Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The weight and capacity of batteries are limiting factors right now. Whoever makes great leaps forward is going to have a big market advantage.

But the trouble with solar power, for many of us geeks, is that we never go outside!
 
We can figure that one out but those who make great profit from existing energy sources can't figure out how to preserve and/or make more money by evolving toward Solar. Develop small, cheap, relatively high-efficiency solar cells and people will buy their own, put them on their roofs, cars, etc and then stop sending an ever-increasingly large payment to the power company. Those who profit from those payments want to keep those monthly payments flowing (and growing).

The utility that sends you the monthly bill doesn't do R&D. A utility is a public service, not a startup corp that invents brand new generation technologies like next gen solar PV.

That's also why they desperately want the hydrogen fuel cell concept to be the future for automobiles, as then there is a reason to keep having to go to a refueling station and pay for fuel on a regular basis. Heaven forbid we evolve technologies that might allow us to do away with the gas station.

First, if people (mostly environmentalists) ever wanted hydrogen fuel cell vehicles, it's because it would shift us away from oil dependence, not because corporations thought it would be cost effective to spend billions of dollars to build hydrogen pipelines and refueling stations all over your neighborhood. Second, the current reality is nobody wants hydrogen fuel cell vehicles anymore. Everyone wants electric vehicles.

In capitalism, the ultimate problem is when a big leap forward will extinguish a mainstream commodity market (like utilities, communications, insurance, etc- the stuff just about everyone must pay for on a regular basis) AND you have a small pool of very wealthy people who are on the receiving end of those cash flows. They have ZERO incentive to invest or support drives to cut their own revenue throats... even for the betterment of their fellow man and the planet. Instead, they'll be quick to buy out the independent inventor breakthroughs and suppress internal innovations that risk the status quo.

These are the companies quick to patent everything for defensive purposes. In other words, they're not patenting something to protect their opportunity when they go to market... they have NO intention of going to market. Instead, they seek lots of patents to use against others who might want to take something to market that might upset their apple cart. IMO, defensive patents should be killed off with a "use it or lose it policy." Little-to-no progress in going to market or licensing it to go to market turns the patent into public domain in the short term. A better patent system should be about bringing big innovations to market ASAP, not blocking others from bringing life-changing innovations to market.

Your conspiracy model doesn't apply to utilities. Your money flow is all wrong, utilities don't do R&D or hold next-gen tech patents, and a large chunk of them are municipal, where money ends up going not to a few wealthy individuals, but back to the city that owns them to fund general services.
 
Let's hope cases get solar panels, too. I have a Mophie case/external battery pack, which would cover up any solar panels on the back.

I do like the idea, though.

There was a solar powered case/charger for the iPhone and iPod touch called the Surge by Novothink. An interesting idea, but the reviews I've read about the Surge were not overly stellar. It appears that Novothink went out of business, though. Their website is now a generic landing site and their Twitter account was last updated in October 2010.
 
Phones + Solar Panels

I'm interested in the potential applications we might see with such technology where an integrated solar panel could recapture some of the power from the light produced by the device or the surrounding environment. This still looks to be a pipe dream for now, but hopefully in 5 to 10 years we will scoff at how we had to use CABLES to charge up our phones.

Integrated solar panels can have a certain level of distinguishing factor to a device, but I could not imagine Apple slapping a solar panel on one of their products unless it was seamless and indistinguishable from the rest of the product. Unfortunately, there are quite a few products on the market which look like some frankenstein project created in someone's garage.

Even if solar panels are adhered to a phone, there is an issue with heat. A recent blog post on Nokia's Solar Charging Blog mentioned that their experimental solar powered phone laying on a car's dashboard reached 59 °C (138 °F). I encountered a similar issue with the Solio Classic-i, which cannot exceed 49 °C (120 °F) before the Solio shuts down to protect itself from heat damage.

At this time, solar panels on a phone are not efficient enough to be able to keep a phone sufficiently charged -- especially a power-hungry smart phone. Last week I ran an experiment to determine if I could go the entire week by charging my iPhone by only using solar power. I came fairly close and only plugged my iPhone into my computer twice (once for an iOS update, and the other time to charge up my phone since I didn't have my Solio on me). It is possible, but it takes some work to conserve battery power and harvest enough solar power in the meantime.
 
I'm interested in the potential applications we might see with such technology where an integrated solar panel could recapture some of the power from the light produced by the device...

OMG - - perpetual motion at last!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.