages that Apple needs to put a priority to. And hey, watch your tone. It's just a discussion here, you insulting me starts to tell me things about you. I have not posted an insult or a put-down towards you, so remain civil or look for someone else to throw your petty insults towards.

it was not meant as an insult and i modified my post so there could be no mistake.

come on you cannot use the same "priority" excuse whenever it suits you. then its not much of a discussion board.

imessage should never have been released if they didnt know how they could release numbers back into the "wild".
 
While this may be an issue, it is not lawsuit worthy. If you knew a thing or two about contract law, you would realize the absurdity of this case.

The issue I have here is that people feel so ****ing entitled to a functioning service that if it fails, they feel they deserve monetary compensation. That is not only wrong, it is legally bulli*****. No one is forcing iMessage down your throat. No one is forcing an iPhone down your throat. YOU bought it. Your get what you paid for. Deal with it.

End result doesn't need to be a lawsuit win. The end result should be that apple gets its act together and works diligently on this issue so that it is solved.

In the off chance that they are hiding something (like purposely not fixing it in order to keep customers), then the lawsuit will have served to expose that and in turn, the lawsuit would be very valid in that scenario.
 
I dont have this issue as I have been a loyal fan since the begining. However, my experience is that when I send a message with imessage it will try to send it and if it cannot it tells me that it was sent a regular text message (SMS). So why does it not do that here? When it clearly realizes in the vast servers at Apple that a message is not delivered why does it not switch to SMS as it does for me? What am I missing here?

Not everyone has the option to send as SMS enabled.

----------

You mean, Apple needs to fix this for their former customers?

No, their current customers. You know, the ones sending the messages from their iphones, which then get hijacked by Apple and never delivered. Those customers.
 
You know what, this whole "suing culture" is society's downfall.
Seriously, suing a company for undelivered messages? Get a grip.

Everybody's just after quick cash these days, hence this blame culture that has befallen us.
 
I got another phone, my brother and his wife can not send me texts.

Called apple and they told me nothing they already deactivated my device from my account. To this day I can not get messages. Called them a few weeks ago, I was told I might have to have my carrier switch my phone number.

If class action opens up, I am jumping on that.

I am trying to understand why the FTC isn't going after Apple by the jugular on this. Or carriers. They are essentially hijacking your phone number, and there are already laws about this from when long distance companies used to steal your account and you did not switch, or you switched and they hijacked you back. The only thing I can think of as to why this isn't the case is that the number is not totally hijacked, but it still interferes with communications.... and that is totally and FTC no no.

I hope this class action law suit does happen, as it might get the FTC looking at this.

I am also scratching my head as to why Apple cannot fix this.

1. It should never have been linked to a phone number. It should be linked to the device ID only, which would be linked to your Apple account to sync with Mac's and iPads.
2. iMessage should by default know that the text is coming from an Apple device and not duplicate that message, but still send through texts to a number when it is not going to an Apple device. Devices should be in the database by device ID/Apple account only.

They really need to redo the enter app and process. It might not fix the people who are already screwed but it would prevent future occurrences.

IT just works does not apply here.
 
I had this issue. Went to a Samsung Note 3 and the iMessage/iPhone texts was all messed up.
Before selling everything I had turned off the account, turned off all the settings in iMessages on all the devices, etc. It still didn't work. I called Apple and they basically told me to do what I had already done. :rolleyes: Having been using the iPhone since the very first one came out until the iPhone 5, I was a loyal customer, but this really left a bad taste in my mouth. I was upset because I had no support whatsoever. Google gave me what I needed.

A week later, I contacted all my iPhone friends, had them turn on SMS and that resolved everything. However, it was a pain. My friends shouldn't have to do that for them to receive and send texts to me. It was pathetically frustrating to say the least. I'm positive there are still some iMessages floating out there that I've never received.
 
Last edited:
Geez it's right there in front of you in B/W. How difficult is this to comprehend. To turn off iMessage is simple. This lawsuit is just ridiculous and for the lazy crybabies who sue because they have to lift a finger or burn precious calories to use their brain.

https://www.apple.com/ios/messages/

If you’re a texter, you’ll love Messages on iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch. Now they all come with iMessage, a service that’s an even better kind of texting. Because it’s free for you and anyone texting over Wi-Fi using an iOS device or Mac with iMessage. And it’s unlimited.* So say as much as you want.
 
wow I dont even know where to begin with this. Put down your Apple pom-poms for a minute and educate yourself on the issue. my friend knows what he signed up for with imessage... what he didnt sign up for was for Apple engineers to screw this up so that Apple servers hold his number hostage once he leaves the apple ecosystem.

Thank you!
 
Geez it's right there in front of you in B/W. How difficult is this to comprehend. To turn off iMessage is simple. This lawsuit is just ridiculous and for the lazy crybabies who sue because they have to lift a finger or burn precious calories to use their brain.

As already explained in multiple posts, turning off iMessages does not always fix the issue. Some users state that they tried everything, including contacting Apple to find a solution, without success. On top of that, even Apple acknowledges the problem, as explained in the article itself:

An Apple customer support representative told Pash that the iMessage bug is "a problem a lot of people are facing" and that the company's engineering team "is working on it but is apparently clueless as how to fix it."

If Apple's engineers themselves currently don't know how to fix the issue a user has very little chance of being successful, no matter how many fingers he lifts or how many calories his brain burns.
 
I think that is hilarious.

----------


The sender would obviously know if you received the iMessages or not. It shows a little "delivered" message at the bottom right when the recipient gets the iMessage. It's really quite obvious.

Oooooooooh. I get it now. Thanks!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.