greenmonsterman said:here's hoping for a macbook without integrated graphics.
*crosses fingers*
Opps, that's not a good sign.arn said:surprisingly, this hasn't yet been confirmed by any other news sources.
freeny said:Im going. My invite says "Win great prizes. Get a commemorative t-shirt."
Never been one to pass on SWAG.![]()
So keep iBook and not PowerBook. Not likely.ero87 said:I think it will stay "iBook"! It's silly for them to keep iMac but get rid of iBook. Doesn't make any sense.
although that "macbook" leak on the apple site seems to douse my argument a little...
Are you referring to the store opening invite or the media invite?milo said:Could someone who has the invite post it?
steve_hill4 said:I still have a suspicion that at some point either the iMac as a name will be dropped, or the iBook will be renamed and realigned to another line, perhaps MacBook Mini.
milo said:But my favorite recent rumor is macosrumors, they're still insisting the name will stay iBook. Idiots.
dongmin said:hah, I think they're quite clever. they have no facts, no sources, no reporting. and yet, they're still able to generate a lot of hits on their page and sell ads and make money.
i think they 'get it' more than the most of us here who take this rumor business so bloody seriously.
Machead III said:I'm sorry but who the motherf***ing son of a b**** ****sucker needs a hypothetical MacBook Mini?!?!
milo said:The same people who use ultralights like the ones from Sony. What's so unreasonable about wanting a mac that's designed for minimum size and weight, and maximum battery life?
Machead III said:I'm sorry but who the motherf***ing son of a b**** ****sucker needs a hypothetical MacBook Mini?!?! If you don't want a dedicated GPU, an up-to-speed processor and room for a fair amount of RAM, go buy a bloody smartphone or a tablet.
Now, I already have a smartphone, so what I don't need from Apple is some underwhelming cheapo laptop for people who aren't gonna do anything else other than check their mail and organise their music in iTunes.
A portable consumer laptop please Apple, and that means no measly Core Solo, and no pathetic integrated graphics.
milo said:Makes perfect sense if you're aware that Jobs said that all macs would have MAC in the name.
Who? About half the votersrussed said:who has put this down as a negative? unhappy it isnt here now... today? cant people have some patience!
The PowerBook just means "power" as in "powerful." PowerBooks existed for many years before PowerPC processors appeared.ero87 said:the powerbook HAD to be renamed because it still had a name referring to PowerPC processors.
I can't believe people are still going on and on about this. Jeez.ero87 said:If I remember correctly, he did NOT say that all macs would have "mac" in their name. It seemed more like a small aside to rationalize the renaming of the Powerbook.
the powerbook HAD to be renamed because it still had a name referring to PowerPC processors. Just because Jobs said "we'd like "mac" to be in our products' names" doesn't mean that it will be in EVERY name. For example, the iMac!!!
besides, "i" has come to be synonmous with mac. iPod, iLife, iTunes... everyone knows the connection.
ero87 said:If I remember correctly, he did NOT say that all macs would have "mac" in their name. It seemed more like a small aside to rationalize the renaming of the Powerbook.
the powerbook HAD to be renamed because it still had a name referring to PowerPC processors. Just because Jobs said "we'd like "mac" to be in our products' names" doesn't mean that it will be in EVERY name. For example, the iMac!!!
besides, "i" has come to be synonmous with mac. iPod, iLife, iTunes... everyone knows the connection.