Good joke but Iowa isn't known for our potatos...try corn smart guy.No! They will run this with environmentally friendly potato power.
Good joke but Iowa isn't known for our potatos...try corn smart guy.No! They will run this with environmentally friendly potato power.
Good lord, they employ two million people in the US alone?! Why on earth do we not have a new Mac Pro??
Or maybe the lack of natural disasters, abundance of clean and cheap energy, abundance of land, and sweet tax deals.
Oh, and we're nice.
It should be noted that it's not an odd choice (Iowa). Microsoft already operates 2 datacenters there (one US Government specific) and another public cloud, Google has a datacenter there and Facebook is in the process of building one.
Tim Cook plans on running for President down the road.
No! They will run this with environmentally friendly potato power.
NOT Rocket Science, Apple picked Iowa simply because Tim Cook plans on running for President down the road.
I predict Mark Zuckerberg vs Tim Cook in 2020 for the Democratic nomination
|Wait, is it 'center' or 'centre'?
NOT Rocket Science, Apple picked Iowa simply because Tim Cook plans on running for President down the road.
Iowa? Someone must have paid Apple off. Clouds, floods, tornadoes, freezing temps. All the things that are bad for data centers. Facebook's project in Albuquerque was probably the smartest data center move to date. Cheap land, cheap labor, few clouds, no twisters, and def no flooding.
Apple is investing $1.3 billion into the facility, which it says will create over 550 construction and operations jobs in the Des Moines area.
Apple also said it will contribute up to $100 million to a newly created Public Improvement Fund dedicated to community development and infrastructure around Waukee.
Iowa's Economic Development Authority reportedly approved a deal on Thursday that will give Apple $208 million in state and local tax breaks
But Apple is paying their fair share of taxes.
Good lord, they employ two million people in the US alone?! Why on earth do we not have a new Mac Pro??
No! They will run this with environmentally friendly potato power.
LMAO. " My Campaign will be Magical."![]()
They don't employ anywhere even remotely near that amount of people. They're claiming responsibility for two million jobs, as in non-Apple jobs in manufacturing, infrastructure, etc. resulting from their corporate activity. For example, they need glass for their phones, and the glass company has to hire x amount of people to supply Apple's demand. The chain goes all the way down to raw materials.Good lord, they employ two million people in the US alone?! Why on earth do we not have a new Mac Pro??
Or maybe the lack of natural disasters, abundance of clean and cheap energy, abundance of land, and sweet tax deals.
Oh, and we're nice.
Facebook already has a data center in Iowa![]()
Ah yes. The new F22 Raptor with less on board ammo, thinner, less fuel, no headphone jacks, and all soldered together in one giant piece.NOT Rocket Science, Apple picked Iowa simply because Tim Cook plans on running for President down the road.
This is Iowa so it would be corn power![]()
Maybe apple should just pay their fair share of taxes and quit asking for massive incentives (Cupertino) instead of saying they plan to GIVE millions away.
It reminds me of the similar "the rich need to pay their fair share!" adage. I assume that those that chant it don't realize that 50% of the taxes in this country are paid for by the top 1% earners. I want to say, "Take a look around... See all this infrastructure? Those roads? The mail lady that delivered your mail today? Yeah, the top 1% earners paid for half of it. A mere one percent of earners paid for half of all of it. Maybe the top 1% aren't so evil after all."Oh lord. That canard again. Apple's "fair share" of taxes is what the law says it is. Maybe that's too low in your mind. Maybe you don't look kindly on the existing loopholes. But that is the law. So please let's not falsely imply that Apple is a tax cheat.
And whatever Apple itself pays in real estate and income taxes it also generates billions in tax revenue because of the # of people it employees directly and also indirectly though suppliers, transport, and other vendors. And all those employed people mean they are not on public assistance further burdening local and state coffers.
Maybe apple should just pay their fair share of taxes and quit asking for massive incentives (Cupertino) instead of saying they plan to GIVE millions away.
Or maybe the lack of natural disasters, abundance of clean and cheap energy, abundance of land, and sweet tax deals.
Oh, and we're nice.
They pay all the taxes they are legally obligated to pay. . . Just like you do.
We have tornadoes. I bet they'd do a number on a solar panel farm.
Good joke but Iowa isn't known for our potatos...try corn smart guy.