Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
For Macs running Mac OS X v10.5 or earlier, you can better protect yourself from this malware by disabling Java in your web browser(s) preferences.

That's the best they can come up with?
Disable java??
So, if I get a virus on my old macbook then Apple's recommends to stop using it???

:mad:
 
I just love how sheep continue to spin this by saying, "It's not a virus, it's a trojan.", "It's not a virus, it's malware.", etc....
BOTTOM LINE: To the everyday user who bought a Mac because "it doesn't get viruses", IT'S AN INFECTION. End of story. Virus, Malware, Trojan, or whatever, the everyday user doesn't care about the technical definitions. To them it just means problems they don't want. So stop trying to get technical about it. That's Apple's job when trying to come out with a patch.
With Apple's popularity, did you really think it wasn't going to get the attention of the mischievous ones. It's only gonna get worse from here. So strap yourselves in and get ready, it's gonna be a bumpy ride.

Best response yet to all these fanboys screaming, "Its not a virus! Its just a trojan..." I like Apple products, but who cares what it is. It can download and screw up your system without any action on your part other than visiting an infected page while Java is running. Apple screwed up big time being 2 months late with the update.
 
That's the best they can come up with?
Disable java??
So, if I get a virus on my old macbook then Apple's recommends to stop using it???

:mad:

That's pretty much Apple for you. You either stick with them, keep in their garden, keep up with their garden, or you don't matter.

Such is life in the walled garden, and those walls aren't getting any smaller. They are getting higher and higher.

----------

What this article is describing is a trojan, not a virus. It's easy to use malware terminology interchangeably but it's just wrong. 's like calling a dog a "catdog"

Horrible analogy..

It's more like calling a spider an insect. Or say calling Rooibos a tea. It's not really that big of a deal. Sure, it's technically wrong but they both have similarities and in the big picture it simply doesn't matter to someone who doesn't know or care to know they have bigger things to worry about.
 
Good question. Honestly, I'm surprised that there hasn't been a windows fanboy, in the 10 years that OS X has been released, that got tired of all the Apple fans cheering "Macs don't get viruses! Take that windows users!" and decided to write a wild virus for macs just out of spite. Maybe I'm underestimating the difficulty of such a task...

Virus spreading today is very inefficient compared to Trojans and worms, regardless of the operating system. In the eighties and early nineties it was the best way to infect PCs, because most of them were not connected to networks and people exchanged lots of programs from PC to PC via floppies. Nowadays, it's not hard to develop a virus and install it on one PC, but it's unlikely that it spreads to other computers unless you provide additional mechanisms besides those of a virus. That's the reason why viruses today are much less of a concern than Trojans or worms.
 
Good question. Honestly, I'm surprised that there hasn't been a windows fanboy, in the 10 years that OS X has been released, that got tired of all the Apple fans cheering "Macs don't get viruses! Take that windows users!" and decided to write a wild virus for macs just out of spite. Maybe I'm underestimating the difficulty of such a task...

No, you're underestimating Windows users. Believe it or not, they haven't been sitting around for ten years waiting for this to happen. They have their own platform that gets security updates every Tuesday, before problems like this get a chance to take a significant hold. Most of them don't even know this has happened.

What worries me as a Mac user is the attitude of other Mac users. If you give Apple a free ride on stuff like this, then they'll screw up when it really matters.

Apple is responsible because they wanted to develop their own version of Java. The Oracle version was fixed in February. The Apple version was not. The responsibility for this lies entirely with Apple.
 
While I think that Apple should have acted much earlier on this whole thing, I do think this is quite astounding:

Apple Support said:
Apple is working with ISPs worldwide to disable this command and control network.

Isn't it quite unusual for a software- / hardwaremaker to get involved in such a way ?

---

On another note:
I always hoped that Apple might be secretly developing an integrated antivirus / -trojan / -malware solution which they could activate instantly when things get rough. Much like the "Just in case scenario" when Macs were still running on PowerPC CPUs and Apple was secretly developing every OS X release for x86 as well. I guess I hoped for too much there.
 
Isn't it quite unusual for a software- / hardwaremaker to get involved in such a way ?
No. Command & Control centres are regularly disabled, and taken control of by security forces. When possible, it is used also to tell the malware infected machines to uninstall the malware itself.

For worms, its also not uncommon to deploy a 'patcher worm' that'll use the same distribution method as the malware - but one that runs around patching the machines of the used vulnerability, and again removes the malware worm (Along with itself after a set amount of time).
 
That's the best they can come up with?
Disable java??
So, if I get a virus on my old macbook then Apple's recommends to stop using it???

:mad:

Its great advice and one GGStudios has said for a long time if you check his faq.

Do you really need Java enabled anyway?

Its a simple solution and an effective one without compromising the usability of you machine.
 
Its great advice and one GGStudios has said for a long time if you check his faq.

Do you really need Java enabled anyway?

Depends on the user. I know a couple of people who use MoneyDance for personal finance, which is written in Java.

For developers, you have Eclipse and IntelliJ (yes, a lot of Java applications are actually written on the Mac platform).

And as it happens, the only alternative IDE for Cocoa development is also written in Java.

----------

Does it true that over 600,000 Macs has been infected?

Well, no one can say with absolute certainly that that is the correct figure. Both Dr Web and Kaspersky admit that the techniques they use may falsely identify the type of machine in certain circumstances.

But 600,000 is probably accurate, yes.
 
and they said macs dont get viruses

When it's on Windows it's a virus. When it's on Mac that's when you have to be specific :rolleyes:

I love how defensive people are getting in this thread.

No, Macs don't have to worry about PC viruses. In the much the same way I'll never have to worry about dying because I blew a cylinder while jogging down the street.

It's not really a bragging point, you know.

I love that analogy! :)
 
Love all the, "Its Java not Apple!" Comments. If you get food poisoning from Taco Bell do you blame the meat supplier? No you blame Taco Bell for not handling the food properly. Same issue here. Apple is serving us a version of Java that is old and not safe to eat. Apple repackages and redistributes Java themselves and its not like we can just upgrade to the latest patched Java version like Windows users. Its ok that Apple is wrong sometimes. Everyone is wrong sometimes.


This is great news for consumers. This is why we use Macs because Apple is always working for us.


You do realize Apple could have prevented this from happening months ago but instead they chose to ignore it.
 
This is great news for consumers. This is why we use Macs because Apple is always working for us.

Apple is working to fix a public relations clusterf**k of its own making. We're just reaping the benefits.

I know a lot of people hate the IT press when they go after Apple, but if they didn't then a lot of this stuff might not get fixed.
 
Regarding the "trojan vs. virus" debate ...

I had always thought that trojans were malware that the user had to explicitly let into their system. Sort like how the Trojans tricked the Greeks??? into letting a big horse filled with Trojan soldiers into their fort.

This Flashback thing seems to install itself without user intervention, once the user visits a malicious/hacked webpage.

So, is Flashback truly a trojan? Or is it something of a hybrid?

ft
 
What this article is describing is a trojan, not a virus. It's easy to use malware terminology interchangeably but it's just wrong. 's like calling a dog a "catdog"

Trojan = Backdoor maker, often dumps keyloggers and system monitors on. Scrapes CC#s, passwords, etc. These days often come up under the guise of a rogue security product or system optimizer. Can definitely cause system issues but in and of itself is not likely to cause immediate data loss. These are used more for making botnets and stealing info for cash.

Virus = Infects system files (but isn't limited to only those), replicates, and/or injects malicious code into legitimate files. Often can be polymorphic to avoid detection with traditional signature-based methodologies. Worms are in the same family tree as a virus, except they don't need to act as a parasite to another file, they are standalone. This means they are plenty likely to be able to do things like install more trojans and invite rootkits/viruses etc.

Yes, to an unsavvy user, one might feel like it doesn't matter, but truthfully, OSX is a paradise compared to PC land and the sheer magnitude of exploitable environment there is to offer there. Even if Apple got 50% of the comp users in the world using it, OSX would be less likely to be infected on the whole, and still would likely be virus-free. It's a very locked-down environment. Ultimately though it's up to the user. Even with great AV solutions and behavioral detection there will be grey-area stuff that doesn't fall into a good file or bad file area right away. Common sense still holds a premium in internet security.

Dude, its like saying on a PC you can die from Aids or/and Cancer..... and on a mac you just get Cancer! I for one am kinda pissed you can now get cancer on a mac!!!!!!!! To be honest I cannot remember the last time I actually got a virus on a PC...

Least on my PC I have a truckload of programs to screen my system. On a mac, I can read about it on Macrumours or the news.... yipee thats proactive!

The only security is to stay off the internet! Common sense... and internet... please! You way way way overestimate your average user.
 
java, flash and even pdf is always one of the hole that is open.

but it is unlucky to avoid using them as they are too commonly available and required for some website to work.
 
Apple dropped the ball on this one. Things like this happen, Apple is not perfect and no one expects them to be. But instead of blindly defending them we, the Mac community and their customers, should be saying to Apple, "This is not acceptable, things have got to change. Waiting till after a serious outbreak to patch a vulnerability that was vendor patched months ago is not acceptable."

How many Macs actually, really, have this reported problem. The 600,000 number sure looks like an exaggerated SWAG to me. Most of my friends and I have Intego VirusBarrier X6 installed which is able to detect this problem, but none have had it reported. Please post if you know "first-hand" of anyone with this problem.
 
and they said macs dont get viruses
They can. They have in the past, before Mac OS X. They don't since Mac OS X, only because none have been released into the wild.
i tH0uGt d4t aPpl3 d1dnT g3t v1ru5es?
tH3y 5ti11 d0n'T.
Macs don't get malware
Yes, they do. They get trojans, but not viruses.
I just love how sheep continue to spin this by saying, "It's not a virus, it's a trojan.",
And by "sheep", you mean "informed users who know the difference", of course!
Virus, Malware, Trojan, or whatever, the everyday user doesn't care about the technical definitions.
The difference determines the proper defense. I love the approach that "the masses are ignorant of the differences, so rather than try to learn and inform others of the facts, let's just join the masses in their ignorance!"
As much of a machead as I am... even *I* can't gloss over the fact Apple dropped the ball on this.
They absolutely did. It's far from being the only time. They dropped the ball by shipping Macs with the default settings of having the firewall disabled and Java enabled (for the versions that shipped with Java installed), and "Open "safe" files after downloading" enabled in Safari, to name a few. The good news is that a user can pick up the ball by correcting such things. I don't leave the security of my computers in the hands of a hardware or software company. I take responsibility to make sure my own computers are secure. Did Apple drop the ball? Absolutely! Did it affect my computers that they did? Not at all.
When it's on Windows it's a virus. When it's on Mac that's when you have to be specific
There's a reason for the distinction between the two platforms. If all malware could be easily avoided by practicing safe computing, and all users practiced safe computing, there would be no need for antivirus software. However, a virus changes things. Once a virus is released in the wild for a platform, practicing safe computing is no longer sufficient to provide a complete defense. At that point, antivirus software is required. Once you have a dependency on antivirus apps, they can be used against both viruses and other forms of malware.

No OS is immune to malware, especially the greatest threat to security: the user. With Windows, the "virus cat" has already been let out of the bag, so running antivirus has become common for Windows users. If and when a virus is released in the wild for Mac OS X or later, the same will be true for Mac users. We're just not there yet, since safe computing practices can still completely protect against all Mac OS X malware in the wild.

Macs are not immune to malware, but no true viruses exist in the wild that can run on Mac OS X, and there never have been any since it was released over 10 years ago. The only malware in the wild that can affect Mac OS X is a handful of trojans, which can be easily avoided by practicing safe computing (see below). Also, Mac OS X Snow Leopard and Lion have anti-malware protection built in, further reducing the need for 3rd party antivirus apps.
  1. Make sure your built-in Mac firewall is enabled in System Preferences > Security > Firewall

  2. Uncheck "Open "safe" files after downloading" in Safari > Preferences > General

  3. Uncheck "Enable Java" in Safari > Preferences > Security. This will completely protect you from the Flashback malware. Leave this unchecked until you visit a trusted site that requires Java, then re-enable only for your visit to that site. (This is not to be confused with JavaScript, which you should leave enabled.)

  4. Change your DNS servers to OpenDNS servers by reading this.

  5. Be careful to only install software from trusted, reputable sites. Never install pirated software. If you're not sure about an app, ask in this forum before installing.

  6. Never let someone else have access to install anything on your Mac.

  7. Don't open files that you receive from unknown or untrusted sources.

  8. Make sure all network, email, financial and other important passwords are complex, including upper and lower case letters, numbers and special characters.

  9. Always keep your Mac and application software updated. Use Software Update for your Mac software. For other software, it's safer to get updates from the developer's site or from the menu item "Check for updates", rather than installing from any notification window that pops up while you're surfing the web.
That's all you need to do to keep your Mac completely free of any virus, trojan, spyware, keylogger, or other malware. You don't need any 3rd party software to keep your Mac secure.
 
Love all the, "Its Java not Apple!" Comments. If you get food poisoning from Taco Bell do you blame the meat supplier? No you blame Taco Bell for not handling the food properly. Same issue here. Apple is serving us a version of Java that is old and not safe to eat. Apple repackages and redistributes Java themselves and its not like we can just upgrade to the latest patched Java version like Windows users. Its ok that Apple is wrong sometimes. Everyone is wrong sometimes.

It could also be said that Apple doesn't "serve" it anymore and hasn't done since the release of lion.

If you want to eat off the menu then expect it to get less attention than the normal dishes.

:D
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.