Probably because it was real easy to download the trial and find a copy of an activation code online somewhere.
You didn't even have to do that, all you had to do was edit a plist preference from trial to retail.
Probably because it was real easy to download the trial and find a copy of an activation code online somewhere.
Yep, on Windows machines, too. You can't open anything made on Word 2007 doesn't write for anything before that.
iWork gets regular updates, some notable ones occurred with the release of Lion.
Upgrades to new versions, however, are less frequent. We'd *like" an iWork (particularly Pages) update, but it isn't drastically necessary at the moment. There is nothing dated or long-in-the tooth about, say, Pages. It in fact does what it's supposed to do spectacularly well and has gotten excellent reception even now, considering the last major upgrade was in 2009.
That being said, I'd certainly be quite happy with a new Pages, for instance, that hopefully adopts some features found in Mellel. But I'm not exactly clamoring for them. Perhaps others are, though.
I doubt piracy bothers Apple when you can only run Apple software on Macs anyway. I highly doubt Apple's software-only revenue streams come even close to Mac/iPhone/iPad revenue streams.
The Mac App store doesn't allow Trials for anyone. Apple moved their software under the Mac App store roof. One place to buy, no confusion.
Apple abandoned consistency & user friendly manners.
Apple is way too big. Another USDOJ investigation would not suprise me.
And this is supposed to make us feel better?
Apple is simply in the process of trying to lock the desktop environment as tight as they've locked iOS.
based on the misguided direction this move seems to indicate Apple is heading
Preventing me from trying the software is essentially severing a major way of my ability to do my homework.
Also, the cheap apps (<$20 say) do not warrant the time investment needed to research it. Best to let me try it and return it if I don't like it.
And this is supposed to make us feel better?
Apple is simply in the process of trying to lock the desktop environment as tight as they've locked iOS.
Big Brother, indeed.
Only a fanboy can cheer such a move.
I've used Office for as long as I can remember and have never gotten errors about it not being genuine.![]()
non sequitur.
Apple removing trial software from their website has nothing to do with locking down the OS. People tend to see what they want to see.
Thats because people who purchase software usually don't deal with those issues.
I get that Apple is trying to avoid upgrade vs. full purchase by selling apps at upgrade pricing level. At the same time, denying existing customers even the slightest discount can discourage many from upgrading at all (who would upgrade otherwise). Perhaps companies of Apple's size doesn't need to care, but revenue from upgrade can be a good deal of money for what ultimately amounts to just a bit of bandwidth.I think you have your answer in Aperture changing from $200 to $80 and Final Cut changing from a $1200 suite to a $300 single program.
That's Apple's new upgrade plan...just spreading the cost out over all versions instead of front-loading the major cost onto the first version you buy.
There could be an infinite amount of reasons why the applications were removed as trials.
I get that Apple is trying to avoid upgrade vs. full purchase by selling apps at upgrade pricing level. At the same time, denying existing customers even the slightest discount can discourage many from upgrading at all (who would upgrade otherwise). Perhaps companies of Apple's size doesn't need to care, but revenue from upgrade can be a good deal of money for what ultimately amounts to just a bit of bandwidth.
If Mac App Store wants to capture larger percentage of apps distribution, it would need to offer (1) upgrading pricing model, (2) trial/refund window, and (3) grace period for recent purchase.
The reasons why it was removed don't matter much, not to me, anyway. The way it affects my ability to research the product effectively does.
The way it hinders my willingness to purchase the product should matter to Apple.
I am currently evaluating Lightroom 4 (30 day free trial). Next I will evaluate Photoshop CS6. Then I'll decide whether to buy LR4 or upgrade from CS5. Aperture has just lost the opportunity to even be a candidate.
Apple really should have a way to enter an Aperture 3 serial number and receive a copy of it in the App Store.
I know this is a little off topic but I purchased iWork 09 before I had lion through the trial and then upgraded with the serial number. Now on my new computer I have installed it from the trial but when I try to update it refuses. Any suggestions? I also complicated this by thinking I had to install the app store version. Now I have the app store version of pages and the original versions of numbers and keynote installed. Can I reinstall without losing my templates and whatnot?
Is that assessment based on anything? Updates are free in the app store aren't they? So to charge us for a new version of Pages, etc., they'd have to make it a new app store product (e.g. Pages '12).That's what it looks like.nutmac said:[*]Is Apple going to charge full retail price for major version upgrade?
I get that Apple is trying to avoid upgrade vs. full purchase by selling apps at upgrade pricing level. At the same time, denying existing customers even the slightest discount can discourage many from upgrading at all (who would upgrade otherwise). Perhaps companies of Apple's size doesn't need to care, but revenue from upgrade can be a good deal of money for what ultimately amounts to just a bit of bandwidth.
If Mac App Store wants to capture larger percentage of apps distribution, it would need to offer (1) upgrading pricing model, (2) trial/refund window, and (3) grace period for recent purchase.
poor old ApertureIf you are a photographer then PScs6 will be a big upgrade.
The reasons why it was removed don't matter much, not to me, anyway. The way it affects my ability to research the product effectively does.
The way it hinders my willingness to purchase the product should matter to Apple.
I am currently evaluating Lightroom 4 (30 day free trial). Next I will evaluate Photoshop CS6. Then I'll decide whether to buy LR4 or upgrade from CS5. Aperture has just lost the opportunity to even be a candidate.
Well on Mac, perhaps.. (although I have not had any issues to note) But on my Windows machine, I have MS Office 2007 and can work with documents from any version. Same goes to what I create.. Any other version can work with it just fine..
I'm as much of an Apple fan as anyone, but compared to Word 2011 Pages is garbage. Not only is it lacking many features, but it also has compatibility issues with MS Office. Last I checked we are living in an "Office" world so perfect compatibility is a must.
...
I hate to admit that Microsoft does something better then Apple, but when it comes to Office Suites there is no comparison.
This is simply a stupid move, they should just have an iwork lite/free or something in the app store that has limited features and if people are happy they would most likely purchase the full version, this way they are just increasing piracy or new customers who wanna try before they buy...
I fully understand why Apple is doing that, making up for smaller margin by increasing demand (with lower pricing). And since Apple also generate revenue from hardware sales (which would benefit from lower software pricing compared to similar software running on Windows), it can afford to sacrifice margin.Prior to the Mac App Store opening Aperture was $199 in boxed form. Upgrades were half that. So across two full major release (likely around 4 years) someone who bought in at full price and then upgraded spent $300 ($200 initially and then $100 upgrade) Today with the Mac App Store the same person buys in at $80 and then pays another $80 for the full upgrade. So they've saved almost half of what they would have paid prior.
Is it wrong to try before you buy now? I really don't see why Apple have done this. I think they should at least add a 'Trial' or 'Demo' button to the Mac App Store page.