Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
With Apple, both the OS and the hardware must meet our needs.

So his choices are either macOS with hardware that doesn't meet his needs, or the hardware he wants with Microsoft Windows... That's not much of a choice, is it?

There is still a choice that needs to be made. Pick hardware/software aspects that are most important to you and make a decision. If Apple's hardware doesn't meet his (or anyone's) needs, whether it's CPU speed or color of the case, purchase hardware from someone else.

Life is full of trades and compromises. Make a choice and move forward. Or stand still, stuck in the mud, not doing what needs to be done. Billions of adults get through life everyday making the tough decisions.

I would love to have a pony. But the zoning ordinances in the city I live in won't allow me to have a pony. I could move to a more rural location out in the country, with more land, and then have a pony. But I like urban environments better. So I made a choice preferring to live in an urban environment over having a pony.
 
Last edited:
I will never buy a fully autonomous vehicle. Yes, I said never ... they want there to be no accelerators, no steering, no brake pedals, no human control over the vehicle at all.

It's funny, but right now I wouldn't even own a modern car. I like my cranky old Alfa Romeo and its sophisticated system of about 8 wires, tying the ignition to 3 or 4 spark plugs (depending on its mood). You hand crank the windows where you want em before you start driving and live with it. It doesn't even have a radio, nor should it, because the sound of it on the road is it's own music. It's the most fun, unreliable, gutless, yet speedy, and probably dangerous car I've ever driven, and I'm certain I'll meet my death in it eventually. But the thought of a car you can't completely disassemble and reassemble with a crescent wrench and mallet gives me the shakes. I don't want computers anywhere near my car.

That said, when I envision what will replace the individual carriage a few centuries from now, it's driving your electric up onto a network of track, being carried in a mag-lev configuration at extremely high-speed to your destination by simple voice commands, & at your preferred distance from other vehicles, but with route and speed controlled by the central transit coordination software via the tracks own data network. The wide, multi-lane tracks induction-charge your batteries en route, following your local communications point along with you, & tightly coordinated traffic flows at hundreds of miles per hour, with intersecting routes at distances to avoid aerodynamic turbulence, and steady accelerations & decelerations timed to provide a smooth, imperceptible gradient over your trip distance. As the car exits that highway, the autopilot takes you to the end of the pavement, where you arrive at the dirt road or trailhead with batteries charged and full manual control.

I built models of this system as a little kid. The US lacks the vision & will to try big things these days, so major change certainly won't happen in our lifetimes, but I think the automated vehicle fits in to the big inevitable picture, and is a small enough part of the whole that private industry can tackle it in the mean time. Perhaps in a rebuilding era, some time after large-scale nuclear destruction, when a foreign nation steps in in a rebuilding effort, the US will have a more ideal opportunity to design its transportation plan from top to bottom with modern technology, rather than twenty legacy systems stemming back from the horse & buggy.
 
Last edited:
Self driving cars: check. They’re already safer than ordinary car travel.

VR: check. It works great but has zero uses and makes people sick and isolated.

A combination like a VR rollercoaster: Pure Vomit

Trying to allievate sickness with VR: pure vomit with extra UX and UI issues all rolled into isolated, dangerous car travel. Curtailed by most car journeys being short and without passengers able to use the system.

Why is Apple wasting people and money on this patent?
 
Those patent digrams are highly reminiscent of the motorized chairs the humans in Wall-e use. Apple wants to make the human race permanently sedentary.

aaa+--+wall+e+1.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lesser Evets
Experts keep assuring us that these self-driving cars will actually be flying in a few years. Bring your barf bags!
 
Last edited:
If you could press a button and produce everything produced today with machines, it would be a good thing.
What will you do once you've been replaced by a machine, tho? It's not like we'll get paid to do nothing, we'll have all the free time in the world but not the means to ride in an autonomous car (which aren't going to be free, me thinks).
 
With Apple, both the OS and the hardware must meet our needs.

So his choices are either macOS with hardware that doesn't meet his needs, or the hardware he wants with Microsoft Windows... That's not much of a choice, is it?

The choice is, purchase Apple products, or purchase alternative products that better fit your needs.

Apples products aren't a pick and choose buffet. They never have been. If you're a long time power user who remembers the "golden age" of Mac, then I imagine you should be well aware of this. Apple has always built fully integrated systems.

Either Apples current products, which are a package of software and hardware integration, meet your needs enough to warrant purchase, or they don't and a competitive product would be better suited.

Saying Macs are still better compared to competitors products, BUT I DEMAND THEM TO BE EVEN BETTER AND MORE INNOVATIVE, FOCUS ONLY ON MAC INNOVATIONS OR ELSE THAT PROVES APPLE DOESN'T CARE ABOUT ME AND THE MAC is just unbelievably self-centered and bratty.
 
Self driving cars: check. They’re already safer than ordinary car travel.

VR: check. It works great but has zero uses and makes people sick and isolated.

A combination like a VR rollercoaster: Pure Vomit

Trying to allievate sickness with VR: pure vomit with extra UX and UI issues all rolled into isolated, dangerous car travel. Curtailed by most car journeys being short and without passengers able to use the system.

Why is Apple wasting people and money on this patent?

Why are wasting your breath with this nonsense, go back to the drawing board and write up a better rant.
 
Richard Hendricks already created the algorithm that solves this, just get Gilfoyle and Dinesh to integrate this Apple.

;)
 
Seems to be obvious. The problem existed long before self driving cars. Take an inside cabin on a cruise ship. What you want is just a TV screen that shows an outside view adjusted to the ships movement to keep people from being seasick.
 
Why would a self-driving car have a special need for motion sickness relief? Are the issues any different from those of a passenger in a taxi, for example?

Because there will often only be a single person inside, getting very, very bored. If they’re unable to even look at a book without getting sick, VR may be able to provide a solution, where the book can be read without losing sight of the motion of the world around them.
[doublepost=1530088527][/doublepost]
People want a good Mac, not a convoluted VR system for a car that is 4-6 years away from being announced yet alone released (given the delays in Apple products recently) -- nobody is asking for this!

Nobody was asking for the iPhone 4-6 years before it arrived.
 
Two doubled up white elephants in a row there. Neither going anywhere. May as well spend it on a 3D TV. Or one of those AI Home Robots that will clean your house when you're out Or a Jetsons rocket car. Personally. I'm saving up for a ticket to the promised space community on Mars I know this will all happen because I was told exactly the same thing 50 years ago. And what's more it was in a book so it must be true. Mmmmm. VR headsets. Mmmmm self driving cars. Meantime Mark, can you keep working on your project. We will be back in a year to see how you're getting on. For now though, pass me that 3D TV catalogue will you? 3D films and TVs are gonna be big! I know I read it in a book.
 
Last edited:
„Anti motion-sickness“ is where the dash belongs. Not „Anti-motion sickness“ although it does sound cool.
 
.... so we give up control of the vehicle to AI, then ensconce ourselves in VR via AI to avoid sickness, then wait for AI to do everything for us...

Why not just invent RENT-A-BOD-BOTS so the physical can stay home in an AI cage/shell and instantly transport anywhere via communications, and a person can live anywhere on earth at anytime via a robotic shell that provides long-distance VR info?

DUNE's ideology will come into play soon after, when people realize they are being automated out of existence.
 
I get motion sick in cars AND from VR headsets so I can't help but imagining something like this making me twice as sick.

Yo dawg we heard you had motion sickness so we put motion sickness in your motion sickness...
 
Finally, something to keep me entertained while my vehicle runs over small dogs and the random pedestrian.
 
People want a good Mac, not a convoluted VR system for a car that is 4-6 years away from being announced yet alone released (given the delays in Apple products recently) -- nobody is asking for this! I'm sick of hearing the "Not all of the engineers are working on the car/iphone/ipad/homepod/etc." argument, I used to say that to people on here but now I'm beginning to sympathize with the supposed 'haters.' They were never haters at all! Just power users! Clearly the 'not all engineers' argument can't be the case when you look at the current state of the Mac, or the mind-blowing delays in their products (AirPower being released a year+ from announcement? Seriously?). Now we're hearing Ive's team had the balls to consider removing all ports from the iPhone... it's only a matter of time before the MacBook Pro will meet the same fate of being completely port-less, save for a single charge port. Removing all the ports from the iPhone serves no true function and doesn't improve anyone's life, Ive, it just satisfies your aesthetic itch.

Reclaim your title as the leader in professional workstations, Apple, it's what many of us are waiting to give you thousands of dollars for. It's worthless having "a virtual reality system for cutting down on motion sickness [to] aid in productivity" for your car if the passengers don't have a power-user OS in the first place to utilize it. It seems true innovation is dead at Apple. Imagine the state of MacOS if there was a genuine focus on how to make an operating system for power users in this era, something truly groundbreaking and ballsy, instead we're still using the same fundamental OS design from 2 decades ago -- oh, sorry, we have dark mode now! what a relief!

When the day comes where the "courage" necessary to remove the headphone jack on the iPhone is applied to taking risks for power users, that's the day I will weep with true joy.
Why are you complaining about something that is rumored to be coming out 4-6 years from now? Apple is working on this and much more behind the scenes. They have and will continue to grow as a company so it's impossible for them to fit their entire catalog of products onto one table. Face it, your favorite indy band has a grown by a billion new fans overnight. Are you going to trash their new music just because those new fans like it? They are not going back to the way it was.
 
We're getting closer!
top-chairs-for-fat-people-with-wall-e-fat-people-22.jpg

Honestly, it's going to be a tough transition if these vehicles become commonplace and later mandatory in my lifetime (50 years, give or take lol). I enjoy driving. If I'm a passenger, I'm usually alert, not sleeping or looking at my phone. I want to be an extra set of eyes for the driver or at least see my impending doom if there's a crash coming :D.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thatrabidhobo
Apple can't even make a keyboard that survives more than 6 months or a battery that survives more than 2 years. Are we really going to trust them to make a car?
 
So far we’ve had a couple of fatalities in experimental self-driving cars. Compared to the yearly total of deaths caused by human drivers it’s insignificant. But the news media has sensationalized these deaths and continues to beat the dead horse at every opportunity. The general public is already leery of technology in general and the constant reporting of even minor accidents involving the technology is turning the public against it. I’m sure the insurance industry has its actuaries working overtime to figure out the implications of these vehicles. Personal injury lawyers are salivating at the possibility of suing Apple, Google, Tesla, and any other big pocket company who dares to build these automobiles, or supply the software that runs them. I may be wrong but I suspect this technology will never be deployed to the general population. Instead I believe it will be limited to industrial applications like moving parts around in a factory or other internal uses. The very idea of A.I. interacting with real human beings at 45-to70mph is scary. Don’t ever mess with an 80 year old blue hair in her Buick. You’ll lose every time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sman789
LOL... do you remember when you used to get into the car and just drive it?

What about when the girl on your side wants to "hold your hand"?

All these technologies are rendering people useless. It reminds me the intro of the movie Idiocracy, human evolution used to reward the smartest but there was a point that everything started to be so easy that people became lazy and evolution stop rewarding intelligence but instead started to reward fertility.

We are already well past that point. My guess would be some time in the 1700's we hit that point technologically.
 
human evolution used to reward the smartest
The only thing evolution rewards is successfully reproduction. Relative intelligence between humans really hasn't been factor there. And history is full of individuals helping to improve the reproductive odds of others. Especially in our understanding of agricultural (more reliable food) and medicine (more likely to get to breeding age and more children living). One human being "smarter" than another human isn't a statically significant selection pressure.

The only thing that would curb that is people too dumb to take advantage of that knowledge and actively undermine it (anti-vaxxers deliberately degrading herd immunity).
 
Last edited:
What is with all the judgmental hate on developing technology that can help people?

I got a little excited reading this article and it’s potential for me. Those who have to deal with severe motion sickness, like myself, also suffer from severe migraines that goes along with it. If you start to get one of those, you get the other.

I can’t ride taxi, bus, Uber, and definately not boats. Sometime planes are manageable with a large dose of meclizine but that only slows down the inevitable.

So something that allows me to travel by car where I don’t have to be in absolute control of vehicle movement? Yes, I’d like that.
[doublepost=1530111861][/doublepost]
Seems to be obvious. The problem existed long before self driving cars. Take an inside cabin on a cruise ship. What you want is just a TV screen that shows an outside view adjusted to the ships movement to keep people from being seasick.

That helps most people’s basic motion sickness but that doesn’t help those who are much more sensitive to the motion itself. I could never be on a boat in an ocean, no matter the visual cue trickery.
 
Last edited:
What will you do once you've been replaced by a machine, tho? It's not like we'll get paid to do nothing, we'll have all the free time in the world but not the means to ride in an autonomous car (which aren't going to be free, me thinks).
That’s the point. You’ll do other stuff like we have throughout history.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.