It's written in the contract between Apple & Verizon. They agreed, as did AT&T, for the first two years a new carrier has the iPhone Apple has control over employee activations. Verizon cannot activate employee lines until Apple says so.
If they do, which is obviously very easy, once that line is detected a surcharge hits Verizon. Make _No Mistake_ the only company in charge of iPhone policy every step of the way is Apple.
Those who find that hard to believe have no clue regarding Apples power.
Witness the fact that the iPhone is the _only phone_ ever to be exempt from Carrier Bloatware.
Don't be fooled, Apple does what Apple wants, when Apple wants, without consequence. No one comes between Apple & their products.
OP, where did you purchase your iPhone from?
The reason they gave me was that they wanted to "make sure there's enough for the customers" so after they aren't back ordered anymore, I'll be able to activate it.
The reason AT&T may not do this could possibly be cause there's not much they can do to stop activations. You can just slap a SIM card in it and go.
I don't know for sure who it is, and I can't find anything on the web about it.
I could easily see it being Verizon, but don't act like this isn't the kind of thing Apple would do.
It doesn't make sense for EITHER company to do it,
it's definitely in no way good for business for both, and it's a piss-poor way to treat employees if it's Verizon.
Witness the fact that the iPhone is the _only phone_ ever to be exempt from Carrier Bloatware.
I believe you'll also have a hard time activating a Droid RAZR currently, at least until the holidays are over.
You must be new to Verizon, because this is a long-standing policy. In exchange for a deeply-discounted line as an employee, you don't get the benefit of getting the flagship shinyPhone the moment it comes out. That's the price you pay.
Do you like, get decent commissions? Because you sure don't put much effort into gathering information. A skill you'd definitely need to make sales.
Considering that Apple employees were allowed to get iPhones when they came out, and in fact were given free first-gen iPhones when it launched, no, this is not characteristic of Apple.
On the contrary: it makes perfect sense. They don't want employees hogging up the inventory. Or worse, being unscrupulous about it, hogging up the inventory and then immediately selling the iPhones they bought on eBay for a hugely inflated price, then either pocket the cash or sit on it to buy another iPhone full-price and still make a profit.
You feel that way because it doesn't benefit you. In reality though, they'd much rather see the public being able to buy those phones, and not blogging about how employees get first pick while everyone else has to wait a couple weeks at best to get theirs.
It's not Apple, it's Verizon limiting you. Don't blame Apple for Verizons stupid policy.
I have an employee line for sprint and have the iPhone 4S. The guy at the Sprint store got mad when I asked him about it and said good luck and here I am with it, glad I laughed in his face.
doesn't verizon have them in-store at this point? a coworker is going to get one on friday. I will ask if he had to order it or if they had it in store.
I've always heard sometimes carrier employees aren't allowed to have big ticket devices (iPhones) for a while after launch.
What on earth makes you think apple has anything to do with this OP? Apple sells an iPhone for a profit and doesn't give a damn (within reason) what happens to it after it is purchased.
Your employer has this restriction because they want to prioritize their customers over their employees. And you are calling them every day to try to harass them into allowing you to activate it? You must not like your job much.
Check with your HR or employee accounts department, get a date and accept the fact that what they say goes regardless of how unreasonable you think it is.
situation doesn't turn out to be apple, you've got to be kidding if you don't think this is something they would do. They are well known for their totalitarian control over everything they produce. Just look at when they bricked jailbroken iPhones a couple years ago. Or how they refuse to offer iPhones to a carrier that wants any bloatware on it. Or how they sue companies producing android phones for patent infringements and then blatantly copy the notficiation system. I love apple products, but their business tactics are less than
Not to mention my current phone (Droid Pro) has a completely cracked screen. At least once a day a customer asks me about it. "How do you work at Verizon and have a broken screen?!"
Perhaps you should tell them the truth: you didn't take good enough care of your phone. I've never heard of the Droid Pro having a defect where cracks just spontaneously show up on the screen over time.
The takeaway I would get from your "explanation" of the situation is not that Verizon treats its employees badly, but rather it employees immature, self-entitled people who expect to have expensive smartphones handed to them like candy, when I as a customer am stuck paying full price if I bust mine up and its not yet 2 years. Would I want to give you a commission? Probably not.
It's not Verizon's fault that your screen cracked. It's yours. And phones cost money, even fi you work for them. it's not their obligation to replace a phone you broke all because you treat them like disposable items.
No I will not accept it. Maybe if they would give me a date I would accept it. Or if I would have been told before I actually bought the device. No, I think I'm being pretty reasonable.
What on earth makes you think apple has anything to do with this OP? Apple sells an iPhone for a profit and doesn't give a damn (within reason) what happens to it after it is purchased.
Where are you getting, out of all of this, that I'm expecting Verizon to replace a phone for me?
It's easy for you to act like you would be fine with it when you're not in the situation yourself.
So they never had concern for people jailbreaking iPhones? Seems like time and time again apple cares very much what is going on with the devices they no longer own.