Why so many people on this site want Spotify integration is beyond me.no spotify = no homepod for me
Apple today cut the price of HomePod on its online store by $50, with the smart speaker now listed for $299, down from $349. The price drop follows recent promotional discounts at several third-party retailers across the U.S.
![]()
Similar price reductions also appeared in other regions and territories on Thursday, with the price of a HomePod in the United Kingdom falling from £319 to £279, for instance.
Apple's expensive HomePod speaker accounted for just six percent of the U.S. smart speaker installed base through the fourth quarter of 2018, according to a February report.
Research firm Consumer Intelligence Research Partners estimates that the U.S. installed base of smart speakers reached 66 million units last quarter of 2018, suggesting HomePod sales in the country totaled around 3.96 million units since the speaker became available to order in January 2018. Apple does not disclose exact HomePod sales figures.
By comparison, the Amazon Echo and Google Home reportedly accounted for 70 percent and 24 percent of the installed base respectively, with both products proving to be popular holiday gifts.
In April 2018, well-connected analyst Ming-Chi Kuo said Apple was "mulling" a "low-cost version" of the HomePod, potentially due to shipments of the current version being "far below market expectations." A report out of China said the lower-cost HomePod could be priced between $150 and $200 in the United States.
Article Link: Apple Drops HomePod Price to $299, Down From $349
The fact this is happening means they are finally getting the point that their gaping profit margins for "R&D" just aren't realistic. They aren't subsidizing either, this is just cutting down profits, and I bet there's plenty left.
This is a $199 speaker at best, but I wouldn't pay more than $149. Plus, Alexa's integration with my home automation blows Siri and homekit away. (My Mac just changed "homekit" to "home kit", meaning Apple hasn't even taken the time to put their flagship home automation product into their standard MacOS dictionary. My mac corrects every other product I type in.)
Apple today cut the price of HomePod on its online store by $50, with the smart speaker now listed for $299, down from $349. The price drop follows recent promotional discounts at several third-party retailers across the U.S.
![]()
Similar price reductions also appeared in other regions and territories on Thursday, with the price of a HomePod in the United Kingdom falling from £319 to £279, for instance.
Apple's expensive HomePod speaker accounted for just six percent of the U.S. smart speaker installed base through the fourth quarter of 2018, according to a February report.
Research firm Consumer Intelligence Research Partners estimates that the U.S. installed base of smart speakers reached 66 million units last quarter of 2018, suggesting HomePod sales in the country totaled around 3.96 million units since the speaker became available to order in January 2018. Apple does not disclose exact HomePod sales figures.
By comparison, the Amazon Echo and Google Home reportedly accounted for 70 percent and 24 percent of the installed base respectively, with both products proving to be popular holiday gifts.
In April 2018, well-connected analyst Ming-Chi Kuo said Apple was "mulling" a "low-cost version" of the HomePod, potentially due to shipments of the current version being "far below market expectations." A report out of China said the lower-cost HomePod could be priced between $150 and $200 in the United States.
Article Link: Apple Drops HomePod Price to $299, Down From $349
So what you're telling me is you never used one. Got it!People who care about sound quality would never consider Apple. No. Just no. Sonos, Bose, and the king of sound: Google. Have you seen how small a HomePod is? Can’t generate good sound. Fact.
I will wait until it shows up at Marshall's, TJ Maxx or Ross!$50 more to go and then I’d buy one when it’s on sale for $199
$50 off? Ha, no.
I mean, I wouldn't even buy one if the price was $50 total because I don't want a spyspeaker in my house, but it would probably be fairly priced at that.
It's too bad Apple doesn't break out sales numbers for anything any more. I'm betting this bit of silliness is selling about as well as the iPod Hi-Fi, another speaker that wasn't worth anywhere close to the idiotic $350 Apple wanted for it.
It's a joke. Somebody had a laugh with it. AAPL won't fall for this.Only if the package only contains like 6 noodles. I don’t understand some people here. You guys want lower prices, Apple lowers the price and it‘s still not enough. Weren‘t there even reports that Apple loses money with HomePod?
Not based on facts? You kidding right? It is universally agreed upon by the tech industry that Siri is the worst of the lot. Here are some sources.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnko...ching-up-cortana-surprises-siri-falls-behind/
https://www.theverge.com/2016/10/12/13251068/walt-mossberg-apple-siri-is-dumb
https://www.tomsguide.com/us/alexa-vs-siri-vs-google,review-4772.html
https://www.businessinsider.com/why-siri-sucks-2018-5?r=US&IR=T
(I recommend you watch from 3:00 to see how far behind Apple is).
No. Apple's margins have remained remarkably consistent. When they can reduce prices - they do, but they won't compromise on sustainability.
Hey Siri, 22% more base.Still no thanks, unless they start to include a control knob to adjust the bass
Hey Siri, 22% more base.
I prefer knobs for quick adjustments.
Both methods are a must in today’s world.
Not based on facts? You kidding right? It is universally agreed upon by the tech industry that Siri is the worst of the lot. Here are some sources.
Used more as a phone assys. Not desktop. That's a phone culture item. As is the watch. My point stands.Fringe accessory sales? Have you ever heard of AirPods?
The sound quality in this is superior than sonos offering.Still too pricey. I don't care about the "smart" part, only the music, but maybe I'd be better off with something from Sonos
Airpods are used with every apple product seamlessly that's the biggest selling point.Used more as a phone assys. Not desktop. That's a phone culture item. As is the watch. My point stands.
When I'm in the same room with my Echo I'm either giving it a command "Alexa, <radio program>", "Alexa, play <something on Amazon Music>", "Alexa, notifications", "Alexa, volume <up, down>", "Alexa, off", etc., or I'm just listening to it while on my computer (like right now). I'm not talking or discussing anything of importance, usually not talking at all. If I am talking about stuff of a private nature I'm generally not using the Echo, so I just unplug it. If I just want to listen for a purely music experience I play a stream through good wired speaker(s) or headphones via nice DAC hardware, either dedicated or through (currently) my LG V40 phone. I haven't actually heard the Apple smart speaker, and have heard it has superior sound for a non-wired device. I'm not sure, given the problems with Siri, that its sound would be good enough to justify the cost, even with the $50 reduction. My Echo 2nd Gen, at $139 when purchased, was a good buy for the price.