Responses
I both agree and disagree. While this thread started off with some pretty lame (and humorous) conjecturing about the causes of Apple's blockage, it switched tracks midway and then moved well beyond Apple. While I generally read this board for Apple related news my comments this time had nothing to do with Mac. Rather, I saw an opportunity to engage in thoughtful conversation with several participants who clearly held reasoned global viewpoints.
Incidentally, while your theory is far more sound than most of the others it is not necessarily correct. As some have mentioned, the logic behind the firewall is often lacking. Moreover, the bamboo is not nationally effective. Therefore, your imperious and condescending tone is both unwarranted and ironic.
India suffers from dreadful infrastructure. Roads, electricity grids, ports and plumbing are at least 30 years behind China. So, while the labor costs of producing computers in the Sub-Continent might be on par with the PRC, Apple would either have to lay down serious upfront cash to build a decent facility with reliable supply lines or put up with subpar operating conditions with even more instability than it currently experiences in Taiwan.
Thailand isn't really set up to manufacture hi-tech equipment. They are a center for textiles and clothing manufacturing but essentially it is a small environmentally sensitive country whose potential (and actual) eco-tourism value is much higher than it would be to strip its rainforests only to play industry catch-up with already established neighbors. Taiwan is, afterall, fairly buffered from the political instabilities of the mainland.
You may have a point with the Philipines. Although, I believe it shares many of the same traits and concerns that I described for India and Thailand.
On a slight tangent... the Apple site being down in China is really no big deal at all. Most people don't speak English there (Trust me, I know from experience dude) and couldn't give two hoots if the English website isn't up. As long as apple.com.cn is still running the only people affected are obsessive weiguoren who should probably be focusing on making the most of their cultural experiences rather than surfing apple's website. Apple's major problem in the region is its relative expense. In a country where even U.S. beige boxes can't compete with the beige-er than beige Chinese knock-offs, an apple computer selling at $1000 or more is a ludicrous expense affordable to very few.
I do somewhat agree with your point about corporate responsibility though. You weren't really arguing this but I strongly believe U.S. companies have an obligation to export not only their products but also the ideals that allowed them to exist in the first place. And I'm not just talking about cut-through meritocracy.
Good Citizen said:All of this speculation is pretty funny. You guys will grasp at just about any straw to find a reason for something that happens in the world of Apple.
I both agree and disagree. While this thread started off with some pretty lame (and humorous) conjecturing about the causes of Apple's blockage, it switched tracks midway and then moved well beyond Apple. While I generally read this board for Apple related news my comments this time had nothing to do with Mac. Rather, I saw an opportunity to engage in thoughtful conversation with several participants who clearly held reasoned global viewpoints.
Incidentally, while your theory is far more sound than most of the others it is not necessarily correct. As some have mentioned, the logic behind the firewall is often lacking. Moreover, the bamboo is not nationally effective. Therefore, your imperious and condescending tone is both unwarranted and ironic.
yamabushi said:I am constantly amazed by companies that ignore or accept the political risk of doing business in China. Apple could build computers just as cheaply in India, Thailand or the Philippines without the political risks to business involved with dealing with a totalitarian government. If the Chinese government interferes with your business, you lose money. It doesn't make sense to ignore the large and rapidly growing Chinese market but you can reduce risk and improve productivity by concentrating on other parts of Asia and transporting products to China by truck, train, or ship.
India suffers from dreadful infrastructure. Roads, electricity grids, ports and plumbing are at least 30 years behind China. So, while the labor costs of producing computers in the Sub-Continent might be on par with the PRC, Apple would either have to lay down serious upfront cash to build a decent facility with reliable supply lines or put up with subpar operating conditions with even more instability than it currently experiences in Taiwan.
Thailand isn't really set up to manufacture hi-tech equipment. They are a center for textiles and clothing manufacturing but essentially it is a small environmentally sensitive country whose potential (and actual) eco-tourism value is much higher than it would be to strip its rainforests only to play industry catch-up with already established neighbors. Taiwan is, afterall, fairly buffered from the political instabilities of the mainland.
You may have a point with the Philipines. Although, I believe it shares many of the same traits and concerns that I described for India and Thailand.
On a slight tangent... the Apple site being down in China is really no big deal at all. Most people don't speak English there (Trust me, I know from experience dude) and couldn't give two hoots if the English website isn't up. As long as apple.com.cn is still running the only people affected are obsessive weiguoren who should probably be focusing on making the most of their cultural experiences rather than surfing apple's website. Apple's major problem in the region is its relative expense. In a country where even U.S. beige boxes can't compete with the beige-er than beige Chinese knock-offs, an apple computer selling at $1000 or more is a ludicrous expense affordable to very few.
I do somewhat agree with your point about corporate responsibility though. You weren't really arguing this but I strongly believe U.S. companies have an obligation to export not only their products but also the ideals that allowed them to exist in the first place. And I'm not just talking about cut-through meritocracy.