It's not that Tim Cook is saying, "having lunch with me is worth $100K", I'm not sure whether you're setting that up as a strawman. People don't pay that kind of money as a "fair purchase price" for a bit of Tim's time, they do it because it's for a good cause. It's not arrogance. It's the folks running the auction who are saying, "we've seen these kinds of items going for prices in that ballpark in the past". Apple donating 1 billion to charity would likely raise serious complaints from stockholders. And neither you nor I know how much Tim Cook donates personally to charity, he doesn't exactly announce it.Really, while I am sure the auction will raise a lot of money, the assumption this experience is worth $100,000 just shows how completely out of touch with reality these CEO's and companies are these days.
Just put on the auction, but get rid of the arrogance of assuming some ridiculous value for this experience. Better yet, just donate 1 billion to charity considering Apple is sitting on $250 billion in cash reserves.
Leave it to the torches and pitchforks crowd in the MacRumors forums to vomit their self-righteous bitterness all over somebody doing a good thing for charity.If I had thousands and thousands in pocket change to donate for this I would show up to the lunch with a Razer Blade, put it in front of Tim, shake my head, and walk away.
I kinda wish wish this was a raffle, rather than a largest bank balance competition.
People could donate that directly.It's not that Tim Cook is saying, "having lunch with me is worth $100K", I'm not sure whether you're setting that up as a strawman. People don't pay that kind of money as a "fair purchase price" for a bit of Tim's time, they do it because it's for a good cause. It's not arrogance. It's the folks running the auction who are saying, "we've seen these kinds of items going for prices in that ballpark in the past". Apple donating 1 billion to charity would likely raise serious complaints from stockholders. And neither you nor I know how much Tim Cook donates personally to charity, he doesn't exactly announce it.
[doublepost=1493748028][/doublepost]Leave it to the torches and pitchforks crowd in the MacRumors forums to vomit their self-righteous bitterness all over somebody doing a good thing for charity.
Aside from the Charity lunch with meeting Mr. Cook, I would really look forward to the Tour of Apple Park personally.
Ask him, why his company spends the lowest rate on charity, %-wise.
I have no time to lunch with the greatest penny-pincher in the world
BTW More sincere, and NOT always about money:
MacRumors 2017 Blood Drive
http://bfy.tw/BYV8How much money does Apple donate to charity? Post a link, please...
http://******.com/?q=Apple+donation+charity
(be sure it would be in the financial reporting if more than 1% of earnings => so it ain't)
As I explained, this is merely about personal profiling than money.
http://******.com/?q=Apple+donation+charity
(be sure it would be in the financial reporting if more than 1% of earnings => so it ain't)
As I explained, this is merely about personal profiling than money.
Here you go Googlebetes: http://bfy.tw/BYV8So, in another words, you are deflecting away from what Citysnaps asked you. Your link you provided is useless and doesn't even open.
Here you go Googlebetes: http://bfy.tw/BYV8
I am not feeling the slightest obligation towards you.You still have not provided a number. Please answer my question.
I am not feeling the slightest obligation towards you.
And why would I ?
As Apple is obliged to report substantial amounts, it would be in the financial reporting system if more than 1% of earnings => so it ain't. So I stand by my statement.
Go have lunch with Tim and ask him.
Lol...and your post isn't sanctimonious? Making *a joke* about what I'd say to Tim means I hate charity and am a self righteous tool... I own an iPhone, iPad, and Apple TV. Hopefully one day I'll come back to a MBP.It's not that Tim Cook is saying, "having lunch with me is worth $100K", I'm not sure whether you're setting that up as a strawman. People don't pay that kind of money as a "fair purchase price" for a bit of Tim's time, they do it because it's for a good cause. It's not arrogance. It's the folks running the auction who are saying, "we've seen these kinds of items going for prices in that ballpark in the past". Apple donating 1 billion to charity would likely raise serious complaints from stockholders. And neither you nor I know how much Tim Cook donates personally to charity, he doesn't exactly announce it.
[doublepost=1493748028][/doublepost]Leave it to the torches and pitchforks crowd in the MacRumors forums to vomit their self-righteous bitterness all over somebody doing a good thing for charity.
1% of $240 Billion would seem substantial to me (= half of all European 3rd world aid combined)You made a strong assertion about Apple's charitable giving. Was genuinely curious if your claim was based on fact, or if you were just making stuff up.
With respect to your assertion on required reporting, help me out with the maths... Is 1% of 2016 earnings substantial?
I've never seen one in person lol. You know why no one uses the "selling like hot cakes" anymore? Hot cake sales tanked many moon agoIf I had thousands and thousands in pocket change to donate for this I would show up to the lunch with a Razer Blade, put it in front of Tim, shake my head, and walk away. If a company like Razer can make the Blade (and sell it like hot cakes) Apple has no excuse.