Metz said Apple believes the existing port selection is "very complimentary to the thin and light design of the product."
She's in marketing, all right! Too bad we couldn't get a real answer.
Metz said Apple believes the existing port selection is "very complimentary to the thin and light design of the product."
Yeah, that's cool, but I never use stuff like that. It's still a PITA to have all the ports on one side for normal use.One of the benefits of having both on one side is to use a dock like this:
![]()
Anker USB C Hub for MacBook, 7-in-2 USB C to C Adapter, Compatible with Thunderbolt 3 Port, 100W Power Delivery, 4K HDMI, USBC& 2 USB-A Data Ports, SD and microSD Card Reader
Anker 7-in-2 USB C Hub with 4K HDMI Power Delivery SD/microSD Card Reader and 2 USB 3 0 Portsa.co
Needs 2 USB-C ports on same side.
Like what? I'm going to laugh if the teardowns show Apple used the same board from the MBA 13" and just filled in empty space with battery and called it a day.There really is more than meets the eye to achieve a structurally sound 15" enclosure at basically the same thickness as the 13".
How much bigger is the screen % wise?It’s actually disappointing that they have the same battery life, considering the 15” has a 25% bigger battery
Nothing new, when Apple went back to using MagSafe, they also went back to only having a charging port on one side. It had been that way for a long time before USB-C charging. Keep your battery charged and don't plug it inI don't mind having just the two USB-C ports, but I really do hate that everything is on one side. It's very annoying to use your Mac with the cord awkwardly jammed in from the wrong side because a wall outlet is on your right.
It also has 25% more pixels, that’s why.It’s actually disappointing that they have the same battery life, considering the 15” has a 25% bigger battery
Except the battery doesn't just power the display. It powers the system board also.Really fancy way of saying, “we put in a bigger battery to feed the larger LCD.”
The battery has 26% more capacity, exactly proportional to the larger display area.
The display is by far the biggest factor in average battery life though.Except the battery doesn't just power the display. It powers the system board also.
16” MBP compared to 14” MBP has (approximately)It also has 25% more pixels, that’s why.
Education buying season. October is too late for school purchases with many universities/high schools starting in August.I don’t have any issues, the only perplexing thing to me is the timing. Why not release it in October with an M3?
Same here. Light weight and more ports. This is what I need as a teacher. HDMI, SD-Card slot, a few USB 3, and a USB-A port. MagSafe including the good old LED, to show if it is done charging. Oh.. and a biiiiggggg internal disk. We don't have any internet connection at school. Therefore, I need everything online (including all books etc.).Bring back ports to the thin and light. Prefer thin and light laptop by a big margin. Don’t need 120Hz; don’t need active cooling; don’t need chonk and weigh, don’t need professional level of power; don’t need 3+ Thunderbolt 4. Do want SD Card for occasional use and HDMI is a no-brainier for projector compatibility. Hate dongles.
It’s a middle manager giving a softball interview with Tom’s Guide. But people here have long clamored for a 15” MacBook Air. Now we have one. It wasn’t center stage at WWDC last week. It got a brief introduction.It has a slightly larger display and two additional speakers compared to the 13-inch model.
Why do they need an interview to communicate that?
My guess is that TSMC’s yields on the 3nm process will delay the M3 to early 2024. The A17 for the iPhone 15 will use up all 3nm capacity for now. Apple wants the 15” MacBook Air out now when people are buying notebooks for college.I don’t have any issues, the only perplexing thing to me is the timing. Why not release it in October with an M3?