That only applies to iPhone and not other products such as mac or watch etc,.How can this possibly be better than the iPhone Upgrade program?
You pay for the device monthly and can trade in every year or keep it after 2 years.
That only applies to iPhone and not other products such as mac or watch etc,.How can this possibly be better than the iPhone Upgrade program?
You pay for the device monthly and can trade in every year or keep it after 2 years.
I didn't buy it upfront. I'm paying it off over the course of two years, like most other people. The difference is I'll own the device and cease payments, unlike someone utilizing a hardware subscription.You forget the many many many many people who are not as rich as you with cash on the hip to afford buy upfront.
Sadly we are not going back to the 1950's so I guess some people will just need to get used to it.Thought exactly the same.
I’d rather pay more for ownership, the future is going to be unbelievably distopian.
My wife and I own everything outright, people need more self control.
No, the devices will be simply recycled or sold on the 2nd life market such as overseas in developing markets where they do not thousands of dollars to just plop down for a new mac etc.how is this compatible with Apple's ecological goals? are they going to rent iPhones used by 10 people before just with swapped battery?
Sadly not everyone can afford thousands of dollars to buy a new device all the time and own it.I went from a 6S to a 13 Pro and the performance of the 6S was pretty dam good still. It was all the other improvements added together that really had the biggest impact.
I still think owning your phone outright then selling it will be a cheaper total cost of ownership, plus you aren’t leasing a phone.
It makes sense for a business from a tax standpoint and asset/inventory management. It can for individuals too but not as likely....most businesses just lease computer equipment...
That is a good point. I live in the U.K and there are a lot of tax breaks you can get for renting/subscribing etc. It is possible for example to get some of your electricity or gas (natural gas not what Americans call gasoline) paid for as just one example.Remember, always, you are not the only person in the world...
In the case of autos, there are apparently tax benefits to renting a car. The same sort if thing may hold (I know nothing about this area of tax law) if you rent your phone and use it for business purposes, or for phones that are purchased (and now will be rented) by organizations.
Along a different dimension, renting provides optionality, whether of the form "I just need this for one month to put together the movie I am creating", or of the form "I can't tell if I want a small phone or a big one, let me try for a month and see".
Seriously, this whole concept of owning nothing and making payments on everything you “own” in perpetuity is nuts. I’ll keep my mortgage and my paid-for car thank you. Same goes for my electronics. I’m not a Rent-a-Center customer and don’t intend to be a customer for this either.
WEF says, “Why don’t you want to be happy?” ?I'm not renting software, so I'm certainly not renting hardware.
Well here's the thing, I don't want to pay monthly for Adobe Lightroom, I want to buy the current version for $200 or whatever and be able to use it until it no longer runs due to some OS incompatibility.
I did that with Lightroom 6, and I still use it...
I paid $129... if I would've subscribed to Creative Cloud, I would've paid at least $830 by now.
That's why people hate subscriptions for software.
I can't install it directly on the new version of macOS because the installer isn't 64-bit, but it will still run if it was installed prior to upgrading...
Yep. As much as people rave about Affinity Publisher and Sketch and the like, at the end of the day many aspects of the design industry are locked into Creative Cloud. I could see replacing it for personal projects, but the minute you have to freelance and deliver files in a format your client expects, you'll be right back to Adobe.
It always comes as a great comfort to me to know I'm not alone in understanding the origin of this phrase, what it means and its implications.
Makes complete sense given that they've emphasized recycling in the past few years. It's obviously fantastic that they're doing that, but it also paves the way for consumers to feel less guilty about trading in devices frequently via subscription.
Apple is developing a hardware subscription service that would allow customers to "subscribe" and receive an iPhone or other Apple device as part of their subscription, similar to the way current Apple subscriptions like iCloud work, reports Bloomberg.
![]()
Customers would be able to pay a monthly subscription fee and gain access to a device for the subscription period. This would be ideal for customers who do not have the funds to buy an expensive iPhone, iPad, or Mac up front, but who can afford a monthly price for the device, plus it would bring in more revenue for Apple.
Apple is said to be aiming to make the process of buying an iPhone or an iPad "on par" with purchasing iCloud storage or paying for an Apple Music subscription, with customers able to subscribe to hardware with their Apple ID and App Store account.
Compared to the iPhone Upgrade Program, it would differ because Apple would charge a yet-to-be-determined monthly fee rather than splitting the cost of a device across a 12 or 24 month period. It would also cover other products while the iPhone Upgrade Program is limited to the iPhone.
It is possible that Apple will allow subscription users to swap out their devices for updated models when refreshed products are released, and Apple has had discussions internally about tying the subscription program to Apple One bundles and AppleCare support plans.
Customers would be able to purchase a hardware subscription on their devices, through the App Store, through the company's website, or at an Apple online store.
According to Bloomberg, the service will be Apple's "biggest push yet" into recurring sales, but the project is still in development and little is known about it at this time. Apple has been working on it for months, but it was pushed back to allow Apple to focus on a separate "buy now, pay later" service that is designed to allow customers to pay for Apple Pay purchases in installments over time.
Apple is working to implement hardware subscriptions by the end of 2022, but it could be delayed into 2023 or canceled entirely should Apple decide to go in a different direction.
Article Link: Apple Developing Hardware Subscription Service for iPhones and Other Devices
Many people, myself included would disagree and think it is a great idea.I would call the practice you described predatory. But, if the equipment has regular maintenance costs or predictable performance degradation, and you benefit financially by replacing it before it stops working, renting hardware could save money in the long run.
For many people, however, I don’t think it’s a good idea.
It is not a lease!I seriously doubt you will get a 1-month term for this garbage. You’ll pay for early termination of a 1-2 year lease.
You are both wrong as you seem to think everyone is as rich as you are!agreed, but not everyone looks at it that way. they say "I can afford $65 a month for a new phone" and never think they'll end up paying $1500 for a $900 item.