It's too bad the 27' iMac lost target display mode when retina happened. It would be cool to use the display of one with the Mac Studio. (Rather than buying the same display again...)
Yeah, they seem to be missing the point of modularity. Making you buy a separate monitor/un-upgradable desktop/mouse/keyboard isn't the kind of "modular" anyone was excited about from a desktop. Hopefully a larger iMac that doesn't look as ugly as the 24" one still appears at some stage, once they're done giving the new Studio the spotlight.I don’t get it – what part of the Mac Studio is concidered "modular"? It was mentioned in the presentation I think.
You are thinking *way* too much about this. If you’re more concerned about a presentation than a product, whether it’s a good product or not, it seems like you’re the one concerned with style over substance, you just prefer a different styleHere is a rant. Bear with me please - I have a feeling this is what a lot of people think so I wanted to say it.
I have really wanted to go back to the Mac OS land...I have switched back to the Windows OS after my 2009 iMac hard drive went kaput with no warning in 2015. Honestly, while the entry level Studio seems to be performing wonderfully and is much more compact than any PC, the thing that is preventing me from clicking that "Place Your Order" button is the tone of this presentation. It literally embodied all the BS political correctness, virtue signalling and slimy fake car salesperson tactics that pervades our Western societies. It all seemed very artificial and disingenuous - it felt like Apple has become primarily a marketing company rather than a tech company with a focus on innovation in terms of user experience. The whole shtick about not having enough time to stir your coffee before getting to work because the files are opening so fast on the new Studio pushed me over the top. You don't need to treat your professional customers like idiots, Apple. These are people who know how beneficial it is to cut the rendering time of a project in half. Sometimes you do not need to spell things out literally and treat your customer base in a heavy-handed fashion.
With the inflation going rampant, prices of gas going bonkers and a war in Europe threatening to spread further, Apple had a wonderful opportunity to have a more down-to-earth, scaled back presentation that captured the sombre zeitgeist better. Perhaps have a more humane concept for your presentation that would resonate with the viewers. While they have slowly been losing touch with me as a consumer since Steve Jobs passed away, today felt particularly tone deaf. And I am not saying that they should have politicized this event - not at all. Just that they have to be aware that their customer base is the middle class whose buying power has been steadily eroded by the inflationary trends. Further to this, a lot of us have been losing our trust in various corporate institutions over the last few years, so to have Apple present a more humane face would have been a huge plus. This way, it is strictly business as usual - the $600 Mac Pro Wheel Kit kind of business.
I suspect 2 reasons. Firstly, to make vast amounts of cash by forcing people to pay for performance they don't need. Secondly, you may need at least the Max for so many Thunderbolt connections. If this is the case, maybe they didn't want to design 2 slightly different enclosures.The weird thing that’s missing from the lineup is the M1 Pro.
My guess it there will be a silent update to the Mini line with this, or maybe the Studio range will get it in a few months.
Just seems odd to have that chip only appear in the MacBook Pro line when it seems like the obvious drop in replacement for the high end Intel Mini.
LIDAR isn't but the FaceID and camera are fantastic.I mean, LIDAR, camera, and faceID aren’t exactly selling points, but the other features might be.
Quad speakers, faceID, promotion, thunderbolt, and a better camera. At a $200 difference I can see how it's a consideration for many, but If you can find the 11" Pro on sale like I did ($100 off) it's a no-brainer.I would choose this iPad Air over an iPad Pro. Is storage the only reason to get a pro now?
Yup. It's the guts and ports of what we kind of expected with a new iMac Pro but now sitting on your desk. I was hoping they would show the case open up with some user expansion options for adding SSD's or even changing the start-up SSD. But now, another box with extra drives will sit on my desk. So, as far as I can see, it's a new iMac Pro but with more cables and clutter.I don’t get it – what part of the Mac Studio is concidered "modular"? It was mentioned in the presentation I think.
No one, and I will die on this hill, should be taking pictures with an iPad.LIDAR isn't but the FaceID and camera are fantastic.
Please explain the relation to an accessory product ike a keyboard from a main core product like the iPhone.Then why did they start adding Touch ID to keyboards recently?
1. The problem is your’s, not Apple’s.Some random thoughts:
I appreciate Apple's products and the power it has put in the M1 processor. However, Apple's recent business and pricing tactics have driven me further and further away from its products. I am just hoping Qualcomm and/or Intel catch up with the M1 soon enough so there is more competition to put pressure on Apple.
- The "Max" in the M1 Max is supposed to mean "Maximum", which is defined, by the Cambridge Dictionary, as "being the largest amount or number allowed or possible". I was not expecting Apple to release an even higher-end M1 Ultra, which is more than the Max. There is a serious nomenclature problem here.
- The M1 Ultra satisfies Tim Cook's desire to repeatedly upsell. M1 Ultra > M1 Max > M1 Pro > M1. What will power the Mac Pro?
- It puzzles me that the iPad Air and the iPad Pro have now the same processor. The 10.9-inch iPad Air sells for $599 (with 64 GB) and the 11-inch iPad Pro (with 128 GB) sells for $799. The 10.9-inch Air with 256 GB sells for $749; $150 for 192 GB storage is a total rip-off, but it still seems more worth it than the Pro.
- The high-end Mac Studio comes with 1 TB SSD only. Upgrading it to 2 TB costs $400, which is 10% of the overall price of the computer. Apple is again unashamedly overcharging for upgrades. And, even more unashamedly, 1 TB on the Mac Studio costs $400 ($0.4 per gigabyte), while 192 GB costs $150 on the iPad Air ($0.78 per gigabyte).
- The Studio Display costs $1,599, which is more affordable than what people were expecting. Still not "consumer-level", but it may find its way with creative professionals.
- Is the 27-inch iMac gone forever? Does it mean that the alternative is buying a Mac Mini ($699 minimum) or a Mac Studio ($1,999) plus the Studio Display ($1,599), plus mouse and keyboard, with an overall price tag much higher than the previous 27-inch iMac, just to have more wires and less convenience?
- How can the nano-texture glass cost $300 on the Studio Display and still cost $1,000 on the Pro Display XDR?
You have two USB-C slots on the front to plug in your preferred card reader. Let it go.A version of the Mac Studio without a front SD slot would make it perfect. Or even better if it had dual CF Express type B slots for photo pros.
Good news! You don't need to use the slot if you don't want to.A version of the Mac Studio without a front SD slot would make it perfect. Or even better if it had dual CF Express type B slots for photo pros.
They are certainly well done technically, though it's all quite sterile. I kinda miss the awkward pacing, perspiration, wrinkled shirts, and hearing grown men shouting "woooooooo!" at every new announcement.I like the theatrics. It keeps an an otherwise staid presentation lively. Some of their artists have mad skills producing that.
Life’s just full of compromises, isn’t it?I'm here hoping for a notch-less MacBook Pro or Air and I'm getting television ads.
Ok, well my true hope is for a M1/2 Pro with more cores instead of the media accelerators.
I saw a YouTuber add his palm prints into touch ID so the iPad would easily unlock no matter what orientation he was holding it in. Definitely a cool idea.Oh agreed. Every feature is hit or miss depending on the person. Face ID struggles every time I change my glasses. Touch ID never fails for me. But I don’t add all 10 fingers, I add thumb and index four times and middle twice. I am never going to unlock a device with my pinkies.
That’s not bad. It makes me wonder if nose prints would work too.I saw a YouTuber add his palm prints into touch ID so the iPad would easily unlock no matter what orientation he was holding it in. Definitely a cool idea.
Power lead included.The new monitor it doesn’t mention the power lead in the box, does that mean it comes without one? Or does the studio power it??
Thanks, shame you need two plugs now compared to the one with a 27” iMacPower lead included.
Brb, taking my iPad into the bathroom to run some other "tests"That’s not bad. It makes me wonder if nose prints would work too.