Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Maybe it's just because they don't have any new features to put in them. They're just router/switch/DHCP/wifi combos like everything else, plus some nice application features. The only changes in the past 10 years were the wifi antennas and standards.

Last gen AEBS is the best combo box we've owned, currently have it installed at my parents' house.
 
Last edited:
A standalone hardwired USB drive with CCC for back up is what I am using now and it works perfectly.
Fine if that's your use case. Time Capsule is good for shared backup environments, e.g. a family, or if you want to back up wirelessly without having to worry about plugging it in. Also, it's best if your backup is in a safe location that won't necessarily be so accessible. I used to have both local and network TM backups.
 
Last edited:
I also have a time capsule I bought a couple yrs ago when I bought my Mac mini.

So does this mean if I buy a 2nd one now before there gone that Apple won't support it down the road? I like it so much that if the one I'm using breaks I want a back up but if they don't support it??
 
Airplay from iTunes can be sent to multiple devices. Can Chromecast do this?
Airfoil apparently added Chromecast support, but I believe it is in beta right now.

There are numerous third party AirPlay audio devices out there ( also there are still a lot ot the Airport Express units of the last couple of generations still available on Amazon) if you just want it for music. As I mentioned earlier, Chromecast is limited in comparison to AirPlay for iOS users. Unless Apple gets rid of it on iOS, I will continue to use it. There isn't any more reason to move on now than there was yesterday.

Also, I have one of the Airport Express units out in our Sunroom. It gets freezing cold in winter and over 100 degrees in the summer and has been going strong for over two years in that environment. Those things are resilient.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sudo1996
Now this is sad. I know Airports were never the greatest routers on the market but they were very reliable, setup and forget and they looked nicer compared to some of the alien-esque items on offer I'd rather not have on display (look like toys from a teenagers Transformers shelf!)
In my experience, the Apple routers have at least been more reliable than whatever the cable company installed at home: Actiontec, Surfboard, and 2Wire. Haven't had any issues with speed either. And they're pretty full-featured, better than most consumer routers.

And yeah, as you said, they're so easy to set up. I'm sick of dealing with the garbage router combos my grandma keeps getting. Was it really worth the $30 saved to make me drive to her house every time the stuff broke?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ssgbryan
They're expensive, but Sonos still offers their older Connect products for integrating existing speakers into their system.
 
Tim Cook is under the gun to keep profits growing. "Low-margin" products (anything less than 40%) are on the chopping block, sacrificed in the name of short-term gains. Ultimately it's all very short-sighted—as the influencers and Apple lifers leave behind the company's increasingly gaunt "ecosystem" for greener pastures—but it will give Tim Cook a few more quarters of job security.

Exactly right.

That is exactly what Tim Cooks recent performance is, shortermism at its finest. Sales on the slide? Put the prices up :rolleyes:

Not going to get away with that for long.
 
I'm concerned as well since my in-ceiling speakers throughout the house are linked to different Airport Express devices as zones that we airplay to. I'm not sure what I'm going to do once they start to break. My speaker system throughout the house will be useless.
You buy old ones. We've still got first-gen AirPort Express units in our house serving AirPlay, having replaced one or two failed units with used ones from eBay. Main concern is AirPlay support on Apple devices, but the Apple TV still has it, so I doubt Apple will get rid of it.
 
Because time machine is far more stable on time capsule than anything else short of a standalone hardwired USB drive.

Seriously, can't recommend synology's stuff highly enough. Been using two of their NASs for years as time machine targets, and they work great. And their software is a joy to use.

Haven't tried their router, but it uses similar software and also supports time machine, and I bet it's also great.
 
Tim Cook is under the gun to keep profits growing. "Low-margin" products (anything less than 40%) are on the chopping block, sacrificed in the name of short-term gains. Ultimately it's all very short-sighted—as the influencers and Apple lifers leave behind the company's increasingly gaunt "ecosystem" for greener pastures—but it will give Tim Cook a few more quarters of job security.
I agree that Apple is doing this, but I don't get why. So what if it's lower margin? As long as there is a profit, it should be fine!
 
  • Like
Reactions: sunwukong
Maybe it's just because they don't have any new features to put in them. They're just router/switch/DHCP/wifi combos like everything else, plus some nice application features. The only changes in the past 10 years were the wifi antennas and standards.

Last gen AEBS is the best combo box we've owned, currently have it installed at my parents' house.


Mesh routing, new 802.11 standards, HomeKit hub, Alexa-like capability are all obvious things they could add.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sunwukong
I don't know, there's still room for Apple to innovate with their wireless routers. They could, for instance, replace the ethernet and USB ports with USB-C ports. Or maybe they could make it thinner and lighter. Or how about a choice of colors?

Seriously, the routers were always overpriced, but I willingly paid the Apple tax in order to have a seamless, well-integrated environment. What Apple has been doing lately is just mind boggling. For the first time, I am seriously looking at Windows laptops as I have lost faith in Apple's long-term commitment to the Mac.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ssgbryan and heffsf
I am not surprised Apple did this. I mean, you could get as much capability of the Airport Extreme with the excellent Asus RT-AC68U for at least US$30 less money.


I have the same router...try hooking it up to an Airport extended network...try stability in NYC with over 90 wifi networks you have to compete with. I then went out and bought an Apple Airport extreme. It works so well. The Asus is now a repeater to the Airport.
 
Unless Apple gets rid of it on iOS, I will continue to use it. There isn't any more reason to move on now than there was yesterday.

Maybe, maybe not. If they stop with security updates then it is time. I personally have been weary of the lack of updates the AE has received over the past few years. I don't know if they didn't need it or if the product line was forgot about. Regardless, hearing Bloomberg report they are closing the router division does not inspire confidence. I am now loooing close at Synology and Eero. Would be nice to have DynDNS support but not a deal breaker.


Also, I have one of the Airport Express units out in our Sunroom. It gets freezing cold in winter and over 100 degrees in the summer and has been going strong for over two years in that environment. Those things are resilient.

I can agree with your statement. They are tough. I have several outdoors under a roof and they have worked without issue for many years now. They are the older style with audio jack. They are in a concrete manufacture environment and are covered with concrete but still function.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.