Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Apple Upgrades Siri with ChatGPT, Admits Defeat Gracefully (Sort Of)

CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA — June 30, 2025
— In a move absolutely no one saw coming (except literally everyone), Apple today announced that Siri is now integrating ChatGPT. Yes, that ChatGPT — the one you’ve been quietly relying on for years while pretending Siri was still "learning."

After over a decade of valiantly misunderstanding your calendar invites, offering weather for countries you’ve never visited, and responding to “Remind me to take out the trash” with “Calling Trash,” Siri is finally getting the upgrade she desperately needs. And instead of pretending we invented it, we’re just borrowing someone else’s smarter kid and pretending it was our idea all along. Classic Apple.


What does this mean for you, the loyal user?
– Siri now responds like she’s read more than six articles from 2014.
– She won’t freeze when you say “Wait, no, I meant…”
– She can write poems, code, love letters, grocery lists, and fake doctor’s notes.
– And she might actually get your jokes now, instead of replying “I didn’t catch that.”

Under the Hood (Spoiler: It’s Mostly OpenAI Now)
Sure, Siri still lives in the Apple ecosystem, still respects your privacy (unless you ask her something really weird), and still sounds like she’s about to give you passive-aggressive directions to your ex’s house—but now, thanks to the mind of ChatGPT, she might actually tell you how to get there without launching Maps into a black hole.

We know what you’re thinking: “Wait, didn’t Apple say they’d never rely on third parties for core intelligence?” To which we respond: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. Also: Apple Intelligence™. That’s what we’re calling it now. It sounds futuristic, a little mysterious, and very, very trademarked.

Siri + ChatGPT = The assistant you thought you had in 2011, but actually might get in 2025.

Available This Fall in iOS 26, macOS Wisteria, macOS 26, and anywhere else Siri has been pretending to help.

Siri: Now with Applectual™ Intelligence. Finally.

Contact:

Apple Public Relations
press@apple.com
(Please don’t ask Siri to send this email. It’s still… adjusting.)
Post of the century - so very very funny and so very very true.

And yeah, Apple has no choice now really as they are so far behind.

And I imagine that Tim Cook doesn't want to have AI researchers on a million plus salaries.
 
didn't people at Apple talk about A.I. and LLM a very long time ago?
They have always talked about ML, but not so much LLM no. That is the new kid on the block. Apple introduced the neural engine for AI/ML in 2017 for their A11 chip. And after that a lot of ML talk, especially on visual/image manipulation, and they have introduced some new ML utilities being on-device. Most of those are not very visible to users, and combined with the subpar experience many had with Siri, made many disappointed. I don't think it is the ML in general that is Apples problem, but they did not pivot when LLMs gained the extreme popularity. I also don't think that it is that important to people if Apple is using its own or others LLMs, but many had high expectations for Siri to be much better when they introduced Apple Intelligence last year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert and 211
This is not true. the M3 Ultra is great as an AI server. Apple can make whatever they want, they could make something even better for their servers. Apple Silicon is getting extremely popular for local AI models. Nvidia is overrated.
Tell that to Nvidia's market share by more than 90% in AI field. M3 Ultra is only RTX 5070TI's performance and it's nothing compared to A100 and newer versions. Besides, Apple dont even have any systems like CUDA which is how Nvidia dominate the market. Yet, you admitted yourself that it's good only for LOCAL AI models which is a joke.

If you still believe that Apple Silicon chip is great, why dont you explain that Apple is not able to develop AI for their own instead of relying on others just like this article?

It's only DEFYING the truth and fact after all.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Donkey Man
As some people hate to admit it, this is all because Apple didnt care about AI for a long time and yet they crippled AI teams thanks to Apple CFO. They cant even make their own AI server as Apple Silicon isn't powerful enough to replace Nvidia GPU. Since they cant even make Apple Silicon version of Mac Pro with powerful GPUs, they will not be able to research, develop, and train their own AI instead of relying on others just like they did with Intel for Mac.
According to Gurman, he states that the team behind Apple's MLX work has threatened to quick if Apple follows through with this plan. That team is doing great work and would be a blow to Apple

 
  • Wow
  • Like
Reactions: 01cowherd and BNBMS
Siri has been horrible since long before AI. What was Google doing with Android 5 years ago? Because that was better than Siri is now.
 
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Apple Upgrades Siri with ChatGPT, Admits Defeat Gracefully (Sort Of)

CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA — June 30, 2025
— In a move absolutely no one saw coming (except literally everyone), Apple today announced that Siri is now integrating ChatGPT. Yes, that ChatGPT — the one you’ve been quietly relying on for years while pretending Siri was still "learning."

After over a decade of valiantly misunderstanding your calendar invites, offering weather for countries you’ve never visited, and responding to “Remind me to take out the trash” with “Calling Trash,” Siri is finally getting the upgrade she desperately needs. And instead of pretending we invented it, we’re just borrowing someone else’s smarter kid and pretending it was our idea all along. Classic Apple.


What does this mean for you, the loyal user?
– Siri now responds like she’s read more than six articles from 2014.
– She won’t freeze when you say “Wait, no, I meant…”
– She can write poems, code, love letters, grocery lists, and fake doctor’s notes.
– And she might actually get your jokes now, instead of replying “I didn’t catch that.”

Under the Hood (Spoiler: It’s Mostly OpenAI Now)
Sure, Siri still lives in the Apple ecosystem, still respects your privacy (unless you ask her something really weird), and still sounds like she’s about to give you passive-aggressive directions to your ex’s house—but now, thanks to the mind of ChatGPT, she might actually tell you how to get there without launching Maps into a black hole.

We know what you’re thinking: “Wait, didn’t Apple say they’d never rely on third parties for core intelligence?” To which we respond: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. Also: Apple Intelligence™. That’s what we’re calling it now. It sounds futuristic, a little mysterious, and very, very trademarked.

Siri + ChatGPT = The assistant you thought you had in 2011, but actually might get in 2025.

Available This Fall in iOS 26, macOS Wisteria, macOS 26, and anywhere else Siri has been pretending to help.

Siri: Now with Applectual™ Intelligence. Finally.

Contact:

Apple Public Relations
press@apple.com
(Please don’t ask Siri to send this email. It’s still… adjusting.)

This should be an article in The Onion. 😂

I really hope Apple gives up on Siri and contracts with a third party. Siri is an abysmal embarrassment.

Apple needs an AI assistant that works. If they want to keep developing their own assistant in the background, that's fine... but in the meantime please give us usable AI!

"Calling trash" 😂
 
The big problem with AI is that people are way more impressed with something that gives you any answer confidently, rather than correctly. It doesn't matter how much hallucinated BS these things throw at people-- half the users don't bother to check it or follow-up, and think that this crap is making everything better when it's actually making things so much worse in the long term...
I think Siri actually understanding the question is at least a step in the right direction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Donkey Man
Why was this not done 2+ years ago?? Why is Apple always so behind? Talk about a need for heads to roll in their software division.
 
Why? Do you not trust Apple?
It's really getting harder to. Everything they advertise is about privacy etc, unless you sign up to one of their services - Apple Arcade.

When downloading and opening a 'game' you're hit with disclaimers about sharing data with the game developer, I mean wtf?

Surely if Apple cared, they could deal with this themselves by offering id's that are anonymised so the developer gets nothing, but no, it's left to the user to make that call by giving them Game Centre details.

If I get a service from Apple I want them to own it, not delegate responsibility.

You're seeng this repeated with ChatGPT in Apple Intelligence and no doubt Siri if it goes down that road.

They seem on being intent of giving away the keys to the kingdom that made them so great & with it the chatter of privacy that their 'respected' for.
 
It's really getting harder to. Everything they advertise is about privacy etc, unless you sign up to one of their services - Apple Arcade.

When downloading and opening a 'game' you're hit with disclaimers about sharing data with the game developer, I mean wtf?

Surely if Apple cared, they could deal with this themselves by offering id's that are anonymised so the developer gets nothing, but no, it's left to the user to make that call by giving them Game Centre details.

If I get a service from Apple I want them to own it, not delegate responsibility.

You're seeng this repeated with ChatGPT in Apple Intelligence and no doubt Siri if it goes down that road.

They seem on being intent of giving away the keys to the kingdom that made them so great & with it the chatter of privacy that their 'respected' for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnsawyercjs
Or Apple could allow users to select whatever AI service they want to train Siri. I would use Grok. I've found it quite useful.
 
Since Apple cant even make Mac Pro grade M series, it was totally expected that Apple cant even research and develop their own AI services and systems. Despite Nvidia being dominating the market, many companies already developed their own chips unlike Apple.

Clearly, this is Apple's biggest problem for not developing chips for Mac Pro and server.
 
What data is ChatGPT going to be able to “mine“ without your permission?
Depends on how deep the integration is doesn't it? Even if it's just the queries you pass Siri, they're going to use it however the hell they feel like it. OpenAI and their ilk are loudly anti-IP/privacy and at a certain point, you gotta take them at their word. Scare quote my use of the word mine if you must, but reality is that the more access these companies have to Apple's inner workings, the less of a feature privcy becomes in Apple's ecosystem.
 
That's fine for apps that have nothing to do with Apple, but what I'm taking about is a service I pay Apple for, my contract is with Apple not the game developer that's in Arcade. It's advertised as APPLE Arcade.

If I bought an App off the app store then that's what I'd expect, if I buy a service from Apple I want them to own it & deal with whatever else is needed for the service THEY are selling me, not delegate responsibility, hence the purpose of my post re; Apple Intelligence, Siri etc.
 
That video of Jobs talking about privacy, especially with iPhones and location tracking, reminds me of the pre-Apple days when he and Woz were building and selling blue boxes to make free long-distance phone calls, and the paranoia that their users had about being tracked to where they were placing the call, and the police being sent to the caller's location to be arrested. It happened a few times. I guess fortunately for me, my self-built box, from a design recommended to me by John Draper/Captain Crunch, who was the inspiration behind Woz and Jobs' early business venture, was lost before I had a real chance to use it, when my brother accidentally left it in a phone booth and was too paranoid to go back for it once he realized he no longer had it.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.