Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.


Apple today updated its U.S. Apple Card Monthly Installment plan to require those who use the feature to purchase an iPhone that is linked to AT&T, Verizon, or T-Mobile. With this change, the Apple Card Monthly Installment plan can no longer be used to purchase a SIM-free iPhone.

apple-card-feature2.jpg

All iPhones purchased through the Apple Card Monthly Installment plan are unlocked so carrier switching is available at any point, but at purchase, customers will need to have a plan with a supported carrier. Buying a SIM-free iPhone and linking it to a carrier like Mint Mobile will no longer be possible using installments.

Apple announced these changes in an updated support document back in June, and the monthly installment plan has officially been updated. Prior to now, Apple Card installments could be used to purchase an iPhone online with the option to connect to a carrier at a later date, which allowed customers to buy an iPhone and then link it to any carrier of their choosing.

Apple already required customers using Apple Card installments to choose one of the main three carriers when in stores, and now the online policy matches the in-store policy.

With the Apple Card Monthly Installment plan, Apple Card holders can pay for their devices over a 24-month period with 0% APR and 3% Daily Cash back on payments.

Apple today is also changing the monthly installment term for the Apple Watch, and customers will be required to pay off the device over 12 months instead of 24 months. Apple now uses a 12-month term for Apple Watch, Macs, displays, and iPads, with the 24-month term limited to the iPhone.

Article Link: Apple Card Monthly Financing No Longer Available for SIM-Free iPhones
Tim Cook is turning into an abysmal CEO
 
I knew the days of free money were going to end. 24 month 0 interest is free money and only a fool would not bite. especially with CDs paying 5.4% APR.

good while it lasted, I bet GS lost big on that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: compwiz1202
I'm on a major carrier and am at least another year away from an upgrade if not longer but this drastically changes my opinion on Apple for the worse. I'm shocked they would throw a large segment of their customers directly under the bus like this just because they aren't giving more money monthly to the big three.
 
  • Like
Reactions: darkslide29
I'm shocked they would throw a large segment of their customers directly under the bus like this just because they aren't giving more money monthly to the big three.
Speculation — one mentioned by others as well:

Apple’s poor planning, including probable assumptions about how much they had leverage, in creating the Apple Card is causing a shockwave of struggles and, in this aspect, wireless carriers are likely taking advantage of that, offering to jump back in on financing/subsidizing as long as Apple returns to somewhat locking customers into plans. Basically, Apple exec arrogance apparently navigated them into a chasm.
 
Last edited:
Many telecom carriers (i.e. Verizon, ATT, T-Mobile, Xfinity Mobile, Mint Mobile, etc...) have their Unlocking policy published online but searching for it is a hassle, as they know most people don't bother trying to learn about it.
At least Verizon states that it'll automatically unlock the iphone after 60 days whereas the Xfinity Mobile subscriber must contact the carrier after 60 days and goes through steps to unlock the smartphone.
It depends on each carrier's unlocking policy.
Yeah I was mostly referring to doing it automatically and the end user not have to do anything.
 
We have T-mobile, and I just tried….if I use the Apple Store app to order an iPhone today on Apple Card payments over 24 months, it requires me to choose a carrier ( in this case I chose T-mobile), but then proceeds through checkout for delivery today or via shipping as before. Doesn’t ask me at all provide my tmobile info. So looks like functionally in regards to ordering other than clicking “t-mobile”, and esp it iPhone is unlocked anyways, nothing really changes for me in terms of ordering via Apple card payments as its not really asking me about any of my account info. Am I missing something?
If they're not doing any type of check then what's the point of what Apple's doing? Didn't the article still say the phone is unlocked no matter which carrier you choose?
 
  • Like
Reactions: compwiz1202
We have T-mobile, and I just tried….if I use the Apple Store app to order an iPhone today on Apple Card payments over 24 months, it requires me to choose a carrier ( in this case I chose T-mobile), but then proceeds through checkout for delivery today or via shipping as before. Doesn’t ask me at all provide my tmobile info. So looks like functionally in regards to ordering other than clicking “t-mobile”, and esp it iPhone is unlocked anyways, nothing really changes for me in terms of ordering via Apple card payments as its not really asking me about any of my account info. Am I missing something?
So, you reached the “Place Order” or equivalent button/step? Bacause the wording makes it seem you’ll need to select a wireless/cell plan (current or new).

Apple-Store_iPhone_finance-options.pngApple-Store_iPhone_carrier-connect.png
 
Unfortunately, this is the entire reason I HAVE the Apple Card—24mo financing for an unlocked phone. So…I mean, yeah I’ll save, but my immediate incentive to upgrade to the 15PM is zero. Apple, what are you DOING, bruh!?
 
It’s most likely to prevent rampant fraud and from other countries loading US stock for their countries and making crap tons of money. Just put in your mobile phone number or pay with your own money. You’ll be fine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hal~9000
Unfortunately, this is the entire reason I HAVE the Apple Card—24mo financing for an unlocked phone. So…I mean, yeah I’ll save, but my immediate incentive to upgrade to the 15PM is zero. Apple, what are you DOING, bruh!?
It’s literally still unlocked. Did you read?
 
  • Like
Reactions: MsMag
Is it possible that its not carriers but Apple pushing for this of their own accord in order to drive acquisition of iPhone Upgrade Plan users?

Or - and this is possible too - it's a way to dissuade resellers. When I worked in Apple stores, 10 years ago, it was a common occurrence on iPhone launch days to be inundated by obvious resellers (large groups of people all together, all paying cash, only buying unlocked phones). My experience was before Apple Card, so if resellers could get 0% financing on new unlocked iPhones, they could then turn around and resell them before needing to pay a single monthly payment, and even if they had to pay a monthly payment there's no risk to them so long as they can sell it at the same price as purchased.

Oooooor the carriers colluded with Apple to convince them or pay them to change their policy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hal~9000
The first middle finger was Apple charging an extra $30 or so for an unlocked phone. This is the second middle finger.
They are currently all the same price, regardless of whether they ship with a carrier's eSIM. Hopefully, they wont't revert back when the 15s come out. None of them currently ship carrier locked.
 
losing the SIM card tray in the States really effected my business. We base in the States but spend much of our time working in developing nations were e-sim is limited to monthly contracts on local carriers. No other local option. This has really been a pain for my employees.
Why is Apple so beholden to U.S. carriers?
 
  • Like
Reactions: zinacef
Even with this change, it's still better than the early iPhone years when Apple forced/pushed buyers to sign up for a 2 year AT&T contract (in the U.S., other carriers elsewhere) in order to buy an iPhone.

Well yeah that's because (at a time before their dominance) Apple managed to convince the CEO of AT&T to just once, ONCE try putting out a phone that's not absolutely riddled with adware. He agreed, but only if it was an exclusive. It remains one of the legendary business deals in all of tech history. An example of where, just once, someone managed to pull a telco CEO's head out of his ass long enough to see the light. And of course only legendary negotiator Steve Jobs could pull it off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DotCom2
For everyone but the stockholders... and they are, after all, his "boss".

As a stockholder I would like to see some moves that are a little less blatantly aggressive about giving control back to the telcos. First eSIM only, now this.

I really, really, (really) hate to say it, but Apple is putting themselves into a position where as a PHONE, Android is a better choice for too many reasons. If you want a computer that you can just buy and use without a telco dictating how you buy it and Apple micromanaging how you use it, get a Mac.

The ecosystem is extremely effective, the pain of switching is still greater than the pain of staying on iPhone (I switched away from Android for several reasons, after all) but it's not on a great trajectory.
 
There won't be much left to make this a card worth using soon...

I did like their relatively easy expense management and "no fees" approach, but then they kicked the interest rate up so high God help you if you miss even one month with even a small balance. Wipes out all potential savings. And it seems Goldman Sachs is very unhappy with the "no fees" approach.

I was going to buy the new iPhone and finance it on the card but now I'm pretty much decided to just express replace my iPhone 13 before AppleCare runs out and just stick with it another few years. If I could have bought it on zero interest I would have done it, now it has cost them a sale because I don't need it that bad. I'll just wait.
 
  • Like
Reactions: k1121j and Hal~9000
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.