Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
lol. Many of us are expecting Apple to invent something magical every damn year. Sadly, that isn't the case. As others have said, innovation takes time. For now, let's all be patient and just enjoy the amazing, beautiful products Apple has brought us. :)
 
I love how your brain just shuts off when you see the words "Fox News". Tons of stories are reported by both Fox News and your favorite corrupt media outlet, but I guess it's still nonsense, right?

As I've said before, they may be owned by the same folks, but FBN is not Fox News. They have different purposes for existing. One is for news, the other is for business (I know, shocker).

Oh hey look, another!

Oh, please. Poking fun at a clearly fictional story from a second rate "business" channel equates to a failure to give due credit?

A straw man argument does not negate an il--founded, speculative linkbait story with no corroborating evidence from a channel with zero, I repeat zero, track record for reporting Apple news.

Perhaps you stand to benefit from manipulation of the Apple stock price. Only reason I can think of for your absurd holier-than-though attitude.
 
Does anyone hear anything about the Samsung board of directors being concerned with the pace of innovation? I don't think so. Maybe the vertical integration of it's business allows it to develop products faster, rather than having to farm out all it's manufacturing, like Apple does. Then again, maybe they are driven to pummel Apple into the ground, and Apple doesn't realize it yet.
 
Tim Cook is not Steve

Don't compare them. He is better at damage control. The problem is he is not standing over people threatening them with their job. Maybe innovation is happening at the right speed for these days.
 
Steve needed 8 years to present the iPhone since the first iPod. And another 3 years to present the iPad since the iPhone. Four years have passed since the iPad. The Apple TVand the iWatch are due to come in the next years, but they must not rush it until they have it right.

The Board will shut up once the iPhone 5C and 5S comes out. They will blow the market, im sure.
 
Asking Tim Cook to innovate is like asking Steve Jobs to run Worldwide Operations.
Asking Tim Cook to innovate is like asking Dexter to not suck this final season.
Asking Tim Cook to innovate is like asking Breaking Bad to suck this final season.
Asking Tim Cook to innovate is like asking Twitter for 141 characters.
Asking Tim Cook to innovate is like asking Jony Ive to change the newsstand icon.
Asking Tim Cook to innovate is like asking OS X installation screen to print the correct estimated amount of time left.
Asking Tim Cook to innovate is like asking for Ocean's 14.
Asking Tim Cook to innovate is like asking for a bag of cookies where all cookies are intact.
Asking Tim Cook to innovate is like asking for Lay's to make Lay's Ketchup for USA.
Asking Tim Cook to innovate is like asking for NBC to do the Tonight Show right.
Asking Tim Cook to innovate is like asking that dude that's texting while crossing the street to walk faster.

lol it take you a while to come up with that?
 
They mustn't rush. Innovation takes time. I feel like there's a bit of a lack of innovation in the technology industry as a whole right now, but if hey think about it long and hard they'll come up with something decent.

They have by far the highest money reserves. Still, they don't innovate as fast as other companies. See for example Nokia and their camera tech. They have orders of magnitude less money; still, they have a camera tech that is orders of magnitude better than that of Apple.

They have only themselves to blame.
 
Board expecting miracles?

This whole questioning Tim is really the bane of success. The more successful you are, the more demanding shareholders, and by extension, the board, become. When you're a relatively small company, doing well, everybody is happy. Then when you start growing, and become really successful, any hiccup, even if only temporary, is enough to question if the sky is falling, and a call for heads to roll. My sense of what may be happening here.

While he may not have the vision of Steve, Tim is, and has been, a great CEO, doing an excellent job of running an almost impossible company to oversee. To wit: The relentless pressures of staying at the top; securing of supply lines into the future; research; innovation; acquiring the right companies to further your future goals; protection of IP; keeping a lid on products under development, so as not to tip off the competition; staying abreast of different legal requirements in different markets; holding on to top talent; mediating personality conflicts at the highest level; motivating and inspiring a workforce of almost 73,000, and setting an impeccable personal example to said workforce; endless lawsuits; environmental policies; being 'green' in everything from manufacturing facilities, new buildings, as well as all consumables used on a daily basis; constant governmental scrutiny; constant criticism of worker abuses going on at APPLE's manufacturing partners; stock market performance; having an innate sense of which direction to go in, tech wise; product decisions; market timing; and I could go on and on. This is a labor of love and a 24/7 job to be sure, 9to5ers need not apply.

I can not see anybody on the horizon, at the moment, who could do a better job running APPLE. If a great visionary popped out of nowhere, and became the new CEO, that would be no automatic guarantee, that he/she wouldn't run the company slowly into the ground. It takes more than vision alone, to run the world's foremost technology company profitably and efficiently.

Until this new 'Superman/woman' comes along, Tim who was after all handpicked and 'groomed' by Steve himself to be his successor, has my undivided support.
 
Last edited:
Ah, not quite

Apple is becoming another Microsoft, they now purchase innovation.

Apple is ever moving forward...sometimes not as fast as we or their Board likes but Apple is definitely not Microsoft.: Win 8.... Meh. Surface...double meh. And the Office and its awkward UI just sucks. The only products Microsoft makes that still are at the top of their game is Visio and Project which only run under Windows. And of course Visio was purchased several years ago.

The best portable computers--Apple.
The best tablet-- Apple.
The phone that started it all and is still very, very good -Apple.

But Microsoft does have Steve Ballmer: http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wvsboPUjrGc

Microsoft is a boat seemingly lost on the ocean while Apple knows where it's going.
 
Last edited:
They mustn't rush. Innovation takes time. I feel like there's a bit of a lack of innovation in the technology industry as a whole right now, but if hey think about it long and hard they'll come up with something decent.

Damn straight! Innovation for innovations sake is not the way to go. We don't need no half backed ideas.
 
They have by far the highest money reserves. Still, they don't innovate as fast as other companies. See for example Nokia and their camera tech. They have orders of magnitude less money; still, they have a camera tech that is orders of magnitude better than that of Apple.

They have only themselves to blame.

Improved tech? In what way?

It funny how people categorize innovation. For example, for many of you the iPad is innovation, when it is actualy just a bigger iPod touch. At the same time how Maverick manages the use of energy and the use of ram, to improve preformqnce and battery life, for most of you is just....meh...a good improvment but not innovation. When Apple double the write/read speed of the SSDs in its MBA line compared to what any other notebook on the market has to offer its not big deal for many people. My point is that many people speek about innovation but are blind to see it.
 
My retina MacBook is the best computer I've ever owned. The people who nitpick them are people who don't own one.

You can adjust the resolution..."Best for Retina" is default but you can get a lot more screen real estate if you choose.

Scaling is NOT a solution. And yes, I own one. Picked up a 15" on clearance at Best Buy a few weeks back. I'm giving it to my brother, though, because scaling = slower, and the resolution seriously bothers me. And yes, it's noticeable. When I run 1680x1050 or 1920x1200 scaled modes, even web-browsing isn't as smooth as native retina mode. Scrolling is quite choppy. Apple simply got it wrong, as far as I'm concerned. 1440x900 on the 15.4" is simply not an acceptable amount of real estate.

It's innovation because they are NOT at that resolution....And you can scale the display, and still have a much greater pixel density than(at the time of release) any laptop on the market....

See above.
 
What they've done so far: installed a bunch of solar panels, changed some icons in iOS, ****ed up valuable relations with manufacturers in China by trying to police the world with their bourgeois Western values, taken a longer Thanksgiving vacation, and created an ad campaign and OS theme based on California... not willing to face up to the fact that few people outside of the state of California, actually like California.

And nobody gives a *****.

Big surprise.

Self-indulgent, but not particularly innovative.
 
i feel I have love /hate relation with apple

recently switched to HTC one .. first feeling "freedom" & big amazing screen/build quality ( and become Android developer)

my friend switched to S4 .. i ask why "he said: you can do anything (freedom) & features"

--- Here are some tips for apple ---

stop controlling customers to much (specially Professionals)..

Open appletv for third party apps ..

and try to make things Cross-platform like ( imessage / facetime )

stop being political like supporting Gay rights

--------------

ios 7 is good & clean but with such small screen & apps with Ads .. content don't have space

Love Mac Pro & 15" mbp because i can do what ever i want .. install what ever i want [ freedom ]

and start concentrating on specs as well provide latest GFX cards [ nvidia / ati ] instead of crappy intel .. otherwise you will lose more customers
 
Last edited:
It's gettin' ugly in here

It's time for an entertainment break
 

Attachments

  • jazz-hands-a-chorus-line-demotivational-poster-1285733463.jpg
    jazz-hands-a-chorus-line-demotivational-poster-1285733463.jpg
    79.2 KB · Views: 83
Scaling is NOT a solution. And yes, I own one. Picked up a 15" on clearance at Best Buy a few weeks back. I'm giving it to my brother, though, because scaling = slower, and the resolution seriously bothers me. And yes, it's noticeable. When I run 1680x1050 or 1920x1200 scaled modes, even web-browsing isn't as smooth as native retina mode. Scrolling is quite choppy. Apple simply got it wrong, as far as I'm concerned. 1440x900 on the 15.4" is simply not an acceptable amount of real estate.



See above.

Acceptable for me. If you want higher res, wait for couple generations for faster GPU's so scaled resolutions works ok. But they will always be below the performance of native.
 
Reading between the lines, I would say that the board members of Apple are smart and experienced guys, and that report was actually quite good.
 
Does this mean that Apple can't just magic some revolutionary product out of their backside every 18-24 months? The only odd thing is that this is a surprise to anyone.

Sure, they had an incredible run from the iPod > iPhone > iPad, but here we are in 2013, and in terms of mobile devices of varying sizes that are good in different settings, we pretty much have every screen size and possible use covered. I think its going to take something pretty radical to shake anything up from where we are now.
 
They mustn't rush. Innovation takes time. I feel like there's a bit of a lack of innovation in the technology industry as a whole right now, but if hey think about it long and hard they'll come up with something decent.

No! They must act now, and act decisively. Abandon anything that might be in the pipeline, and come up with something new. Something Fabulous! Something that will change the world. And they must get it to market in time for the fall semester.
 
Wow!

I never knew Harvard Business School and Wharton had so many graduates! While we're on the topic, could you fix our deficit? Thanks! ;)
 
It is ridiculous that the board should scold Apple for "innovating too slowly". You can't force innovation. You can create the right environment for innovation to occur, but telling someone they need to innovate faster is never going to work out well.

Apple was never a company that innovated just for the sake of innovation. If they were, you'd see them coming out with products like Google Glass - undeniably innovative, but not something that is going to see success in the mass market and unlikely to have a real impact on the lives of everyday people - at least for the foreseeable future.

In fact, Apple have always taken existing inventions/innovations and polished them to perfection - until they were good enough to cross the "tipping point" from niche product to the mass market. MP3 players existed before the iPod, Smart Phones existed before the iPhone, and tablets existed before the iPad. In each of these cases, Apple were able to create products that were appreciably simpler, better, and more usable than what had come before them.
 
They mustn't rush. Innovation takes time. I feel like there's a bit of a lack of innovation in the technology industry as a whole right now, but if hey think about it long and hard they'll come up with something decent.

No, there is no lack of innovation in the technology industry right now - you're probably only focusing on the two big names Apple and Microsoft, but even Microsoft is currently much more innovative than Apple. At least MS tries very hard to redefine itself, and there is much more to that process than just Windows 8 and Surface.

If you want to find innovation, don't waste your time observing a mega-corporation like Apple who have become way too big to be innovative. Usually the only way for big companies to innovate is by acquiring smaller companies and their products. Corporations are too bureaucratic to still be creative.

If you want to see creativity and innovation, look at the small companies and the startups.

If you want to see the future of the smartphone, google for "Ubuntu Edge".
 
If you want to see the future of the smartphone, google for "Ubuntu Edge".

Ha, ha! Or have Stallman send you a Freerunner, pick the residual hairs from his neckbeard out of it, and then try to get it to do something.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Acceptable for me. If you want higher res, wait for couple generations for faster GPU's so scaled resolutions works ok. But they will always be below the performance of native.

Absolutely. Everyone has a different tolerance for this. And yes, we really do need some huge advancement in GPU tech to get higher res displays.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.