I haven't proven your point. I've pointed out that your response was exactly whataboutism. I also pointed out that a person is to be judged on their own actions, and not be excused because the actions of someone else were also reprehensible.
/sigh
So you proved my point by not at least acknowledging my point that those complaining (from one side only) here don't acknowledge the corruption from their own side, they only point out the perceived corruption from "the other".
Had TC contributed $1 million to 46's inauguration fund, how many complaining in this thread would have done so then?
I clearly addressed my concerns about "whataboutchulism" in my previous post, but you chose to ignore that and try to make it the focus, ignoring all the facts I referenced.
At least I am willing to acknowledge the field is dirty, regardless of side, others are not, and proclaim their side "free of sin" when it is clearly not. Glass houses, stones and such.
Is 47 the best representation of the values I vote for? No. Was 47 the best chance at furthering the issues I vote for, yes. Our system is flawed, no doubt, but it is better than most. If
you one doesn't think so, move to Iran or North Korea.
The willingness to acknowledge the shortcomings of your side is part the path to bipartisanship, centrism, etc. If you cannot acknowledge the shortcomings of your team, you are part of the problem.