Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple does not plan to name a replacement for vice president of industrial design Evans Hankey when she departs the company in the coming months, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. Instead, the report claims that Apple's product design team will report directly to the company's operations chief Jeff Williams, in what is a major internal shift.
Thats an assumption by Mark Grumman. He's always trying to spin things like this negatively for hits to his articles. If Apple successfully launches multiple products in 2023, what would it matter?
 
Last edited:
A truly stupid-a$$ move Apple. Just eff up more products and hope the card carrying fan club members keep buying your garbage...
Yes, I hope they keep eff-ing up more products so us cool kids in the Apple fan club can buy them. I can't wait to see how bad the next MacBook Air is when it comes out. I hope it's absolute garbage so I can go down to the Apple store and buy it 🤣
 
Apple has now fully moved into the post-Jobs era.

Design is not an operations activity. It's a strategic asset. It's product planning beyond what the finance forecasters are comfortable seeing. Product roadmaps. Looking to where technology is headed, and designing solutions before we get there.

This is really terrible news for Apple. They will be relegated to "follower" status and no longer leaders. Having no vision means you're blind to opportunity.
 
Is this a good thing? I don’t think so.
I don't know, the biggest hardware problems Apple had in recent years were when they leaned too far into design driven products where everything else took a back seat and Ives ran roughshod over usability/ergonomics and reliability. Even on the software side a lot of the UI changes that make it a flatter, less easily differentiable UI, across Apple's OSes where driven by the same problem. The new MBPs and such, like the one I'm typing this on, are the rejection of that, they still have great design but the design informs the process, it doesnt drive it, so the more industrial slightly chunkier machines fix a lot of the frustrations folks had with previous machines.

So overall I think this is a good thing. Impressive design is not the same as good engineering or UI/UX work, and the first should inform the rest, not drive the bus.
 
I loved Jony Ive’s work at his peak. Back when he held to the tenant that design is not just how it looks but how it works. That gave us the brilliance of a home button integrated with touch ID and the iPod click wheel and pinch to zoom touch screens.

But Jony Ive seemed to forget that in his later years at Apple in a quest to remove every port on every device, sacrifice everything for the sake of thinness and pursue high-end fashion to the point of prices that excluded 99% of the first world population.

There was a great statement by John Gruber years ago where he commented that billionaire Bill Gates refused to use an iPhone and that an ordinary guy like Gruber could afford to own a better smartphone than a billionaire was using.

Sure there were third parties doing gold-plated diamond-studded iPhones for insane prices, but Apple was not selling those.

Apple has always had high prices for the highest performance macs. But the first couple of years of Apple Watch Edition were just pretentious — and functionally equivalent to Apple Watch Sport. That was all Ive losing touch with the masses.

And there is a place for nearly port-less MacBook that is ultra-thin but that MacBook should never carry the “Pro” moniker — sacrificing basic functionality like a decent keyboard for the sake of thinness.

I don’t miss the Jony Ive that left Apple or the like-minded designers who have either left Apple with him or complained since his departure. I miss the Jony Ive who believed like Steve Jobs that design is about something works from the inside out.
 
I think a balance between engineering and creative would be better.

It was heavily skewed on the creative with Jony Ive at the helm. Hopefully it won’t be too engineering focussed now that Jeff Williams is running the show.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spock
I loved Jony Ive’s work at his peak. Back when he held to the tenant that design is not just how it looks but how it works. That gave us the brilliance of a home button integrated with touch ID and the iPod click wheel and pinch to zoom touch screens.

But Jony Ive seemed to forget that in his later years at Apple in a quest to remove every port on every device, sacrifice everything for the sake of thinness and pursue high-end fashion to the point of prices that excluded 99% of the first world population.

There was a great statement by John Gruber years ago where he commented that billionaire Bill Gates refused to use an iPhone and that an ordinary guy like Gruber could afford to own a better smartphone than a billionaire was using.

Sure there were third parties doing gold-plated diamond-studded iPhones for insane prices, but Apple was not selling those.

Apple has always had high prices for the highest performance macs. But the first couple of years of Apple Watch Edition were just pretentious — and functionally equivalent to Apple Watch Sport. That was all Ive losing touch with the masses.

And there is a place for nearly port-less MacBook that is ultra-thin but that MacBook should never carry the “Pro” moniker — sacrificing basic functionality like a decent keyboard for the sake of thinness.

I don’t miss the Jony Ive that left Apple or the like-minded designers who have either left Apple with him or complained since his departure. I miss the Jony Ive who believed like Steve Jobs that design is about something works from the inside out.
Ive and Jobs would often discuss design, so I assume they would both flourish and balance out each other’s ideas. Without Jobs or a similar product guy, Ive was unchecked and had more misses along some great hits.
 
You like the new iMac's chin? The MacBook Pro's notch? The Studio Display's non-user removable, but if it needs to be removed you need a special tool to do so power cord? The AirPods Max smart carrying case that looks like a bra purse?

As with Jony Ive, there have been a few questionable design decisions lately IMO.

I will say she hit it out of the park with the Polishing Cloth though. 🤣
Why, in fact, I love my iMac. It looks very sharp on my blue desk with its two tone blue and the white border.
 
Putting an Operations person in charge of a Design team is going to mean greatly stifled creativity in favour of cost savings. Don't expect to see radical new designs of things any time soon. That Mac Mini chassis has just been given another 10 years to live.
 
From an organisational point of view, it's weird that the COO will now get 20 or so new direct reports.

Perhaps though we'll see directors of Mac Product Design, iPhone product design, accessories product design etc. and he wants to work with people to see if they suit those roles.

Personally, I still think that they're paying Jonny Ive to be their head of design behind the scenes on a more consultative/product vision basis, so they might need only directors to implement Jony's vision (no disrespect to them)

Personally, I think that Apple are in a good place design wise - the new products are mostly more functional and sleek and more 'honest' as designers/architects say.
 
  • Like
Reactions: David1964
Apple has had fans that love the products for their stability and software ease of use. And Apple has fans that mainly love the beauty of apple design. I'm the former, so I'm fine with this, but I can understand why people would be worried. ...At some point the obsession with a thin iMac felt like fat shaming ot me, I'm hoping we can bring some function back even if it means being a few mm thicker on some products. With maybe the exception of the iPhone, keeping things small there is important. (Even if I'd still like a 3.5 mm jack.)
 
The Apple design team has gotten very small. I wonder if half of these people still working at Apple today?

Apple_Industrial_Design_team_2014.jpg


Only three women - amazing to say the least
 
I moved to Windows 10 and built my own PC when it first came out because Jony Ive designed Mac sucked for performance and his bull headed passion for scissor keyboard.

I have returned to Mac this year with the new designs and M2 chip. I don't know who is designing these Macs but they are doing a good enough job to win me back.
 
It's probably the right call to give broader roles to the remaining senior designers so that can have focus on doing what they know best and pass down the knowledge that they acquired all these years to a new generation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KurtWilde
Apple has had fans that love the products for their stability and software ease of use. And Apple has fans that mainly love the beauty of apple design. I'm the former, so I'm fine with this, but I can understand why people would be worried. ...At some point the obsession with a thin iMac felt like fat shaming ot me, I'm hoping we can bring some function back even if it means being a few mm thicker on some products. With maybe the exception of the iPhone, keeping things small there is important. (Even if I'd still like a 3.5 mm jack.)
Yes it’s got to a point where I’m fine with ugly just make the product powerful with incredible usability. That whole thin and beautiful era got old very very fast. I don’t want a computer as an ornament I want a computer that works well without jet engine fans. Johnny Ives needed to go sooner.
 
Apple has had fans that love the products for their stability and software ease of use. And Apple has fans that mainly love the beauty of apple design. I'm the former, so I'm fine with this, but I can understand why people would be worried. ...At some point the obsession with a thin iMac felt like fat shaming ot me, I'm hoping we can bring some function back even if it means being a few mm thicker on some products. With maybe the exception of the iPhone, keeping things small there is important. (Even if I'd still like a 3.5 mm jack.)
Agreed. Good iPhone design would mean most people not feeling that they needed to buy a case.

I.e. durability and resilience is part of the design (though whoever is running the case accessories business in Apple might beg to differ).
 
  • Like
Reactions: KurtWilde
Alan Dye staying as head of software design is a disappointment.
I predict iOS 17 calculator will get the same loving treatment he did to Books and will be just a blank white screen with operators hidden under the share button and numbers hidden under the ellipsis button.
Why is it is "a disappointment" if this guy stays? TIA for the 411.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.