Yes, but that's like comparing the first automobile franchise near the turn of the 20th with a marquee brand dealership today. Jobs negotionations with the music companies was done at a time when the industry was bleeding from illegal downloads. The music industrial literally had nothing to lose and it was also limited to Mac users which was a tiny user base compared to the PC user base.
Now what happened was that iTunes revived the music industry and with that iTunes was able to start calling shots -- like keeping prices at .99/song when the industry wanted to go higher. Eventualy Apple traded removing DRM with increasing song prices to $1.29
With video Apple isn't reall innovating its just searching for a me-too bundle. It doesn't have the leverage that it did when Jobs negotiated the iTunes store. Content is king now because distributors are a dime a dozen, a nickle on Tuesday. Apple hasn't made progress because Apple thinks it still has leverage and no one likes a bully. Other companies have had no problem negotiating streaming bundles either for live TV or movies and back catalog TV. It's just Apple that can't come to deal.
To add to this, a middle man like Apple is no longer required. HBO, Showtime, CBS, WWE, UFC, MLB, NHL, etc., all have their own streaming apps/services that carry their content directly to the end customer.
The landscape is totally different than 15yrs ago and the movie/tv industry has a totally different business model than the music industry.
Hmm, I do agree with you guys actually. Motion picture industry was definitely better at safeguarding their content and probably learned a bit from the music industries' pains.
It'll be interesting to see what they do. I don't know if they can indefinitely keep iTunes the way it is though.