Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Unsurprisingly, what a boring boring man.

Never mind the Ware podcast, he should have looked up his kindred spirit (a fellow grey-skinned bean counter and former statesman) whilst in the UK…

IMG_8247.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: AndiG and 9081094
This might be one of my favorite articles on this site. We know Cook the CEO but I don't feel like we know the man. Something I've always wondered (and I don't think it was asked) was how does Cook use the apple watch. What are his ring goals and did he help come up with some if the designs like the national park design.

I had a nice time reading this article.
 
Tim Cook, story of success:

- **2011:** “I presented the best iPhone ever.”
- **2012:** “I presented the best iPhone ever.”
- **2013:** “I presented the best iPhone ever.”
- **2014:** “I presented the best iPhone ever.”
- **2015:** “I presented the best iPhone ever.”
- **2016:** “I presented the best iPhone ever.”
- **2017:** “I presented the best iPhone ever.”
- **2018:** “I presented the best iPhone ever.”
- **2019:** “I presented the best iPhone ever.”
- **2020:** “I presented the best iPhone ever.”
- **2021:** “I presented the best iPhone ever.”
- **2022:** “I presented the best iPhone ever.”
- **2023:** “I presented the best iPhone ever.”
- **2024:** “I presented the best iPhone ever.”

and the saga continues …
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9081094
Lots of interesting information. Definitely planning on listening to whole interview within the next few days.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mganu
I bet he spends at least 4 hours a day waiting patiently for his AVP to charge
He can use the 4 hours he’s sleeping…
I think it’s interesting to hear the routine of what must be a most demanding ceo life and schedule.
Indeed, I’d like to know more about the daily routine of such an high level CEO. It would be interesting.
No children, no pets, no legacy. He's a strange man. The Cook years will be forgotten.
The Cooks years won’t be forgotten in Apple, since he made the company what it is today (something Steve Jobs didn’t ).
Tim Cook, story of success:

- **2011:** “I presented the best iPhone ever.”
- **2012:** “I presented the best iPhone ever.”
- **2013:** “I presented the best iPhone ever.”
- **2014:** “I presented the best iPhone ever.”
- **2015:** “I presented the best iPhone ever.”
- **2016:** “I presented the best iPhone ever.”
- **2017:** “I presented the best iPhone ever.”
- **2018:** “I presented the best iPhone ever.”
- **2019:** “I presented the best iPhone ever.”
- **2020:** “I presented the best iPhone ever.”
- **2021:** “I presented the best iPhone ever.”
- **2022:** “I presented the best iPhone ever.”
- **2023:** “I presented the best iPhone ever.”
- **2024:** “I presented the best iPhone ever.”

and the saga continues …
It really makes me laugh when people criticize one of the most successful CEO in the whole world economic history with silly jokes like that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I’m not surprised he doesn’t cook if he starts work at 5AM! He must be in bed by 9PM or earlier. Lot of dedication but that’s how you reach the top.
 
Turns out that even if you're ungodly rich, you still have to sit on the toilet and take a dump like the rest of us
 
Last edited:
The Cooks years won’t be forgotten in Apple, since he made the company what it is today (something Steve Jobs didn’t ).
Why do people always saying this about Steve? Steve literally brought Apple from the dead and the company was making more and more money every year until he died. Apple surpassed Microsoft as the most valuable tech company in the world a year before Steve died. Steve’s Apple came up with all the revolutionary products and services. What makes you think that Apple wouldn’t be as successful as it is today with him? Tim only inherited all of that and works hard to keep that trajectory.
 
Why do people always saying this about Steve? Steve literally brought Apple from the dead and the company was making more and more money every year until he died. Apple surpassed Microsoft as the most valuable tech company in the world a year before Steve died. Steve’s Apple came up with all the revolutionary products and services. What makes you think that Apple wouldn’t be as successful as it is today with him? Tim only inherited all of that and works hard to keep that trajectory.
Quite. Cook painted another man’s fence.
 
While it's irrelevant I do like this sort of interviews to learn about this side of people.

Watching Mr Cook tastes I would invite him to visit our country. I'm pretty certain we could impress him with some exquisite fresh fish. We might even get him to open an Apple Store.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9081094
It really makes me laugh when people criticize one of the most successful CEO in the whole world economic history with silly jokes like that.
There are always two sides. Yes, Tim Cook is awesome at selling products Jobs created. Maybe Apple cracks the $4 trillion mark soon. But on the other hand, he hasn't led Apple in a way that creates new revolutionary products or opens bold new markets.

And Tim acts in ways Jobs would have hated:

  • Simplicity vs. Features: Jobs believed in simplicity—fewer features, executed flawlessly, rather than bloating products with unnecessary complexity. Under Cook, Apple products often prioritize feature expansion, even at the cost of user experience, like the growing complexity of iOS or the addition of features that don't seamlessly integrate.
  • Product Fragmentation: When Jobs returned to Apple, one of his first moves was to simplify the product line, cutting unnecessary models to focus on a core set of products. In contrast, Cook’s Apple creates dozens of variations—iPhones with multiple sizes, features, and price tiers, diluting the simplicity Jobs cherished and making Apple feel more like a conventional tech company.
While Cook has steered Apple to unprecedented financial success, these shifts mark a departure from the principles that once defined the company’s innovation and identity.
 
I do miss the earlier days, fresher and more honest
The Steve Jobs leadership for a comparatively tiny pre iPhone Apple with a $73 billion market cap is worlds away from the Apple with a $4 trillion market cap.

In much the same way that the prime minister of Lichtenstein or a tiny South Pacific atoll isn’t really playing on the same level as the leaders of the US, China, the UK or Russia.

I miss those days too, but they only lasted insofar as Apple was a quirky brand of iPods and “those are expensive and artsy fartsy” Mac’s relatively few people were buying.
 
Why do people always saying this about Steve? Steve literally brought Apple from the dead and the company was making more and more money every year until he died. Apple surpassed Microsoft as the most valuable tech company in the world a year before Steve died. Steve’s Apple came up with all the revolutionary products and services. What makes you think that Apple wouldn’t be as successful as it is today with him? Tim only inherited all of that and works hard to keep that trajectory.
Don’t get me wrong: I’m an Apple user since 1989 and I loved Steve. I saw what Apple was without Steve, back in those days. But Steve Jobs had also several limitations in his managerial capability, and Tim Cook, lacking in genius, is very capable manager. He didn’t just keep the trajectory: he skyrocketed Apple in another financial dimension.
Steve Jobs knew about that and made the right choice to put him in command.
There are always two sides. Yes, Tim Cook is awesome at selling products Jobs created. Maybe Apple cracks the $4 trillion mark soon. But on the other hand, he hasn't led Apple in a way that creates new revolutionary products or opens bold new markets.

And Tim acts in ways Jobs would have hated:

  • Simplicity vs. Features: Jobs believed in simplicity—fewer features, executed flawlessly, rather than bloating products with unnecessary complexity. Under Cook, Apple products often prioritize feature expansion, even at the cost of user experience, like the growing complexity of iOS or the addition of features that don't seamlessly integrate.
  • Product Fragmentation: When Jobs returned to Apple, one of his first moves was to simplify the product line, cutting unnecessary models to focus on a core set of products. In contrast, Cook’s Apple creates dozens of variations—iPhones with multiple sizes, features, and price tiers, diluting the simplicity Jobs cherished and making Apple feel more like a conventional tech company.
While Cook has steered Apple to unprecedented financial success, these shifts mark a departure from the principles that once defined the company’s innovation and identity.
As I said above, I loved Jobs, but I’m a very old Apple user, so I know very well every time Steve screwed up. Do not forget we are speaking about the same Steve Jobs of “you’re holding it wrong “.
Steve was a genius, but not in a financial way. Sometimes Jobs’ simplicity meant just lack of features (do you remember first iOS iterations ?).
About product fragmentation, I think Cook is doing a good job limiting that. It is a different market from 2010… Apple cannot afford a single iPhone anymore.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.