TBH, they should give them away for free to Apple employees. Didn't Apple give every employee a free iPhone a few years back?
company had a smaller number of employees prolly
TBH, they should give them away for free to Apple employees. Didn't Apple give every employee a free iPhone a few years back?
While what you're saying makes perfect sense, you have to realize the company that is selling these watches. This isn't some startup company that needs to prove their relevance. Apple's reputation of quality products brings customers to their door. Would you charge more if you knew people would pay for it?
What are you talking about. LmaoWell then Android Wear devices must be really overpriced since Google was giving them away to developrs at last years I/O conference.![]()
Complex business or not, Apple knows they could cut the price of their hardware down to a more reasonable and honest price and still be one of the richest companies in the world.
Their executives would still make millions of dollars a year. All their stores would remain open. No jobs would be cut. And all their lights would stay on.
My problem with them is they know they don't have to, so they don't.
Yes, yes, yes. But what about those who don't want one? Will they face passive intimidation to purchase?![]()
So Apple can't charge for 'the cost of doing business'? What? All that overhead costs money - it can't just be ignored, or you won't make any money.
Oh, I guess your version of business costs is used by all the android manufacturers, that's why they don't make money
So basically, you have a problem with every successful company in the world? You could say the same about Microsoft, Google, Samsung, Exxon, Chevron, Comcast, Disney, etc.
Apple's success is in large part due to their very reasonable and honest prices.
You won't find too many products that offer Apple's level of quality, features and support for the same or better price.
Can't wait to work at the Apple Store and then quit.
TBH, they should give them away for free to Apple employees. Didn't Apple give every employee a free iPhone a few years back?
This only proves how HIGH a markup consumers are paying for an Apple Watch.
While there is demand, they are happy to sell them like hot cakes.
The consumer is the problem here cause they will pay those prices.
I don't mind the prices they set. What annoys me is when a currency fluctuates against the dollar, and apple does not reflect it when the dollar is weak, but as soon as the dollar is high, they raise their prices straight away, that for me is profiteering.
Probationary period. Any smart HR Department would refuse allowing you any such benefits until you've been with the company for 60-90 days in good standing.
Join the company, loot the benefits, and then immediately quit .. that tactic maybe worked back in the 1980s.
I'm sure Apple is still making a lot of profit. Would guess 100% markup still. Easily.
I think the Watch is definitely worth the $350-400 starting price. The iPod was $399 in 2001 and people thought it was too high. Guess what? People voted with their wallets and we know how that turned out. The watch will be no different.
100% markup is the same thing as 50% off.. (btw)
More like 25%
Personally, I'd be happy if they'd focus more on better software, better computers, better iPhones and iPads for a while, instead of trying to sell us new useless toys.
Which one are you getting? You seem so passionate about it, that I guess you will spare nothing to get one, right?
Cheers!
I'm amazed at how many people on this form don't realize this is a marketing strategy.
The "masses" know that the cost on contract is just the cashdown on their loan. Many people know exactly what they're getting. In the case of T-mobile, the load aspect is made explicit. I believe everyone heading towards that.
.
Complex business or not, Apple knows they could cut the price of their hardware down to a more reasonable and honest price and still be one of the richest companies in the world.
Their executives would still make millions of dollars a year. All their stores would remain open. No jobs would be cut. And all their lights would stay on.
My problem with them is they know they don't have to, so they don't.