Seems to be the Apple Way these days unfortunately. Half baked maybes that never fully materialize, lackluster innovation and lots of iteration.why did they announce this years ago and its no where near ready
Seems to be the Apple Way these days unfortunately. Half baked maybes that never fully materialize, lackluster innovation and lots of iteration.why did they announce this years ago and its no where near ready
Porsche also switched to Android Automotive with the new Macan EV. Most people don‘t notice it, but it is true. Also route planning/charging stations is most of the time better, since CarPlay doesn‘t have all the data the car and the manufacturer has.I have a Porsche Taycan (2022) and the CarPlay integration and things you can 'control' on the car from the CarPlay interface seem to be a bit of a preview here to what is coming (like controlling fans and so forth). The EV routing integration with Apple Maps is also really good (ie it plans charging stops and routing)
We just picked up a Macan EV and its CarPlay is even better, with map integration on the central display, and routing information also displayed in central display and heads up.
Anyway, looking forward to the interface, car makers are pretty terrible at UI and I find myself sitting in the CarPlay only interfaces most of the time.
I also appreciate porsche has kept things like dedicated interfaces for volume, climate controls vs. burying them in menus.
What about regular CarPlay thats in current cars, what is new there?
I would love for this to allow the car to use the iPhone's data plan for all data needs. Most car companies are including a limited time of free data, but then charge for a separate car plan. Why can't I just use my phone's data plan that I already pay for?
Have you looked at Tesla? It’s everyone, not just Apple. It took 10 years for the Cybertruck to come out and the new (fastest car in the world) Roadster is still a fantasy 10 years later.Seems to be the Apple Way these days unfortunately. Half baked maybes that never fully materialize, lackluster innovation and lots of iteration.
See also: Apple Intelligencewhy did they announce this years ago and its no where near ready
Unfortunately, it is not well done in TVs like Sony Google/Android, so there is no reason to believe that any car integration is going to be any better.Since Apple scrapped its in-house car plans, going the Google Android Automotive route seems like the next logical evolution. I don't mind the whole car system takeover of either platform so long as it's well done/well thoughtout but I've not driven a Android Automotive equipped car before to give me thoughts one way or the other but what I have read from others is mixed and it does depend on the car OEM also since in the case of Android Automotive, Google supplies the base architecture and features but the rest is up to the OEM to tailor it around their own UI and branding design language or certain brand or model specific features.
Classic MacRumors comment, Apple is DOOMED! 😂Seems to be the Apple Way these days unfortunately. Half baked maybes that never fully materialize, lackluster innovation and lots of iteration.
Porsche also switched to Android Automotive with the new Macan EV. Most people don‘t notice it, but it is true. Also route planning/charging stations is most of the time better, since CarPlay doesn‘t have all the data the car and the manufacturer has.
I haven't had this issue with my cars.Why don’t people reveal how iPhone 16pm is disconnecting and reconnecting intermittently over Bluetooth with CarPlay ? It is an ongoing huge issue
The biggest thing I miss in today's CarPlay is XMRadio integration. With XM playing, messages do not come through CarPlay.
Thank God Mazda isn’t on the list - yet anyway. I don’t want CarPlay reaching that deeply into the operation of my vehicle. I simply want phone mirroring on a single screen.
I wish they would do more, but I don’t think there is much more they can. So much is reliant on the manufacture to actually implement features, such as HUD directions or instrument cluster integration.Right?
How about we work on software actually in use and not just the theoretical "take over the whole car" that we're not even sure anyone (or any car makers) really wants
We could easily have both if they wanted to give it to us. A CarPlay interface that shows the climate controls/radio/etc, and physical buttons and knobs that control it.Buttons are safer (and a mountain of research exists today so), I hope it doesn’t all go to screens. I’m not a fan of apples design language here either. It’s too reductive and not rich or descriptive enough. I want the car to have hallmarks of the manufacturer not look like a giant iPhone
Yeah, feeling elite is pretty important. To some…Unfortunately Porsche is on the list.
Sometimes less is more and apparently Porsche has forgotten that with the looks of that rendering.
Imagine a $150,000+ sports car having the same arcade inspired dash/cabin as a $30,000 VW.
you mean to tell me you're not on the list for a Porsche GT3RS 😂this is taking too long. I was hoping it would be in affordable cars by the time I need a new one
That’s a very common issue for almost every manufacturer of any device across the planet. It’s called protecting intellectual rights. To suggest it is an "Apple" problem is very naive.Since this whole concept requires massive partnerships with car makers, I'm pretty sure you won't be able to escape a subscription of some kind with the car maker
I'm skeptical this is even going to go anywhere.
Apple is notoriously awful to work with in terms of partnerships
They always want everything heavily skewed in their favor
It's one of the reasons they continue to be a "zero" in gaming