Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Goldman Sachs was doomed because they have no idea how to deal with regular consumers that might have credit ratings of 650 to 780. Normally they deal with consumers at 780 and above.
 
  • Like
Reactions: redfirebird08
Goldman Sachs is printed on the rear of the physical card.

And on any other credit card in the world, the issuing bank is on the front of the card. Even the Costco Citi card that I've seen mentioned on this thread, actually doesn't have Costco's name anywhere on the front but Citi's logo is on there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: msackey
So my 1st high yield savings was Marcus Goldman Sachs. I moved a good chunk over when apple offered theirs. I did move majority back when Marcus increased the interest and Apple didn’t seem to be heading towards raising theirs anytime soon. Guess we know why now. But if this news means that’ll be closed. Which bank has a less volatile service for high yield savings? I don’t want to keep playing musical chairs with my pittance of savings.
My bank is Capital One. I’m moving my savings there. They have a performance savings account that currently has 4.3% interest.
 
This is good! TBH, Everyone should be super careful when dealing with such a company like Apple and their shady business practices. They exploit people and then try to skew the facts by saying "Hey.. It's designed here in California"
 
"Apple and Goldman Sachs are focused on providing an incredible experience for our customers to help them lead healthier financial lives. The award-winning Apple Card has seen a great reception from consumers, and we will continue to innovate and deliver the best tools and services for them."

What an absolute piece of garbage PR fluff.
 
So basically put, because Goldman Sachs can't screw over the customer financially due to the consumer-first policies Apple established with GS when the partnership was struck – they want out of the deal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deruch and Chuckeee
This is just not a good year for the credit cards I use. If I am using tap pay/Apple pay I'm using Apple Card. If I am at Costco or doing anything that requires a card on file, I am using my X1 card. Looks like both are up in the air next year.

I am honestly annoyed. There aren't great cards for what I want.

I needed a Visa for Costco. I also wanted virtual cards. Virtual cards suck for card companies but are great for end users. I have about 30 Virtual Cards with X1. My gym (each location), car wash, paypal, amazon, uber, lawn care, etc all have their own card. I can generate one time use cards for online stuff and I can easily in the app see how much I've spent with each vendor.

You only deal with fraud so much before you go this route. I got hit twice in one year with my bank card and each time it was a royal pain to change my card everywhere it needed to be changed. The second time around spent a week updating the card everywhere and then that weekend bam hit again. Bank suggested maybe a place where I had to give the number over the phone hit me. That was the end of using my bank card and getting a X1 Card. I tell each entity this is a virtual card just for this business. Funny how since then I haven't had a issue anywhere with fraud.

Everyone is always about the points and cash back and blah blah. Nah don't care I want to be able to spend my money in a secure fashion. I don't want to deal with updating my card all over the place when someone compromises it. I also like having a proper app that tracks everything with easy payments something most banks are incapable of accomplishing.

Every alternative I look at has virtual cards as a afterthought. You need to be at a computer to create one or the virtual card has a bunch of restrictions or one time use. Nope. Virtual Card and if my gym/delta/lawn guy screws around bam your card is cancelled and you're not inconveniencing me.
 
I bet apple just does it themselves. they likely need to get into banking anyway if they wanna expand financing options
 
Synchrony, please no.

It would be nice if Apple expanded the Apple Card interface to other card issuers (not using their specific app and having multiple apps), directly in the Wallet interface similar to how Apple Card shows.
I have several credit cards not issued or associated with Apple that are in my wallet and can be used the same way for payments. If you mean how the Apple card shows transactions and allows payments, that is the kind of integration they would only get with their own card. Other issuers aren’t going to share that data.
 
I'm in the U.S. and all my bank cards – from various institutions – are in Apple Wallet. I've also had work expense account, Health Care FSA, and bank debit cards in the wallet. What is it about the U.S. that is holding back?
Some uk cards can be managed through the wallet app much like the Apple Card is.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: msackey
If the reports are to be believed, GS wanted out because they weren’t making any money out of this partnership. This to me, is more of a damning indictment of the shenanigans that other credit card companies do (like selling your personal data), rather than any failure on Apple’s part.

I think it had more to do with this:

Goldman Sachs was new to consumer banking when the Apple Card launched, and to establish a deal with Apple, it is not collecting fees that many credit card issuers receive. The bank does not get a cut of the fee that merchants pay to Apple to accept the Apple Card, nor is it able to collect annual fees, late fees, or foreign transaction fees.



But instead, I see derision and scorn being poured on Apple for daring to negotiate terms with a credit card provider that are actually in the best interests of the user.

Based on the above, it looks more like Apple negotiated terms that were in the best interest of Apple.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.