Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Not many people are going to buy this 16 pro/max since the 15 pro/max can already do all the ai stuff
There's always going to be a natural number of upgraders coming from older models who will decide it's time to get the latest version when the lineup is refreshed each fall. Plenty of users are still out there on 12 and 13 Pro/Max models who might have decided last year to get another year out of their current devices but are ready to upgrade this cycle. Most of those users will opt for whatever the newest model is. That the 15 Pro/Max can also run AI is irrelevant to most of these users.
 
Lots could happen such as a recession but as for now, you'd have to expect more demand for iphone 16. But still, Apple has to still sell AI. I didn't see anything at wwdc that would wow the masses. It doesn't take much though and that new siri lighting up on the perimeter of iphone may be all it takes.
 
Macrumor boomers are wild, they have a reality distortion glasses or something because these iPhones are gonna sell like crazy. Genmoji will be the catalyst.

You might think it’s dumb. You might not get it (of course yo don’t, you’re old af). But dumb money spends the same.
 
Please explain further your reasoning. Thank you
Tech enthusiasts jumped the AI hype bandwagon with companies, and online forums skew how much of an incentive AI is to buy new hardware. Will there be people who upgrade because of it? Sure. Will it be in statistically significant numbers? I doubt it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1Peace
Since Apple gives zero 🤬 about eye health, UI design, temporal dithering and PWM, what is the point for me as a person from so-called “less than 10%” users to buy a new iPhone? I was so happy when my 11 Pro died so I can finally replace it with simple SE (which isn’t ideal either and uses dithering to fake 10 bit color space), I have ruined my perfectly poor eyesight with this one. How come Apple…

Yes design is fancy, I always liked squared corners (and hated rounded ones), camera is good, fast processor, some AI crap I will probably use once in a long long while and… that’s it! For all this stuff, even my cheap iPhone is OK.

I am not seeing where they expect high demand to come from either. Market is oversaturated, AI probably won’t help no matter how tech giants pushing it
 
Last year with non-pro models? Next year there'll be the SE, the two iPhone Pros and the Apple Phone (iPhone 'slim')
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jovijoker
Between Apple Intelligence and the new chips, I wonder if the iPhone 16 is going to be one of those iPhone models where it seems like everyone and their mother is upgrading to it... kind of like when the iPhone 6 and the iPhone X came out? 🤔
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jovijoker
I like the way Apple is integrating AI, but I think it may be a few years before it's integrated smoothly. That said, my upgrade decision from the 13 Pro is more based on good color options. I have the green one,I go caseless, and ai love how it looks.
 
Article (as of right now) states that the current A17 Pro is manufactured on N3E. I don't think that's right. It was the very first commercial 3nm chip so at the time of release it was referred to as being a N3B product by the techosphere in general.

Now there were also rumors prior to release that a different A17 would be made on N3E later on, however I don't recall reading anywhere that such plans have reached fruition.
This was my understanding too, that the A17 Pro was manufactured on the more expensive N3B process (with lower yield).

As with the M3 it would not be offered after production of the iPhone 15 Pro was ceased - it would be too costly to continue manufacturing on the N3B process for potentially years as the iPhone 16 moves down the tiers.

Obviously this would leave Apple in a pickle as the iPhone 14 and 15 used a version of the Pro tier model CPU from the generation before (which had an extra GPU core).

The 15 uses an A16 CPU which comes with just 6Gb RAM so it probably couldn't be used again as it would be 2 generations old and without sufficient RAM to run the Apple Intelligence by Apple's own declaration.

Therefore there's 2 options:

1. The A17Pro gets a do-over on the N3E process and gets used in the iPhone 16. They'd either get to call it A17 (not pro) or the article suggests a CPU called A18 (but it's really an A17 on the 'new' process). Why would the marketing folks care what it's called though unless they wanted people to be confident it could cope with Apple Intelligence?

2. Apple do an 'A18 Pro' CPU for iPhone 18 Pro, and create a real but binned A18 (non Pro) for the iPhone 16 - all on the N3E process. I think this is more likely - and Apple could then return to the iPhone 17 with a less binned A18 next year. Yes, add a GPU core back :)

Imagine also that the AppleTV could get the (binned?) A18 as well, especially if Apple decide it can be used to hand off AI requests from devices such as Home Hub and Apple Watch, and older iPhones if the user is at home.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.