Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Autism ACCEPTANCE month? Do people not accept autism? Shouldn't it be Autism Awareness month?
The ability of autistic people in writing software is found to be 10x beyond the regular population. Companies like Apple can benefit from this.
[doublepost=1459962363][/doublepost]
Of course, don't you? I had the opportunity to speak with someone in the military about the topic and they affirmed that there are various spray operations, mainly SRM. As the Sun is going to sleep now, there should be a noticeable decrease in spray operations. I believe there is also a vid out there of NASA project manager being recorded on phone and acknowledging the term Chemtrail. It's most hazardous when it falls with precipitation

To get a really interesting view on chemtrails, look at the perspective from Ham Radio operators. There are several cases of Hams reflecting their amateur band signals off active chemtrail sprays due to the amount of metallic compounds in the materials making up chemtrails. Other hams have found that during chemtrail spraying, there has been intense activity of X and K bands typically reserved for radar.

Why? Many hams believe that chemtrails are part of a program to produce an RF reflective waveguide in the atmosphere so terrestrial radar can reflect to the other side of the world for scanning and imaging of foreign enemy facilities. Thus, you can spy on inland facilities without the use of an identifiable spy satellite going overhead catching them off guard. There is a lot of this on-line.
 
Last edited:
On NBC’s Today Show, Robert De Niro just broke his trance and started talking sense about vaccines. He refused to back down and knuckle under. Watch the interview here.

It’s the leading edge of a new storm.

De Niro wouldn’t accept the canned notion that vaccines are remarkably safe and effective and necessary. He expressed doubts. He linked vaccines to autism. He stood with the mothers who know their children were tragically damaged after being vaccinated.

Bang: Robert De Niro wakes up and opens up on vaccines
 
  • Like
Reactions: sailmac
And I should trust an actor's opinion on the topic of vaccines why? YOU need a lesson on the fallacy of authority:


If you'd care to argue acting, film making, and such, then De Niro's opinions will be invaluable and valid. If you're going to argue the validity of vaccines, however, then please give me De Niro's credentials in biochemistry, microbiology, pharmaceuticals and medical degree. Then maybe I'll give a f*ck for his opinion on this subject. If you can't present such credentials, then De Niro's opinion has about the same level of validity as anyone else's who is ill-informed on the topic. Zero.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jaymc
The authorities you and the fellow sheep in your herd rely on are crooks. There are criminals with academic degrees, lots of them. An academic degree by itself is no guarantee for truth.
And the ability to be a great actor is no guarantee for truth either. So. Why believe De Niro or his wife? The point is this: anyone can lie, yes. But people without training or expertise in infections and the preventing of them can't offer any factual information on the subject of vaccines with authority. All they can offer is that they "feel this" or "believe that." And that doesn't hold up as proof in science, in life or in court. And thank goodness for that. Otherwise, I could "feel" that you're a murderer of children and be believed even if I had no evidence. Should the world act on my "feelings" and throw you in jail for what I absolutely believe you did, or would you rather that the world act on factual information? Wouldn't you rather that I be forced to PROVE you guilty with verfiable facts?
Robert De Niro's wife seemed convinced that in the case of their autistic child there was a link to vaccines.
And, again, I should trust her why? What are her facts? What studies and research has she done that validates her claim?

Evidently you, she and Mr. Di Niro need a simple lesson in another and very important logical fallacy. Please try to watch this one this time. Because when you use such fallacies, you undermine any chance of anyone taking your assertions seriously (ditto for Mrs. & Mr. Di Niro):

It's impossible to wake someone up that is pretending to sleep.
Exactly. I really wish you'd stop pretending to be asleep and give the waking world a try. Oh, wait, did you mean me? Hm. Ad hominem argument that. If you can't present facts to win the argument, attack the person. Tsk, tsk. You really need to do better than that if you want me or anyone else to take you seriously. And I hope for your sake, that you're never accused of a crime that people believe you've commited irregardless of the facts. Because that's what you're doing here. You're believing everyone's claims of vaccines committing this crime, whether or not the facts prove it. By this reasoning, you could easily be thrown in jail for not doing a thing. So long as some famous actor's wife THINKS and BELIEVES you commited the crime, you will be judged guilty.

Well, as you say, you can't get through to someone who puts their hands over their ears and says "la-la-la! I'm not listening!" Enjoy your scary nightmares.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Night Spring
You're a complete moron. Does a typewriter have speech output? But do you have a speech or language impairment? Go back into your parents basement.
Thanks for prooving me wrong. Now I understand that thanks to iPads even autistic kids can post on Macrumors forums.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.