Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

iphone X

macrumors regular
May 30, 2011
119
10
I'm just hoping that the "iwatch" looks more like and "iband" than a watch if not then I'm not interested :confused:
 

lk400

macrumors 65816
Aug 26, 2012
1,050
630
apple doing this whole health thing seriously makes sense as a Jobs legacy. I read an article about all the time he spent in hospital complaining about the junky health equipment etc in his room. This would make sense as the next field he would have wanted to crack, given what he went through at the end there.
 

lk400

macrumors 65816
Aug 26, 2012
1,050
630
Putting the weather related sensors on a watch would avoid some of the issues with measuring your pocket. Crowd sourced real time weather seems tempting.
 

Rad99004

macrumors 6502
Nov 12, 2009
286
4
Things to think about.

Your iWatch health app will capture data that that the insurance companies will be willing to pay a lot for.

Will be interested in the terms of service for this product.
 

ohbrilliance

macrumors 65816
May 15, 2007
1,010
355
Melbourne, Australia
An interesting comment on The Loop: "It will be easier for Apple when it comes to light that “iWatch” isn’t a product but an OS/platform."

Coming from Jim Dalrymple, that seems to confirm the premise of this article.
 

Urban Joe

Suspended
Mar 19, 2012
506
534
What more evidence or logic do you need? If heath insurance companies can still raise rates based on information about your health then, by definition, it is not socialized medicine.

Technically speaking you might be correct. But only technically and clearly the essence of my argument escaped your reason.
 

Urban Joe

Suspended
Mar 19, 2012
506
534
And neither does yours. Paranoia is not an argument. It is not evidence, nor does it rely on logic.

Hahaha, there is plenty of evidence to support my position. The fact that such a proposition would be dismissed as "paranoia" discredits either your moral integrity, intellect or knowledge.

Data collection is fine but there should be an opt-out button and stiff legal penalties for ANY company covertly collecting and misusing data. This way people have rightful control over it. Strict boundaries should be placed around this now.

As the "internet of things" ie. "the internet of "bugs" " expands these types of issues will hopefully come more to the forefront and be addressed properly and "with the due consent of the governed." Any data collection device falls into this category...smartphones, smartwatches, smart-car devices, smart TVs etc.
 

IJ Reilly

macrumors P6
Jul 16, 2002
17,909
1,496
Palookaville
Hahaha, there is plenty of evidence to support my position. The fact that such a proposition would be dismissed as "paranoia" discredits either your moral integrity, intellect or knowledge.

Data collection is fine but there should be an opt-out button and stiff legal penalties for ANY company covertly collecting and misusing data. This way people have rightful control over it. Strict boundaries should be placed around this now.

As the "internet of things" ie. "the internet of "bugs" " expands these types of issues will hopefully come more to the forefront and be addressed properly and "with the due consent of the governed." Any data collection device falls into this category...smartphones, smartwatches, smart-car devices, smart TVs etc.

As always, paranoia is its own reward, and survives on reasoning that doesn't require evidence of anything actually occurring, just the theory that something might, possibly, someday, happen, and leaps of logic between unrelated things. This is nothing new to me. In fact it is par for that particular course.

And watch the insults. They don't do anything positive for your argument.
 

Urban Joe

Suspended
Mar 19, 2012
506
534
Food for thought

There are a lot of issues surrounding this type of technology and since the industry seems to be focusing on the "internet of things" there are legitimate questions people should be asking, such as:

Do third parties have a right to this data? Should this personal data be protected or over time should all personal data be publicly available to concerned parties? Does your employer have a right to require you to wear a medical data device in order to receive medical health insurance? Should insurance companies (health and auto) have the right to force consumers to install data collection devices in order to provide highly detailed policy holder data to figure into premium calculations?

Data is very easily generated and very efficiently collected...and we know there are already systems in place to store this data for as long as necessary. Parsing this data will only become much easier as super/quantum-computers become more widely used. Better to address these issues now in order to avoid further infringement upon personal liberty.

http://www.technologyreview.com/news/429429/the-cia-and-jeff-bezos-bet-on-quantum-computing/
 

zipa

macrumors 65816
Feb 19, 2010
1,442
1
Samsung health app ecosystem launching in 2013...

There, fixed that for you.

----------

Because it's spring and its never too soon to get into a habit of getting away from your desk (or couch) and onto the street or gym. The existing fitness bands can be bought today. Apple's does not. What you are suggesting is akin to saying don't date a fun-ish, average looking woman today because an amazing "entire package" beautiful woman might give you a wink in 6-12+ months.

One certainly does not need a fitness band of any sort to start exercising or going to the gym. Using the lack of one as an excuse is nothing but that.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.