Sorry, what on earth are you talking aboot?Canadian accents are distinguishable from American ones, eh?
Sorry, what on earth are you talking aboot?Canadian accents are distinguishable from American ones, eh?
Sounds like some idiot contractor who made it sound way worse than it actually was just got 300 people laid off...
I personally don't understand how you would expect the process to improve if it wasn't randomly sampled and corrected. Sounds like exactly what I would have expected to be going on, with zero concern.
You know what. Everyone I know, knows that Google is making money with advertising. There’s no secret to it. But Apple also makes money with advertising, be it somewhat indirectly. And then this. If listening to Siri wasn’t such a big deal, then why was the project canceled by Apple?Not really. Apple’s product is gadgets and supporting services. That’s how they earn money. Google’s product is advertising. That’s how they earn money.
It's not secret, that Siri and other clicks are used in the App store and I believe you can opt-out of them. But that's entirely different from googles' model of targeted advertisements.You know what. Everyone I know, knows that Google is making money with advertising. There’s no secret to it. But Apple also makes money with advertising, be it somewhat indirectly.
IMO, this isn't going away. Apple is going to do this in a different way. The contractor blew the NDA and probably was responsible for the firing of the entire department. It's a tell that the AI can't get better for all concerned without some human intervention.And then this. If listening to Siri wasn’t such a big deal, then why was the project canceled by Apple?
Yes and no. Baby steps. Security and privacy is a process not an end goal.And when Apple really cared about our privacy, then we would have an opt-in checkbox, but since that’s not the case...people are upset about it.
It could have been clearer, but that's where Apple put it. I was never worried about my conversations leaking to the dark web. Some people care, some people don't. With 1 billion customers, there are many opinions.Another thing. Using a TOS as fine print for users is not a great thing. It’s used as a legal defense, but it could have been so much better. I mean. Let’s take car mirrors, as example, and what I read it them, is the missing fine print from Apple. That is the issue people are having with this. The missing reminder...with the option to opt-in or opt-out.
It depends if one took it as a statement of fact or a slogan. As a statement of fact, it's flat out false and one would have to be pedantic to view it as such. It's a slogan. And obviously there is communication between the iphone and apples infrastructure and the outside world.Lastly. That big advertisement about what happens on your iPhone, is a lie. That is another thing that people are upset about.
Agreed, who knows what will happen in five years. Apple has clearly made some mis-steps, but a mis-step does not mean they aren't working to ensure their customers data is safe.And in five years from now, who knows what may happen. Perhaps more sh*t may hit the fan, and that’s when a lot of people will say; oh, just like that Siri thing.
I personally do not care about it, but other people seem to have real issues with it.
Not the point. Follow the trail of Apple money and it leads to gadgets and services. Follow the trail of Google money and it leads to you.You know what. Everyone I know, knows that Google is making money with advertising. There’s no secret to it. But Apple also makes money with advertising, be it somewhat indirectly.
Just because there’s uproar doesn’t mean people are right. It’s easier for Apple to do damage control by stopping the process than it is to try to teach the outraged that you can’t do QI on a voice recognition system without humans listening. (I also wouldn’t want anyone developing an automated driving system without a human assessing it from behind the wheel.) You can’t reason with the mob, so just put out the fire.If listening to Siri wasn’t such a big deal, then why was the project canceled by Apple?
I just assumed that this practice was part of the "send analytics to Apple" checkbox when you activate any new Apple device. It wasn't like the contractors were continuously monitoring people's audio; they were simply checking Siri's response when a query was made in order to improve Siri's accuracy. No one was able to connect someone's name with the query. I can see why this makes good fodder for the media, but IMO it's being overblown.
Seems google did this exact same thing as well and it was pretty quiet about that.But if it was Google there would be outrage.
It does make you wonder how you view what's said on stage to the general public.
We have Tim Cook speaking again and again on the total privacy topic. Whilst at the very same time he's saying these words to the public, he knows full well, this stuff is going on, and keeping quiet about it.
Knowing this, you can't help but wonder about other things being done, which we may never know about, whilst being told something else.
I don't care, just be open and honest about it Apple.
Apple got caught with their pants down and should never have contracted out something so sensitive. Apple is 100% to blame and should have been upfront.Sounds like some idiot contractor who made it sound way worse than it actually was just got 300 people laid off...
Apple claims publicly that your data stays on your phone, when in fact they’re sending it to third-party people who were having a listen. This is ******** and someone probably should’ve gotten fired.
Sounds like some idiot contractor who made it sound way worse than it actually was just got 300 people laid off...
I personally don't understand how you would expect the process to improve if it wasn't randomly sampled and corrected. Sounds like exactly what I would have expected to be going on, with zero concern.
Contractors are the same as employees, except there is no process to fire a contractor.Apple got caught with their pants down and should never have contracted out something so sensitive. Apple is 100% to blame and should have been upfront.
Are you in a habit of saying "Hey Siri" when having sex?
.
Seriously, i dont how one would expect this to improve without human intervention. They will have to listen.
On a side note: There have been many instances, many, where i have spoken something and Siri (the machine) interpreted it perfectly word-to-word, then all of a sudden, she wipes everything, re-writes something that is not remotely correct to what i spoke! Somehow.
All my Apple gadgets and services ultimately leads to me and my family. It’s even easier for Apple. They know who we are. Everything is linked to our iCloud id’s.Not the point. Follow the trail of Apple money and it leads to gadgets and services. Follow the trail of Google money and it leads to you.
Just because there’s uproar doesn’t mean people are right. It’s easier for Apple to do damage control by stopping the process than it is to try to teach the outraged that you can’t do QI on a voice recognition system without humans listening. (I also wouldn’t want anyone developing an automated driving system without a human assessing it from behind the wheel.) You can’t reason with the mob, so just put out the fire.
This is the worst excuse. Blame Apple for the ignorance of the average consumer....Again there is no way the average iPhone user understands this and they shouldn't have to....
Contractors are the same as employees, except there is no process to fire a contractor.
This is the worst excuse. Blame Apple for the ignorance of the average consumer.
They do the same job as employees, background checks and ndas. So yeah, they are the same as employees.Contractors also don’t get paid benefits and have limited access to company resources.
So no, they aren’t the same as staff employees. They are literally a hired gun for a single job.
And that is why right “under enable” Siri there is a link about privacy. Being consumer friendly and having a comprehensive tos are not mutually exclusive. And ones definition of “consumer friendly” is a sliding scale.Apple prides themselves on consumer friendliness. What you’re saying here is the opposite of their mantra.
FFS - I am not going to read every misinformed comment on this thread. Yes, I am on iOS 13 beta, but this has been in Siri settings for as long as I can remember.
View attachment 854740 View attachment 854741
This is the worst excuse. Blame Apple for the ignorance of the average consumer.
Your calling people misinformed but your post doesn't make any sense at all.
Most people would have no idea this was happening so why would they take steps to mitigate something that was happening without their knowledge?
How do you know “most” people would have no idea this is happening? Isn’t they presumptuous.Your calling people misinformed but your post doesn't make any sense at all.
Most people would have no idea this was happening so why would they take steps to mitigate something that was happening without their knowledge?
Is there anything you wouldn’t criticize them on?Is there anything you wouldn't defend them on?![]()