Why the heck does it need to be exclusive?
What's wrong with some of the posters here?
U2 released the song Vertigo exclusively on iTunes prior to the announcement of the U2 iPod. They also let Apple sell an exclusive digital box set in conjunction with the release of the U2 iPod.
**** the beatles
they were in the right place at the right time
over rated and over hyped.
hallelujah!
Good.Because I do love Paul, Ringo, John and George except they and their familes really don't need to be any richer.
He owns the rights to some of the printed (sheet) music catalog, not the recordings that become the albums. And he really doesn't own them at the moment, as I think they are now in the hands of his creditors while he pays off his debts.
Exactly. Funny, I have many Beatles albums, but for some reason I have not ripped then to iTunes, but I have almost all my other CDs.
...no Beatles-edition iPod? We'll see...
As opposed to a 12-16 year old mentality towards insignificant pop ballads adored just because the singers are cute.... I sense a 12-16 year old wintel mentality towards things...
First, I thought Michael Jackson or Sony or someone else owned the rights to the Beatles catalog...
I think that's a load of crap....The Beatles are a wonderful band, I mean, what other band has come close to 166 million albums.
I've grown to like the Beatles, but I'd take that Police iPod in a snap!Bahhhhhh.
Forget a Beatles iPod.
I would rather have a special edition iPod of The Police!![]()
![]()
![]()
Bahhhhhh.
Forget a Beatles iPod.
I would rather have a special edition iPod of The Police!
**** the beatles
they were in the right place at the right time
over rated and over hyped.
why are they even in the news here? why not write about every artist that is or isnt on itunes?