Everything I've said could be said about a lot large developments, which doesn't make it wrong. In fact all of that prior experience tells us that it's right.
I don't need to give credit. This is a well known and very deeply studied issue, not an idea I've come up entirely on my own. Understand that this concept came from Steve Jobs, who despite his other talents was not an architect. This building will properly be seen as a monument to him, which I suspect was the idea. I doubt very much that this concept would have been suggested by any architect because of all the inherent problems it creates.
I guess my point here is that while many of your assertions may in the end be validated, the fifteen basically identical architectural-glass covered block buildings that make up the Cisco Campus, and the six identical cylindrical architectural glass towers that make up the Oracle campus share the same climate and very similar employee density and don't suffer from these problems on a day-to-day basis. (I have been on both).
Granted Jobs was well known for his heavy hand, and no doubt this was a pet project for which he had final say, but he was not the architect. Ultimately that credit resides with Foster + Partners. Which is not some local business park contractor executing on some clueless CEOs vision, but a significant architectural firm that has addressed these same sorts of problems in numerous projects around the world.