Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Did they ever fix that issue where if you quit Apple Music it deletes not only all your Apple Music downloads but a bunch of your purchased music and songs ripped from CDs as well?
I specifically turned off Sync because of this. A good chunk of my music is from other sources ("Included digital download" are my 3 favourite wrods), a good chunk of my music is not on iTunes, and I LOATHE having to do EVERYTHING on my phone when it comes to creating playlists.

I barely use Apple Music as is; so long as I can still actually PURCHASE my music (because I DO.NOT.STREAM, FFS stop pigeon-holing me into one, maybe 2 genres), then I'm good.

Things I would love? When I create a playlist, let me choose a default sort/view setting, rather than making me remove artwork, artist & album, and then showing track numbers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: josehill
original post said:
The move will lead to significant improvements to the performance and experience of using the Music app, but no significant UI or interface changes.

In other words, same awful interface, but with the ability to push crappy recommendations and thinly disguised ads for Apple "services" faster than ever!

It does have lossless. It just looks like it’s from 1995.

You say that like that's a bad thing. 🤣

Even if it's not the most "elegant" interface, iTunes made a lot of sense for people who like to manage their own music and podcasts. I've kept my home mac on Mojave specifically to avoid Apple's newer media apps, but I do need to move to a newer OS for other reasons. When I move to a new version of macOS on my Mac, I'll be moving my iTunes environment to a Windows machine.
 
The problem with the Music app is that it is essentially two apps in one.

The old iTunes app and then bundled in, essentially a browser that renders AppleMusic.com.

They really should make a decision, are they going to go full browser like Spotify or are they going to full native like iTunes used to be. The half-way house is the problem.
That's literally what they have done. It's all native now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: srbNYC
According to some sites this is already built and in the beta version. I'm seeing small improvements (no complete reload of the first three tabs - listen now, browse and radio) but overall not a massive improvement - yet....
 
ANYTHING to fix the current mac app. Its utterly unusable. I just play off of my phone app and airplay it to one of my speakers even while on my laptop.
 
Oh my god yes
I’m reasonably satisfied with Apple Music as a service but using it on macOS is just painful with the disguised webviews constantly messing up

Hopefully they will also make the navigation less counter intuitive

I agree I feel like apple music has made significant steps towards having a better curated playlists, but the app itself is slow and lacking what I believe to be a lot of basic features that spotify has had for literal years.
 
Are you aware of an alternative Music app I could try that is able to support dolby and Apple Music library? I know there are quite a few for iOS but cannot find anything for Mac
 
In other words, same awful interface, but with the ability to push crappy recommendations and thinly disguised ads for Apple "services" faster than ever!



You say that like that's a bad thing. 🤣

Even if it's not the most "elegant" interface, iTunes made a lot of sense for people who like to manage their own music and podcasts. I've kept my home mac on Mojave specifically to avoid Apple's newer media apps, but I do need to move to a newer OS for other reasons. When I move to a new version of macOS on my Mac, I'll be moving my iTunes environment to a Windows machine.
This guys found a way to bring iTunes up to Big Sur, might work for Monterey as well, but I did not tested it
 
  • Like
Reactions: josehill
This guys found a way to bring iTunes up to Big Sur, might work for Monterey as well, but I did not tested it
Works perfectly on Monterey, but not for Apple Silicon unfortunately
 
  • Sad
Reactions: srbNYC
My thoughts exactly. SwiftUI would be a much better choice and would allow Apple to share significant portions of the code between platforms.
SwiftUI is not ready for prime time. And I’m not sure if It ever will be. Using it is a huge paradigm shift. The documentation for it is abysmal, and designing the whole UI in code, rather than visually with Interface Builder like you do with Appkit is a huge step backwards.

And It doesn’t really make it much easier when writing cross-platform code. Too many things don’t work the same. Too many gotchas.

I’m not sure what apple are thinking TBH
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Mr. Awesome
SwiftUI is not ready for prime time. And I’m not sure if It ever will be. Using it is a huge paradigm shift. The documentation for it is abysmal, and designing the whole UI in code, rather than visually with Interface Builder like you do with Appkit is a huge step backwards.

And It doesn’t really make it much easier when writing cross-platform code. Too many things don’t work the same. Too many gotchas.

I’m not sure what apple are thinking TBH
It is a paradigm shift, yes, but in a good direction. And you can still build your interfaces visually using the Canvas. SwiftUI just simplifies development and state handling dramatically.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Localcelebrity
Wonder if it’s for M1 boxes only.
Unlikely. They'll want to have as broad backward support as they can to keep subscribers. Also, while I know nothing about JET, if it's a web technology there would be nothing in the code that would require the new architecture or be handled inherently better by it.
 
It's worse than ever! The cursor jumps out of the search field as you type, and it frequently crashes when searching. on my M1 MBP it doesn't track the screen position of the pointer properly, and plays a song different from the one that I double-click to play (it doesn't do this on my 2019 Retina 5K iMac). AirPlay frequently doesn't work with my HomePods - the animation shows that it is playing the song, but the sound doesn't come through the HomePods. Ugh! Is anyone QAing this thing?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ErikGrim
SwiftUI is not ready for prime time. And I’m not sure if It ever will be. Using it is a huge paradigm shift. The documentation for it is abysmal, and designing the whole UI in code, rather than visually with Interface Builder like you do with Appkit is a huge step backwards.

And It doesn’t really make it much easier when writing cross-platform code. Too many things don’t work the same. Too many gotchas.

I’m not sure what apple are thinking TBH
Sorry to awaken an old thread!

It’s not just me …. https://mjtsai.com/blog/2022/05/24/swiftui-in-2022/

Hopefully Apple will announce some major improvements to SwiftUI at WWDC from tomorrow
 
It's a native rendering of the Apple Music backend. Anything AM related that was rendered as a webview before is now much more responsive.

Really? As of when "Monterey" ?

It makes no difference then, it's still slow and sluggish. Takes too long to search and takes too long to start playing tracks.
I'd really like the speed from clicking play on a track to it's actually starting to be faster. If I want to very quickly skip through a search result it's laboursome - that was the one thing Spotify had right, it felt like every track in their library was downloaded to my desktop.
This sometimes happens on iOS as well to be fair - sometimes stuff starts quite quickly other times it seems to freeze and you have to stop and try again or skip through the track.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ratspg
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.