Yay, hooray! Hopefully they do develop something very soon. Now that we've grown more in computers and techy stuff, lots of people are now accessing and creating more media and this fits in perfectly.
Could the Mini setup seamlessly allow any mac on my home network to access and modify any and all movies, photos and music files thorugh iApps? keep my two iPhones 4 iPods and 2 appleTVs in check?
Ugly mock-up:
![]()
Thanks dude. You are the reason this media servers tuff does not advance as fast as it should. Buy your ****, then argue you can use it any way you want. If you are just ripping netflix, then you are stealing.
![]()
What he is doing- copying netflix movies to his hard drive is stealing.
I am pretty die-hard about my right to view the media I have purchased any way I want to
I would say that this is not going to happen because it is already basically the time capsule and they can firmware update it to do these things if they wanted. My setup is all music, tv shows, and movies, applications, podcasts, etc... all on my time capsule. Then I just add those files into iTunes on my MacBook. Then this way everything is streamed and can be accessed on all the computers in the house. Also then when I want to watch something on my apple tv I just start streaming, the time capsule boots up and it plays... Pretty close to a home server if u ask me. Yea it doesn't have sync capabilities with other computers but I can access everything from everywhere in the house. I can also print and backup on the external harddrive connected to the time capsule though a USB hub. Maybe u guys need more but it works great and that's why I don't think they will make a home server. But hey if they do then sweet but my needs are met.![]()
The new HP looks superb value for money and the mac support, even though limited, is a welcome addition. And that's the problem.....
Look at what the Cheap HP offers; 1 x 750gb hotswappable drive with space for three more, 2gb ram, E-sata and 3x USB2 ports. All that for $549. Compare that with a 1tb time capsule at $499.
Makes total sense. I've come to the conclusion that after 3 months of copying moves from my NetFlicks subscription, and trying to view them on three separate Macs, there has to be a better way.
Well, first off you might want to consider stopping pirating content...
Two words: FAIR USE
Since I do not lease, redistribute, sell access, allow downloading, rent or otherwise share the movies I make copies of, I don't see how this is pirating. Using your definition, copying pages from a book at the library strictly for personal use only would be "pirating content".
A mini would be an awful form factor for a media server. A hardware box for this would need desktop hard drives, and preferably space for more than one drive.
I agree with others who have said that the functionality should be available in software and not require another apple hardware unit (although I have no objection to them selling one, just don't make it mandatory for the software functionality).
Well, first off you might want to consider stopping pirating content...
Thanks dude. You are the reason this media servers tuff does not advance as fast as it should. Buy your ****, then argue you can use it any way you want. If you are just ripping netflix, then you are stealing.
![]()
Here here. Ripping and converting a DVD is not piracy unless copies are distributed, especially for money. If I want to watch a movie on my Apple TV 10 weeks after the DVD it was ripped from was returned to the video store that is my prerogative. Money has changed hands for the rental so everyone from the video store clerk to the actors in the film get paid and in most cases I would watch the movie once and forget about it. Fair use?
The blatant Drobo rip offs ...
Those HP mediaSmart are pretty expensive as well!
But how is a server being left running 24/7 any better than leaving your main computer running with the monitor off? I just see this home server concept as a product for a very small niche of enthusiasts.
Two words: FAIR USE
Since I do not lease, redistribute, sell access, allow downloading, rent or otherwise share the movies I make copies of, I don't see how this is pirating. Using your definition, copying pages from a book at the library strictly for personal use only would be "pirating content".
Here here. Ripping and converting a DVD is not piracy unless copies are distributed, especially for money. If I want to watch a movie on my Apple TV 10 weeks after the DVD it was ripped from was returned to the video store that is my prerogative. Money has changed hands for the rental so everyone from the video store clerk to the actors in the film get paid and in most cases I would watch the movie once and forget about it. Fair use?