Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
People who care about sound quality would never consider Apple. No. Just no. Sonos, Bose, and the king of sound: Google. Have you seen how small a HomePod is? Can’t generate good sound. Fact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FyerFyer



Apple today cut the price of HomePod on its online store by $50, with the smart speaker now listed for $299, down from $349. The price drop follows recent promotional discounts at several third-party retailers across the U.S.

homepod-on-shelf-800x579.jpg

Similar price reductions also appeared in other regions and territories on Thursday, with the price of a HomePod in the United Kingdom falling from £319 to £279, for instance.

Apple's expensive HomePod speaker accounted for just six percent of the U.S. smart speaker installed base through the fourth quarter of 2018, according to a February report.

Research firm Consumer Intelligence Research Partners estimates that the U.S. installed base of smart speakers reached 66 million units last quarter of 2018, suggesting HomePod sales in the country totaled around 3.96 million units since the speaker became available to order in January 2018. Apple does not disclose exact HomePod sales figures.

By comparison, the Amazon Echo and Google Home reportedly accounted for 70 percent and 24 percent of the installed base respectively, with both products proving to be popular holiday gifts.

In April 2018, well-connected analyst Ming-Chi Kuo said Apple was "mulling" a "low-cost version" of the HomePod, potentially due to shipments of the current version being "far below market expectations." A report out of China said the lower-cost HomePod could be priced between $150 and $200 in the United States.

Article Link: Apple Drops HomePod Price to $299, Down From $349
 
The competitions high quality speakers that are equivalent to the HomePod are all at this price or higher.

The fact this is happening means they are finally getting the point that their gaping profit margins for "R&D" just aren't realistic. They aren't subsidizing either, this is just cutting down profits, and I bet there's plenty left.

This is a $199 speaker at best, but I wouldn't pay more than $149. Plus, Alexa's integration with my home automation blows Siri and homekit away. (My Mac just changed "homekit" to "home kit", meaning Apple hasn't even taken the time to put their flagship home automation product into their standard MacOS dictionary. My mac corrects every other product I type in.)
 



Apple today cut the price of HomePod on its online store by $50, with the smart speaker now listed for $299, down from $349. The price drop follows recent promotional discounts at several third-party retailers across the U.S.

homepod-on-shelf-800x579.jpg

Similar price reductions also appeared in other regions and territories on Thursday, with the price of a HomePod in the United Kingdom falling from £319 to £279, for instance.

Apple's expensive HomePod speaker accounted for just six percent of the U.S. smart speaker installed base through the fourth quarter of 2018, according to a February report.

Research firm Consumer Intelligence Research Partners estimates that the U.S. installed base of smart speakers reached 66 million units last quarter of 2018, suggesting HomePod sales in the country totaled around 3.96 million units since the speaker became available to order in January 2018. Apple does not disclose exact HomePod sales figures.

By comparison, the Amazon Echo and Google Home reportedly accounted for 70 percent and 24 percent of the installed base respectively, with both products proving to be popular holiday gifts.

In April 2018, well-connected analyst Ming-Chi Kuo said Apple was "mulling" a "low-cost version" of the HomePod, potentially due to shipments of the current version being "far below market expectations." A report out of China said the lower-cost HomePod could be priced between $150 and $200 in the United States.

Article Link: Apple Drops HomePod Price to $299, Down From $349


I'll pass. For me, money has nothing to do with it. I don't like anything that listens and operates from voice commands. Total and complete invasion of privacy. I'm old school and would be happy with a flip phone, turntable, CD's etc. Just say NO to streaming and CLOUD for any and everything! Life was much better before all this cloud based crap existed.
 
Last edited:
So what you’re saying is besides having no clue about what high quality speakers cost, you also have absolutely zero clue what Apple does and doesn’t do with user data

$50 off? Ha, no.

I mean, I wouldn't even buy one if the price was $50 total because I don't want a spyspeaker in my house, but it would probably be fairly priced at that.

It's too bad Apple doesn't break out sales numbers for anything any more. I'm betting this bit of silliness is selling about as well as the iPod Hi-Fi, another speaker that wasn't worth anywhere close to the idiotic $350 Apple wanted for it.
 
Only if the package only contains like 6 noodles. I don’t understand some people here. You guys want lower prices, Apple lowers the price and it‘s still not enough. Weren‘t there even reports that Apple loses money with HomePod?
It's a joke. Somebody had a laugh with it. AAPL won't fall for this.
 
I've used Alexa, and I've used HomePod. Alexa has a broader range of questions she can answer fluidly, but that's not why I have my HomePods.

HomePods sound significantly better. In tandem, they sound very nice indeed, and their integration with all my Apple stuffs makes them a huge addition to my home. I have a total of four, and don't regret purchasing them at all.
 
No Spotify Connect™ nor Spotify/Siri support no buy. Sonos is where the magic is at.
 
  • Like
Reactions: heffsf
Not based on facts? You kidding right? It is universally agreed upon by the tech industry that Siri is the worst of the lot. Here are some sources.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnko...ching-up-cortana-surprises-siri-falls-behind/

https://www.theverge.com/2016/10/12/13251068/walt-mossberg-apple-siri-is-dumb

https://www.tomsguide.com/us/alexa-vs-siri-vs-google,review-4772.html

https://www.businessinsider.com/why-siri-sucks-2018-5?r=US&IR=T
(I recommend you watch from 3:00 to see how far behind Apple is).

Nope, not kidding. Siri on the HomePod isn't as advanced in terms of features, but it's not as bad as you make it out to be. Here is an example comparing all 3. It's improving and performed better than Alexa in some areas. Personally, I have really only found Siri to be lacking when it comes to asking it random trivia type questions, but I don't personally see a ton of value in that aspect. Of course, I'll welcome any improvements they bring to the HomePod.

https://www.macrumors.com/2018/12/20/siri-on-homepod-vs-alexa-google-cortana/

homepod-loup-ventures-test.jpg


loup-ventures-smart-speaker-test-1.jpg

loup-ventures-by-category.jpg
 
Last edited:
No. Apple's margins have remained remarkably consistent. When they can reduce prices - they do, but they won't compromise on sustainability.

We've seen older products being sold for the same price in 2018/19 ( for example ) as they were being sold for 5 years ago, yet, component prices had been reduced.

edited.
 
  • Like
Reactions: heffsf and trifid
HomePod needs to be $249, get a software update so that developers have a SiriKit API to build for, and get an digital optical out. That would be a great product
 
  • Like
Reactions: wwooden and trifid
Not based on facts? You kidding right? It is universally agreed upon by the tech industry that Siri is the worst of the lot. Here are some sources.

These kinds of "everyone universally agrees" statements are always suspect, but it's been used countless times against Apple despite their continued success. I honestly cannot think of a product Apple has put out that hasn't been subjected to that "everyone hates it/agrees it sucks" argument. And what's even more curious is that it has a protesting-too-much feel to it, as if everyone knows Apple tends to do these things best and everyone has to rush in to tear it down to defend their choice of Alexa/Google/etc.

I think the most amusing and the most vitriolic example was the introduction of the iPod. There's an infamous Slashdot forum discussion out there somewhere that has been archived showing almost across the board negative, snotty and sneering reactions to the product from so many in the "tech industry" who were absolutely convinced it was a ridiculous folly on the part of Apple and would crash and burn because it failed in so many ways. And that went on for years, with people constantly talking about the mythical "iPod killer" that never arrived.

This kind opinion is meaningless, no matter how many people share it or convince each other of its validity.

For the most part, I find Siri perfectly workable for my needs. I have gripes of course. I welcome improvements, but the concept of controlling a tech device via voice commands is still in its infancy and demanding perfection or some kind of all-knowing HAL 9000-like AI is ridiculous to begin with.
 
Last edited:
I love my HomePod, great for music and pretty decent for watching movies -- I want to [ick up a second one but am thinking they could have a 2nd gen coming since they dropping prices of gen1?
 
When I'm in the same room with my Echo I'm either giving it a command "Alexa, <radio program>", "Alexa, play <something on Amazon Music>", "Alexa, notifications", "Alexa, volume <up, down>", "Alexa, off", etc., or I'm just listening to it while on my computer (like right now). I'm not talking or discussing anything of importance, usually not talking at all. If I am talking about stuff of a private nature I'm generally not using the Echo, so I just unplug it. If I just want to listen for a purely music experience I play a stream through good wired speaker(s) or headphones via nice DAC hardware, either dedicated or through (currently) my LG V40 phone. I haven't actually heard the Apple smart speaker, and have heard it has superior sound for a non-wired device. I'm not sure, given the problems with Siri, that its sound would be good enough to justify the cost, even with the $50 reduction. My Echo 2nd Gen, at $139 when purchased, was a good buy for the price.

What room do you have it in that you don’t talk? People around here talk in every room including the bathrooms, closets, and basement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cesar Battistini
I wanted a Homepod but ended up buying a set of Klipsch speakers roughly a month before it finally got a release date. Still kinda annoyed about that.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.