Goldman Sachs was doomed because they have no idea how to deal with regular consumers that might have credit ratings of 650 to 780. Normally they deal with consumers at 780 and above.
💯At least I have a lovely titanium card keepsake that I can use as a bookmark. 😁
Goldman Sachs is printed on the rear of the physical card.
Not a money loser at all, just not sufficiently profitable for them. Greed strikes again.That’s not surprising. It was a money loser for Goldman Sachs.
Not a money loser at all, just not sufficiently profitable for them. Greed strikes again.
Goldman Sachs was doomed because they have no idea how to deal with regular consumers that might have credit ratings of 650 to 780. Normally they deal with consumers at 780 and above.
Some call it greed. Others call it capitalism. In this case, GS has better uses, and greater projected returns, for its capital.Not a money loser at all, just not sufficiently profitable for them. Greed strikes again.
My bank is Capital One. I’m moving my savings there. They have a performance savings account that currently has 4.3% interest.So my 1st high yield savings was Marcus Goldman Sachs. I moved a good chunk over when apple offered theirs. I did move majority back when Marcus increased the interest and Apple didn’t seem to be heading towards raising theirs anytime soon. Guess we know why now. But if this news means that’ll be closed. Which bank has a less volatile service for high yield savings? I don’t want to keep playing musical chairs with my pittance of savings.
Or if you move it to Fidelity then SPAXX yield is 4.99%My bank is Capital One. I’m moving my savings there. They have a performance savings account that currently has 4.3% interest.
Is that a liquid savings account?Or if you move it to Fidelity then SPAXX yield is 4.99%
As terrible as Apple might or might not be, they’re not even in the same league Goldman Sacks.This is good! TBH, Everyone should be super careful when dealing with such a company like Apple and their shady business practices. They exploit people and then try to skew the facts by saying "Hey.. It's designed here in California"
Yeah you can even use bill pay from it.Is that a liquid savings account?
I have several credit cards not issued or associated with Apple that are in my wallet and can be used the same way for payments. If you mean how the Apple card shows transactions and allows payments, that is the kind of integration they would only get with their own card. Other issuers aren’t going to share that data.Synchrony, please no.
It would be nice if Apple expanded the Apple Card interface to other card issuers (not using their specific app and having multiple apps), directly in the Wallet interface similar to how Apple Card shows.
Hmm…my 401K and employee stock purchase is with Fidelity. May have to check it out.Yeah you can even use bill pay from it.
Some uk cards can be managed through the wallet app much like the Apple Card is.I'm in the U.S. and all my bank cards – from various institutions – are in Apple Wallet. I've also had work expense account, Health Care FSA, and bank debit cards in the wallet. What is it about the U.S. that is holding back?
Don’t you use it with other cards? I’ve got several non-Apple cards in my Wallet that I use regularly.Apple Pay will be worthless!
I’m thinking, Apple Card Pro!March 2025:
Introducing Apple Card 2.0
*Current cardholders automatically migrated.*
If the reports are to be believed, GS wanted out because they weren’t making any money out of this partnership. This to me, is more of a damning indictment of the shenanigans that other credit card companies do (like selling your personal data), rather than any failure on Apple’s part.
But instead, I see derision and scorn being poured on Apple for daring to negotiate terms with a credit card provider that are actually in the best interests of the user.