No, it just means it'll drop little seedlings on the ground as it flies by!So does this mean no more cargo jets flying the latest iPhones over from China when they are released?
No, it just means it'll drop little seedlings on the ground as it flies by!So does this mean no more cargo jets flying the latest iPhones over from China when they are released?
Not everything needs to be a competition?It'd be nice if Apple was choosing to lead instead of follow.
Microsoft already committed to being carbon negative by 2030 and to have completely undone all of their lifetime carbon emissions by 2050.
That’s an Australia thing, not an Apple thing.Wish they could commit to getting the ECG feature working on my Apple Watch in Australia.
First of all, I have no idea how either of those are related. But secondly, the environment is much more important than your petty complaints about useless minor annoyances.It is certainly a good goal Apple, but it would also be nice if you committed to fixing your poor software quality control by 2030 as well. Somehow though, I’m pretty sure that is not a priority under Apple’s current leadership.
Yes that should help climate change lolBetter yet Apple could release a wireless charging mat by 2030
Actually yeah, and you even got some downvotes. There’s a lot of free hate towards Apple because it’s expensive, elitist, etc... or because they use Foxconn, they pay workers $5 an hour and people have killed themselves due to working stress.Really cool!
Hopes it also count for nuclear energy
Apple is making a lot of effort (more than other company by far, even if it's not perfect) and I'm happy to be one of their customer
Yeah but we hate Microsoft here. Didn't you get the memo?It'd be nice if Apple was choosing to lead instead of follow.
Microsoft already committed to being carbon negative by 2030 and to have completely undone all of their lifetime carbon emissions by 2050.
First of all, I have no idea how either of those are related. But secondly, the environment is much more important than your petty complaints about useless minor annoyances.
What about the hundreds of thousands of Apple employees exhaling earth destroying CO2 every second of every day?
Apple is not a tech company.I agree environment is more important, but honestly the tech company is supposed to be a tech company first priority. Leave carbon goals to governments. Trust me. California will mandate that and more for them. They should focus on their mission and less on quasi-statehood.
Whats your point? That’s clearly stated in the article and Apple’s announcement.
Majority of people who buy Apple products have no idea about any of their environmental advancements. They buy the phones, or the computers, because they look cool, or because they were recommended to them.The point is that it's just another gimmick to get you to keep paying MORE for Apple products.
So you can feel good about yourself no matter how much of a sh$thead you are.![]()
Apple is not a tech company.
They are a company, who happens to make technology. However, they could discontinue all of their computers, and phones, and any other product they make, and start selling toilet paper if they wanted to.So i’m happy that they’re making technology, and caring about the environment. It’s just a win-win situation. As for governments, have you seen the US government? They couldn’t give a rats patootie about the environment