I really never understood what was Tim Cook's problem with the 27" model. It was my favourite. Now what to do? Maybe I should go and hunt for an imac pro at bargain.
Apart from being three times the price...
Yea I get it. I spent $3000 for a 2020 Intel 27" imac and I'm torn.Definitely a shame. My Dad's been holding out with his 2010 iMac, waiting for the equivalent Apple Silicon replacement. Not sure what his budget is, but this is definitely much higher than the iMac was, both on the low end and the high end.
I paid about $3500 for my maxed out late 2015 iMac (upgraded everything but RAM), and I would generally expect similar money to get me close to the current top end. But now that's the entry level. Even if you consider inflation (my iMac was $4100 in 2022 dollars), it's much closer to the new low end than the high end (approaching $10k for maxed out M1 Ultra + Studio Display!).
Obviously that new low end is more powerful than my top end was, but that's to be expected with any improvement in technology over time. It just feels like a worse value proposition when equivalent expenditure gets you something lower relative to the new product range.
It'll be interesting to see what people decide to do with the display - pay the ever-increasing Apple Tax for the Studio Display, or pay half or less for a very nice competing monitor? I do like the increased flexibility of not having your computer physically tied to your display, but ugh, the cost of that flexibility...
Yea I get it. I spent $3000 for a 2020 Intel 27" imac and I'm torn.
The competing 5K display from LG doesn’t have speakers or a camera built in.
HUGE mistake! the 27" iMac was perfect for designers and especially education. Schools won't buy these higher end options nor will they purchase the smaller iMacs.
Where is that? In the refurbished section? I see one discounted iMac Pro, the rest not discounted.I’m seeing used iMac Pro 1,1 greatly discounted online. Maybe this will be my last Mojave computer.
I suspect that they might come out with a Mac mini with the M1 Pro, though I don't think they will add the "Pro" name, that gets too confusing when you have the Mac Pro. Better to just call it the Mac Mini (with M1 Pro BTO chip) just like you used to be able to order the Mini with an i3, and i5, or an i7. that would probably slot into that price gap you mentioned.Where I live, an M1 Mini, with 16GB Memory and 1TB Storage is NZ$2249. The base M1 Max Studio with just the storage upgraded to 1TB is NZ$3949. That is a huge gap, admittedly for a much more capable machine, but an M1 Pro Machine between the 2 would be the sweet spot for me.
I'm ok sticking with my intel iMac for now, and wait and see what they do with the intel Mini.
Schools are more likely to get the 24" iMac.HUGE mistake! the 27" iMac was perfect for designers and especially education. Schools won't buy these higher end options nor will they purchase the smaller iMacs.
Remember the rumors last week that a new iMac Pro would be launched in 2023.I really never understood what was Tim Cook's problem with the 27" model. It was my favourite. Now what to do? Maybe I should go and hunt for an imac pro at bargain.
By no means can a 60hz display be considered futureproof. You're misrepresenting how awful an investment that display is.Well the RAM starts at 32GB with the Mac Studio, and upgrading to that with the old 27” iMac was a significant cost.
Perhaps the initial outlay is more than you’d like to spend, but once you’ve got the display you can pair it with future Mac Studio models at less cost.
Normally I'd agree but all apple options including (seemingly) the new Mac Studio don't offer upgradability so that point is moot. Everything is soldered on so you need to select your CPU/GPU, RAM, and storage space and once you do there's no going back unless it's the Mac Pro. Historically 27" iMacs offered upgradable RAM, one of the last hold outs to do so in fact. That ability will be missed.Nah.. all-in-ones are generally stupid, especially high end ones. Only way to upgrade them is to replace the whole thing, including perfectly good screen. Poor cooling form factor, and they just look bad with their giant besels.
A nice small besel display paired with a small desktop or a laptop is a much nicer combination. For receptionists and school computer labs - 24" iMac is more than sufficient.
It was a great move by Apple to dump 27" iMac.
That is the old Intel Mini that is expected to be replaced by an upgraded Apple Silicon Mini later in the year.Don’t know where you got this information, but you definitely can on the higher-end Mac mini, which is the device I was talking aboutView attachment 1969948
The M1 Mini may be faster than most past 27" iMacs in CPU power but definitely not in GPU power. There is a gap here in their offering which makes this quite inflexible to customers in my opinion. The entry-level GPU on the 2019 27" iMac is a Radeon Pro 570X which out computes the top level option for the M1 Mac Mini 8-core GPU.Schools are more likely to get the 24" iMac.
Those designers could by a Mac mini and couple it with the new Studio monitor. The M1 Mini is faster than almost all models of the previous 27" iMac. Once the upgrade to the M2 later this year, the performance will be more and they might be able to get up to 32GB of RAM. alternately Apple may add an M1 Pro option to the Mini.
In either case, this change gives more flexibility to the customers.
I work for a university, and they have a list which offers two options for desktop Macs that can be purchased without requiring an exception from IT, and those are currently the Mac mini and 24" iMac. It hasn't been an issue so far, as far as I know.HUGE mistake! the 27" iMac was perfect for designers and especially education. Schools won't buy these higher end options nor will they purchase the smaller iMacs.
K-12 schools, probably. However as other posters have said - for tertiary education/college level, teaching advanced design, animation, video, visual arts, the 24" isn't enough both in terms of screen and computing power. I'm a design student and the only Macs we have anywhere on campus are 27" iMacs (and there are labs full of them).Schools are more likely to get the 24" iMac.
Let’s not forget that the M1 Mac mini is more powerful than most offered 27 inch iMacs excepting some of the most powerful options. So the 1599 dollar studio display + M1 Mac mini of 699 is likely the new iMac 27 inch entry comparison price. So like 2300 dollars. And the iMac 27 inch started at 1799.
Hmm I forget the keyboard and mouse (99 dollar without Touch ID and 79 dollar for mouse) which were also included with iMac. So almost 2500 starting price compared to 1799…. A 700 dollar increase is indeed a lot.