Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Controversy aside, if the intent of those contractors was to improve the quality of Siri, they failed miserably, which is reason enough alone to can the whole team and stop the program, IMO.

Go back to the drawing board, Apple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tsepz
Sounds like some idiot contractor who made it sound way worse than it actually was just got 300 people laid off...

I personally don't understand how you would expect the process to improve if it wasn't randomly sampled and corrected. Sounds like exactly what I would have expected to be going on, with zero concern.

Apple claims publicly that your data stays on your phone, when in fact they’re sending it to third-party people who were having a listen. This is ******** and someone probably should’ve gotten fired.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PC_tech
It does make you wonder how you view what's said on stage to the general public.
We have Tim Cook speaking again and again on the total privacy topic. Whilst at the very same time he's saying these words to the public, he knows full well, this stuff is going on, and keeping quiet about it.

Knowing this, you can't help but wonder about other things being done, which we may never know about, whilst being told something else.

I don't care, just be open and honest about it Apple.
 
Not really. Apple’s product is gadgets and supporting services. That’s how they earn money. Google’s product is advertising. That’s how they earn money.
You know what. Everyone I know, knows that Google is making money with advertising. There’s no secret to it. But Apple also makes money with advertising, be it somewhat indirectly. And then this. If listening to Siri wasn’t such a big deal, then why was the project canceled by Apple?

And when Apple really cared about our privacy, then we would have an opt-in checkbox, but since that’s not the case...people are upset about it.

Another thing. Using a TOS as fine print for users is not a great thing. It’s used as a legal defense, but it could have been so much better. I mean. Let’s take car mirrors, as example, and what I read it them, is the missing fine print from Apple. That is the issue people are having with this. The missing reminder...with the option to opt-in or opt-out.

Lastly. That big advertisement about what happens on your iPhone, is a lie. That is another thing that people are upset about.

And in five years from now, who knows what may happen. Perhaps more sh*t may hit the fan, and that’s when a lot of people will say; oh, just like that Siri thing.

I personally do not care about it, but other people seem to have real issues with it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Rob_2811
You know what. Everyone I know, knows that Google is making money with advertising. There’s no secret to it. But Apple also makes money with advertising, be it somewhat indirectly.
It's not secret, that Siri and other clicks are used in the App store and I believe you can opt-out of them. But that's entirely different from googles' model of targeted advertisements.

And then this. If listening to Siri wasn’t such a big deal, then why was the project canceled by Apple?
IMO, this isn't going away. Apple is going to do this in a different way. The contractor blew the NDA and probably was responsible for the firing of the entire department. It's a tell that the AI can't get better for all concerned without some human intervention.

And when Apple really cared about our privacy, then we would have an opt-in checkbox, but since that’s not the case...people are upset about it.
Yes and no. Baby steps. Security and privacy is a process not an end goal.

Another thing. Using a TOS as fine print for users is not a great thing. It’s used as a legal defense, but it could have been so much better. I mean. Let’s take car mirrors, as example, and what I read it them, is the missing fine print from Apple. That is the issue people are having with this. The missing reminder...with the option to opt-in or opt-out.
It could have been clearer, but that's where Apple put it. I was never worried about my conversations leaking to the dark web. Some people care, some people don't. With 1 billion customers, there are many opinions.

Lastly. That big advertisement about what happens on your iPhone, is a lie. That is another thing that people are upset about.
It depends if one took it as a statement of fact or a slogan. As a statement of fact, it's flat out false and one would have to be pedantic to view it as such. It's a slogan. And obviously there is communication between the iphone and apples infrastructure and the outside world.

And in five years from now, who knows what may happen. Perhaps more sh*t may hit the fan, and that’s when a lot of people will say; oh, just like that Siri thing.

I personally do not care about it, but other people seem to have real issues with it.
Agreed, who knows what will happen in five years. Apple has clearly made some mis-steps, but a mis-step does not mean they aren't working to ensure their customers data is safe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FamVR and Kabeyun
You know what. Everyone I know, knows that Google is making money with advertising. There’s no secret to it. But Apple also makes money with advertising, be it somewhat indirectly.
Not the point. Follow the trail of Apple money and it leads to gadgets and services. Follow the trail of Google money and it leads to you.

If listening to Siri wasn’t such a big deal, then why was the project canceled by Apple?
Just because there’s uproar doesn’t mean people are right. It’s easier for Apple to do damage control by stopping the process than it is to try to teach the outraged that you can’t do QI on a voice recognition system without humans listening. (I also wouldn’t want anyone developing an automated driving system without a human assessing it from behind the wheel.) You can’t reason with the mob, so just put out the fire.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chabig and I7guy
I just assumed that this practice was part of the "send analytics to Apple" checkbox when you activate any new Apple device. It wasn't like the contractors were continuously monitoring people's audio; they were simply checking Siri's response when a query was made in order to improve Siri's accuracy. No one was able to connect someone's name with the query. I can see why this makes good fodder for the media, but IMO it's being overblown.

But if it was Google there would be outrage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jamezr
It does make you wonder how you view what's said on stage to the general public.
We have Tim Cook speaking again and again on the total privacy topic. Whilst at the very same time he's saying these words to the public, he knows full well, this stuff is going on, and keeping quiet about it.

Knowing this, you can't help but wonder about other things being done, which we may never know about, whilst being told something else.

I don't care, just be open and honest about it Apple.

If you've worked at a company and had any sort of cynicism, you'd know to not view what's said on stage as complete truth. Companies go to lengths to present politically correct views.
 
Sounds like some idiot contractor who made it sound way worse than it actually was just got 300 people laid off...
Apple got caught with their pants down and should never have contracted out something so sensitive. Apple is 100% to blame and should have been upfront.
 
Apple claims publicly that your data stays on your phone, when in fact they’re sending it to third-party people who were having a listen. This is ******** and someone probably should’ve gotten fired.

See how this all works.. Apple could have done this without public knowing, and no one would know.. Only when something comes out, it's too late..

Which is why that system always works, even if it is a privacy violation 'per say.'

We're just moving the posts to someone else to trust. But convenience always takes control. Using the "We need to do this to improve service" can be said for just about anything regardless..

If people are that worried, why use it?
 
Sounds like some idiot contractor who made it sound way worse than it actually was just got 300 people laid off...

I personally don't understand how you would expect the process to improve if it wasn't randomly sampled and corrected. Sounds like exactly what I would have expected to be going on, with zero concern.

Seriously, i dont how one would expect this to improve without human intervention. They will have to listen.

On a side note: There have been many instances, many, where i have spoken something and Siri (the machine) interpreted it perfectly word-to-word, then all of a sudden, she wipes everything, re-writes something that is not remotely correct to what i spoke! Somehow.
 
Are you in a habit of saying "Hey Siri" when having sex?
.

This is a terrible argument. The issue here is accidental triggers which result in contractors listening to private conversations/interactions that are happening in peoples homes.

It happens with the Echo, Google Home and the HomePod.

Seriously, i dont how one would expect this to improve without human intervention. They will have to listen.

On a side note: There have been many instances, many, where i have spoken something and Siri (the machine) interpreted it perfectly word-to-word, then all of a sudden, she wipes everything, re-writes something that is not remotely correct to what i spoke! Somehow.


Again there is no way the average iPhone user understands this and they shouldn't have to.

The answer is that Apple should be absolutely clear about what happens with voice recordings, its very easy to do put a message in plain language in the software, in the Siri settings page and on set up of a new device, advising the end user that Apple and its contractors may listen to some of their recording to improve the software and have a simple opt out toggle. Problem solved.

Vague language buried in some licence agreement somewhere isn't enough if you are going to preach to the world about how much you care about your customers privacy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tfredvik
Not the point. Follow the trail of Apple money and it leads to gadgets and services. Follow the trail of Google money and it leads to you.


Just because there’s uproar doesn’t mean people are right. It’s easier for Apple to do damage control by stopping the process than it is to try to teach the outraged that you can’t do QI on a voice recognition system without humans listening. (I also wouldn’t want anyone developing an automated driving system without a human assessing it from behind the wheel.) You can’t reason with the mob, so just put out the fire.
All my Apple gadgets and services ultimately leads to me and my family. It’s even easier for Apple. They know who we are. Everything is linked to our iCloud id’s.

The fact that Google makes money with advertisements is their way of paying the bills. I don’t have a problem with that, or I should stop using Google. As a matter of fact, the money paid out by Google, helped developers a decade ago, who now work for Apple, to work on things like Safari. And I know, because I was one of them.
 
Contractors are the same as employees, except there is no process to fire a contractor.

Contractors also don’t get paid benefits and have limited access to company resources.

So no, they aren’t the same as staff employees. They are literally a hired gun for a single job.
[doublepost=1566821894][/doublepost]
This is the worst excuse. Blame Apple for the ignorance of the average consumer.

Apple prides themselves on consumer friendliness. What you’re saying here is the opposite of their mantra.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rob_2811 and jamezr
Contractors also don’t get paid benefits and have limited access to company resources.

So no, they aren’t the same as staff employees. They are literally a hired gun for a single job.
They do the same job as employees, background checks and ndas. So yeah, they are the same as employees.

Apple prides themselves on consumer friendliness. What you’re saying here is the opposite of their mantra.
And that is why right “under enable” Siri there is a link about privacy. Being consumer friendly and having a comprehensive tos are not mutually exclusive. And ones definition of “consumer friendly” is a sliding scale.
 
This situation is not defensible. Apple must issue and apology and fix this immediately. Nothing should be blamed on the consumer here.

The fact that they even have Recordings of people in intimate moments is truly shocking.

How can anyone defend Apple in this situation!? It’s disgusting!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rob_2811
FFS - I am not going to read every misinformed comment on this thread. Yes, I am on iOS 13 beta, but this has been in Siri settings for as long as I can remember.

900D8286-BD96-4777-B1A3-51A85EB1A2EE.jpeg 48D2F14E-5766-4E66-8489-3F5878DF2C94.jpeg
E0B51616-2897-46F8-80A2-2854B1CF1EF3.jpeg
 
Last edited:
FFS - I am not going to read every misinformed comment on this thread. Yes, I am on iOS 13 beta, but this has been in Siri settings for as long as I can remember.

View attachment 854740 View attachment 854741

Your calling people misinformed but your post doesn't make any sense at all.

Most people would have no idea this was happening so why would they take steps to mitigate something that was happening without their knowledge?

This is the worst excuse. Blame Apple for the ignorance of the average consumer.

Is there anything you wouldn't defend them on? :D
 
Your calling people misinformed but your post doesn't make any sense at all.

Most people would have no idea this was happening so why would they take steps to mitigate something that was happening without their knowledge?

I apologize that you lack basic reading comprehension skills. I added another screen shot to clearly show that this is part of the privacy statement for Siri that is readily available for ANY USER to read. That they refuse and/or fail to do so is squarely on them - Apple disclosed their policy fairly clearly.

tl;dr - RTFM!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kabeyun
Your calling people misinformed but your post doesn't make any sense at all.

Most people would have no idea this was happening so why would they take steps to mitigate something that was happening without their knowledge?
How do you know “most” people would have no idea this is happening? Isn’t they presumptuous.

Is there anything you wouldn't defend them on? :D
Is there anything you wouldn’t criticize them on?:p
 
I don't use machine learning much in my job, but I'm pretty sure to get the model used for speech-to-text better, you need a large set of properly tagged training data which I'm guessing is what these contractors were doing. If you want Siri to work well, you're gonna have to give it real-world recordings.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.