Apple made sure it's work around does not break the original injunction.
If the patent is for on device, absolutely. The watch is now basically a sensor like you could buy from dozens of companies. But even those non-Masimo companies do the blood ox on device without a license.Surely the key question is does Apple's solution actually get around Massimo's patents? If it does then no problem with relaxing the ban. If it doesn't, then another infringement case is looming (with a likely much higher fine for Apple if it looses).
Masimo’s patent is too broad as described here. Should be limited or struck.The patents Masimo are claiming that Apple infringed include one that describes a non-invasive device that produces and is responsive to light based signals responsive to analytes in blood communicating to a “monitor” which may include handheld computing devices like a mobile phone (among other examples) see US patent 10945648B2.
I’m just a simple caveman. I don’t understand technology and your world scares me, but I do know that Masimo has owns a patent and that the Apple Watch has functions that are covered by that patent.
Tachycardia doesn't cause hypoxia. It can be a response to something causing hypoxia. And tachycardia can be detected without a pulse ox. If they were put on blood thinners, most likely they detected afib. Which the watch can do without a pulse oximeter. Or they found a PE, which a lack of hypoxia doesn't rule out in anyway regardless.Actually I have a relative for whom it played a vital role in extending their life. It identified that they were experiencing episodes of tachycardia. Basically their heart beat was consistently too fast leading to low blood oxygen. That trend observed over time was what lead to them getting help during a more extreme episode. They ended up on blood thinners.
Why this was so useful is that they had dementia. Originally we got the watch for them due to their risk of falls. They couldn’t take active readings easily and not without assistance. But the ability for the watch to do it passively in the background was how their condition was identified. Heck we never would have known to take blood oxygen readings. Or even know what this condition was. We hadn’t heard of it.
My family members case is more of an edge case. But if this technology helps even a small number of people, then it’s worth having. I wouldn’t go as far as calling Masimo a patent troll. I also don’t agree with companies allegedly stealing other peoples work. But I do know the impact of this feature is real and hopefully a solution is found to the dispute soon. Because it really can make a difference.
I don't watch movies, so I have no idea what you're talking about. lol.So basically we’re going the Brawndo route and you’re like cool I liked that movie. You can’t stop Apple just let them do anything they have money.
Fortunately the rumor is they’re are dropping that.But then apple won't have enough money for baseball on apple tv.
Except that Apple just announced they’re ending MLB!But then apple won't have enough money for baseball on apple tv.
Because that’s not what they did. They developed a way to transmit the raw data from the sensors to the phone and then do all the calculations to convert the raw data to Ox% on the phone. It is the moving of the calculations to the phone as well as the display of the result on the phone that is important.why did it take Apple 2 years to come up with the brilliant work around of....just show the results on iPhone only.
My statement is 100% factual whether you like it or not . I’ve been an RT for 15 years, trust Apple isn’t saving lives, they are playing bully as usualA pulse ox doesn’t really save lives at a hospital much less on phone. They are very inconsistent based on the finger, the temperature of the skin etc
I don't get it. If there wasn't some agreement being made behind the scenes with Massimo, then why did it take Apple 2 years to come up with the brilliant work around of....just show the results on iPhone only.
There was never any proof of this.So someone steals your life's work and your advice to them is to get a life. OK.
Does Masimo have a product yet? Last I saw their watch was still vaporware.So someone steals your life's work and your advice to them is to get a life. OK.
You need to look at the claims of the patent to see what is protected. Hint: not everything described in the patent is protected. The claims are fairly narrow.The patents Masimo are claiming that Apple infringed include one that describes a non-invasive device that produces and is responsive to light based signals responsive to analytes in blood communicating to a “monitor” which may include handheld computing devices like a mobile phone (among other examples) see US patent 10945648B2.
I’m just a simple caveman. I don’t understand technology and your world scares me, but I do know that Masimo has owns a patent and that the Apple Watch has functions that are covered by that patent.
I didn’t say the Tachycardia necessarily caused the hypoxia. The hypoxia was a symptom of a very fast heart beat relating to Tachycardia. But from what I understand it does work both ways.Tachycardia doesn't cause hypoxia. It can be a response to something causing hypoxia. And tachycardia can be detected without a pulse ox. If they were put on blood thinners, most likely they detected afib. Which the watch can do without a pulse oximeter. Or they found a PE, which a lack of hypoxia doesn't rule out in anyway regardless.
Whether or not it's appropriate to put a demented patient prone to falls on blood thinners... that's a discussion I'll leave to the family and docs involved.
Apple likes to buy competing companies on the cheap unless they are forced to buy high which was the case when they bought Intel’s modem division for $1 Billion. Cook 🧑🍳 generally likes to stay away from multi-billion dollar acquisitions. Apple still has not bought ChatGPT or Perplexity AI. Cook 🧑🍳 thinks he can build his own LLM. Cook 🧑🍳 will ride this Workaround Masimo’s patent until 2028 when the patent expires.Considering how they often buy a company to use some tech, but then never improve it and shut down half the stuff (stuff like Dark Sky or Siri), I think that would be terrible for the medical industry. I doubt Apple have much interest in all the other medical industry devices they make but people no doubt depend on their stuff.
It is patent at this point I belive all the rest have voided and this one will most likely end the same way once it works its way through the courts.Surely the key question is does Apple's solution actually get around Massimo's patents? If it does then no problem with relaxing the ban. If it doesn't, then another infringement case is looming (with a likely much higher fine for Apple if it looses).
Go figure. You can buy one of those "O2 finger testers" in any drugstore for cheap. This is patent trolling IMHO.Masimo is putting people’s lives at risk. These health monitoring systems put on to a consumer product like an Apple Watch saves lives. OK.
Go figure. You can buy one of those "O2 finger testers" in any drugstore for cheap. This is patent trolling IMHO.