Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I have a 2020 LG TV which has the Apple TV+ app along with every streaming app I can think of and AirPlay 2 for streaming my music to the attached speakers.

There is only one benefit to Apple TV in this scenario I can think of and that is Spatial Audio support.

Might even get it for this reason as I do watch most content with my AirPods Pro. Sucks about the pricing though, I’ll get the cheapest second hand I can find.

I would really want to have a TV that is made by Apple and runs their software. WebOS is fine, but support is going to be short and the UI could use some improvements. It probably will never happen though.
 
The entire Roku line isn’t comparable to the Apple TV. It’s slower, filled with ads, and doesn’t do many of if not most of the things the Apple TV does.
Looks like iOS vs Android. Does the same things but with ads and the other crap that comes with buying the knockoff instead of the name brand. Lots of people don't care, and they're totally alternatives to each other. In fact the Roku used to do more than the ATV, like play Amazon Prime Video.
 
Looks like iOS vs Android. Does the same things but with ads and the other crap that comes with buying the knockoff instead of the name brand. Lots of people don't care, and they're totally alternatives to each other. In fact the Roku used to do more than the ATV, like play Amazon Prime Video.
I’m not sure that’s true. The user is apples customer but that isn’t the case for Roku. As a result recommended content is totally different. Your media player should never recommend content streaming on a service you don’t subscribe to on the player unless you ask it to do that.
 
I’m not sure that’s true. The user is apples customer but that isn’t the case for Roku. As a result recommended content is totally different. Your media player should never recommend content streaming on a service you don’t subscribe to on the player unless you ask it to do that.
People don't care. Look how many they sell regardless. Those users might have Apple TVs instead.
 
Love my AppleTV, I can use one remote to control everything- the box, the TV and the soundbar. Cleanest experience from all other set top boxes, great input capabilities with Siri remote. Won't change a thing about it, other than making it even easier to stream from devices such as phones or computers.
 
How are you paying 2 to 3 times as much? Your only other comparable option is the Sheild and that costs $200. Unless you want to compare these sticks that do not do the same things as the Apple TV. Which would be like comparing the cost of a Vespa with an F150.
What can an apple tv do that an amazon fire stick can’t, besides airplay, that grants the price difference?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Heat_Fan89
AppleTV does Airplay, as you mentioned. Plus it has Apple Arcade, and an ethernet port.

I'm not sure how much audio codec or HDR support a FireStick has... so that might be another differentiator.

But if all someone wants to do is "watch video" there won't be much difference to them. FireStick is fine.
 
The remote?
Ugh - no way

Most all the remotes are better than the Apple one unless obsessed with weight/build quality for some reason.
Apple's remote is crap. I haven't tried the new remote but the remote that came with my 2015 Apple TV is frustrating to use. IMO, Apple got a little too cute with the touchpad. I purchased two of the new Chromecast and I much prefer Google's remote.

That said the Apple TV UX has little advantages over what Roku, Chromecast have to offer. You just learn how to navigate them with each device. With Chromecast, there's little need to go to the settings and the shows and Movies are on the main page. I also like what Google did with the Google TV app on the phones. It's pretty slick what you can do with it and how it integrates with Chromecast.
 
What can an apple tv do that an amazon fire stick can’t, besides airplay, that grants the price difference?
Not lag. Not buffer. Not show ads. Not crash. It’s got a far more intuitive remote, which is the only remote I have seen that allows fine tuning of scrubbing through content. You can hot swap between streaming services. PIP video. It has real third party support, made by third parties and not just cobbled together apps that rarely see updates. It live-streams security and doorbell cameras. Acts as a smart hub for HomeKit. Does the full setup including signing me into services and configured Wi-Fi by placing my iPhone on top of it. I don’t have to verify my TV service when I download a new app because it knows I already have that channel in my package. Takes all the content I like from different services, including live sports, and provides me with a single queue of content so I never have to worry where something is streaming or if the provided service changed. I can pause it on my tv and start watching from my Mac, iPhone or iPad without having to launch the streaming services app. I don’t even have to pair my headphones or speakers because it smart swaps to the hardware I want based on what I am using at the time or if I have my headphones on. I can set a different volume for each person watching TV. So far it has been the first or one of the first services to role out updates for new protocols. It only shows me content I can watch instead of pushing services I don’t want to sign up for. It has PlayStation quality games, if I wanted to play them, and because it has ethernet steam link is actually playable. I can pick my sports teams and game conditions to be alerted about with the ability to pause my content and jump to it or send it to my phone or iPad and multitask my viewing.
 
Last edited:
What can an apple tv do that an amazon fire stick can’t, besides airplay, that grants the price difference?

For me, it’s the integration with the other Apple services such as podcasts, Apple Music, photos, as well as the ability to play Apple Arcade games.

Oh, and the fire stick isn’t available in my country.

I guess I just don’t see the point of scrimping and saving on a product I will be using for 4-5 years.
 
You just described a lot of Niche benefits. Most people are not using a phone app to control their streaming device, and I would venture to say even less people can tell a difference in the upscale engines.
Sure. Most people don’t notice anything I notice little things and they add up for me. Once you start using things a certain. Way you realize how much better it is.
if people just want a streaming device that doesn’t do anything else and are ok with the ui and user experience the 40$ devices do the job. I’m way beyond the basic things in the stuff I want.
 
  • Like
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
You just described a lot of Niche benefits. Most people are not using a phone app to control their streaming device, and I would venture to say even less people can tell a difference in the upscale engines.
1. If we aren't going to value features because some people don't use them, how do we discuss their value for those who do?
2. So the Apple TV produces a better image, but image quality doesn't matter in this situation because it isn't better enough?
3. Don't cherry-pick points or we are going to assume you agree with the other four points that they made.
 
I’m still waiting for the true Apple TV. The one Steve Jobs reportedly ‘cracked’ on his deathbed. If you’ve read his biography it sounded pretty clear he had a vision for an Apple TV set. Never seemed to have panned out and I’ve always been curious as to why
Also curious about this. I think apple has had his idea in mind and has been working on it. Just waiting for the right time to release it. The appletv’s now are definitely not what he had in mind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JoshuaBru
For me, it’s the integration with the other Apple services such as podcasts, Apple Music, photos, as well as the ability to play Apple Arcade games.

Oh, and the fire stick isn’t available in my country.

I guess I just don’t see the point of scrimping and saving on a product I will be using for 4-5 years.
If you use that services then it makes sense for you. If you use it just as a streaming device there’s no real benefit.
 
They should be working on a way to get the current Apple TV down in price. There is absolutely no justification for being $179 other than the ease-of-use, and that’s not good enough.

The Google Chomecast that Google sent to me for FREE (not even $20) is quite easy to use. In one particular aspect it is even easier to use in that it shows me a bunch of my partially watched shows right from the desktop. The remote is super nice too. I like it better. The only thing I don’t like about the remote is there is no find feature if it gets lost in the couch. I haven’t even used my Apple TV in six months. That’s what Apple is up against.


Are the tv sticks from the big players comparable to Apple TV? Can you do more, than just play Netflix and Prime?

I’ve never done it, but you can play games on the Google Chomecast. And streaming music like Spotify too. As I mentioned above, both Apple TV and Chromecast meet my needs, but Google does it so much cheaper and frankly, I have had less issues with the new Chromecast than the Apple TV. Granted the Apple TV is much more fluid, the Chromecast can be a little clunky on the main menu at times, but it just works and hasn’t given me too many hassles. I felt like I was fighting the Apple TV at times. Especially the horrible remote.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
If you use that services then it makes sense for you. If you use it just as a streaming device there’s no real benefit.

One more thing I can think of is privacy. We have heard reports of how many smart TVs are “phoning home” and reporting what you are doing and watching on your TV. This is why I use my smart TV as a dumb screen and use my Apple TV to supply the streaming content.

I admit I don’t know if it’s actually helping, but I like to think that it does.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Michael Scrip
1. If we aren't going to value features because some people don't use them, how do we discuss their value for those who do?
2. So the Apple TV produces a better image, but image quality doesn't matter in this situation because it isn't better enough?
3. Don't cherry-pick points or we are going to assume you agree with the other four points that they made.

Unless you are doing sidebyside comparisons, I promise you 99.9% will never notice the image processing of a streaming device. Your TV is the biggest factor in determining image quality. My main point is that the AppleTV is not worth double the cost of the competition. Hell, even Roku has added airplay.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
One more thing I can think of is privacy. We have heard reports of how many smart TVs are “phoning home” and reporting what you are doing and watching on your TV. This is why I use my smart TV as a dumb screen and use my Apple TV to supply the streaming content.

I admit I don’t know if it’s actually helping, but I like to think that it does.
Not the best week for claiming the privacy card, is it? 😜

No need to ellaborate, I trust apple over other vendors on that side. I just don’t care that much if sony gets the info of what shows and movies I watch, IF they are indeed collecting that info, which remains to be seen. I wouldn’t be shocked if amazon analyzes the hell out of everything going in and out of fire sticks, though.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: iterva
Not the best week for claiming the privacy card, is it?

No need to ellaborate, I trust apple over other vendors on that side. I just don’t care that much if sony gets the info of what shows and movies I watch, IF they are indeed collecting that info, which remains to be seen. I wouldn’t be shocked if amazon analyzes the hell out of everything going in and out of fire sticks, though.

Haha, yeah.

The new TV in my bedroom actually comes with a ton of streaming services right out of the box. But I am also currently listening to my favourites mix via Apple Music on my TV, and I play a bit of World of Demons (Apple Arcade) on my Apple TV, paired to a PS5 controller.

I guess the only reason an Apple TV makes sense is if you are extremely entrenched in the Apple ecosystem and even then, I concede that the differentiating factors grow lesser day by day, especially since Apple doesn’t seem to have plans for it beyond streaming.

I have 3 3rd-gen Apple TV’s in my school for airplay mirroring in the classroom though. Those still work magnificently.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Manzanito
Unless you are doing sidebyside comparisons, I promise you 99.9% will never notice the image processing of a streaming device. Your TV is the biggest factor in determining image quality. My main point is that the AppleTV is not worth double the cost of the competition. Hell, even Roku has added airplay.
4. The Apple TV is better, but since other things can impact the experience the Apple TV isn’t better?
5. 18 pages of facts, testimonials, and examples detailing how it’s better but none of that matters if you ignore them.
 
Anybody else utterly disappointed with the new Siri Remote (form factor-wise) compared to the previous generation? I'm sure Jony Ive would never have let that botched design out of the door!
 
Why are you riding so hard for the Apple TV? Some people think it is a great value, some do not.

I've been wondering the same thing.
Feels so over the top for some reason.

I like my Apple TV's, but I have a couple Chromecasts too...my aunt has some Roku's and they work great for her (built into her TVs). I have a friend who's all in on voice controlling his setup with Google Home and all that.

Lots of great ways to go about this all just depending upon preferences and needs, etc.

I really don't find any of it dramatically better or worse than the rest of it -- particularly if you have simple needs of just "watching stuff".
 
  • Like
Reactions: justin0712
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.