Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
People thinking this is some sort of bad news should know one thing or two when it comes how to run a company.

  • You start with a business case. You include reasons, why is it important (What/So what/Now what) forecasted profit and loss analysis etc. You state your needed resources and how much time it'll take to keep the project up and running as well as how much the return of investment will be.
  • In technologies like displays, modems etc - there are ample amount of players in the game that do these as their core business. Apple is developing these so they can invest now and reap the benefits later where every component would be returning better margins (profit) for every product sold. (Apple's average margin is around 70% which is unheard of in tech industry)
  • So Apple is reassessing the developments, the delays and challenges in each project and deciding to kill some because they now KNOW (not believe) that continued efforts will either not come to fruition or would be much more expensive than they thought.
  • So all these cancellations are just refocusing resources where it would benefit the most to the company. Apple may think of redeveloping MicroLED displays in the future when the science is better positioned for commercialisation.
Cook can ben interpreted as uninfluential.

But he's a master of operations and he knows a thing or two when running the company (commercially)
Well, you just make too much sense …
And for clarification: I am NOT sarcastic.
A lot of posters here have no clue how a tech company works…
 
People thinking this is some sort of bad news should know one thing or two when it comes how to run a company.

  • You start with a business case. You include reasons, why is it important (What/So what/Now what) forecasted profit and loss analysis etc. You state your needed resources and how much time it'll take to keep the project up and running as well as how much the return of investment will be.
  • In technologies like displays, modems etc - there are ample amount of players in the game that do these as their core business. Apple is developing these so they can invest now and reap the benefits later where every component would be returning better margins (profit) for every product sold. (Apple's average margin is around 70% which is unheard of in tech industry)
  • So Apple is reassessing the developments, the delays and challenges in each project and deciding to kill some because they now KNOW (not believe) that continued efforts will either not come to fruition or would be much more expensive than they thought.
  • So all these cancellations are just refocusing resources where it would benefit the most to the company. Apple may think of redeveloping MicroLED displays in the future when the science is better positioned for commercialisation.
Cook can ben interpreted as uninfluential.

But he's a master of operations and he knows a thing or two when running the company (commercially)
And all this is based on rumors. We have no real way to know if Apple is/was working on these things. Nor do we know if they have been canceled.
 
Thats just how R&D works.

In most of the cases you fail and if you do, you reallocate those resources to other projects or you cut them partially or even entirely. Happens all the time.
Not only that, this was all rumors to begin with and Apple is working on another 25 ( or make up your own number) projects that we have not heard about, and some of them will succeed while some won’t…
 
Although this may not look good I don't look at it as necessarily a bad thing.

A lot of these cancelled projects showed a lot of hubris. This doesn't happen only with Apple but still sometimes you need to acknowledge there are limits on some things so you can go beyond in other areas were you excel.
 
Apple cancelling products outside of their "core competency" is probably a good thing, frankly. Apple has had great success partnering with and sourcing components from companies where this technology is their "core competency". I get Apple wants more control over (and profits from) the supply chain by doing it themselves, but they are not really organized to be doing dozens or scores of things at the same time.

MicroLED is still a technology very much in early development. Commercial applications are limited and orders of magnitude more expensive than OLED or MiniLED alternatives. But when it is finally a commercially-viable technology, Apple will partner with those companies and they will improve their product by meeting Apple's demand. Just as Samsung improved the quality of their OLED smartphone displays to meet Apple's requirements. Or like how TSMC improved the yields and performance efficiency of their fabs to meet Apple's requirements. And how Qualcomm is likely improving their cellular modems to increase the "barrier to entry" for Apple if they do go their own way.
 
Can't build AirPower, can't build a car, can't build MicroLED. What is going on with this company?
They do rely on other companies to manufacture products… Apple themselves probably have only limited manufacturing of some prototypes… even then a-lot of individual components and component assemblies will be outsourced.

So you're right, technically 😂
 
I think it may ultimately be good that Tim Cook’s failed projects that would have added little to product differentiation have been acknowledged as a waste of time and innovation resources. We need product innovation.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Dj64Mk7
Apple is slowly becoming a nightmare. The Apple that once was, no longer exists.

I'm 100% convinced that every product Apple releases from this point, will be trash.
They are pretty much doing the sane stuff they have done for the past 30 plus years… They are still making the same general approach… they are never usually first with new tech… they always jump in when they have it, mostly, right.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.