CalMin
Contributor
Yep, I think that with many things, not just Apple products, the questions people are more likely to ask than before are:
Does what I have do everything I want it to do? Will it keep doing this tomorrow / next week / next month?
If the answer is yes, and people are feeling the pinch of rising costs, then why upgrade?
The thing I am most concerned about here is planned obsolescence. My M1Pro still runs like a champ at 5-years old it still feels new. But - Apple (seemingly arbitrarily) has dropped support for some features on devices which have CPUs under the M3 generation. To my mind there is a HUGE difference between a base M1 with 8GB and a 64GB M1 Max, but both are equally cutoff from features under MacOS 27.
I hate being a conspiracist because there may well be valid technical reasons for this cut-off, such as CPU architecture or NPU enhancements, but I'd prefer Apple state this plainly or even offer the feature at reduced performance to those with older hardware, and then let us decide if we want to use it or not. Because they simply draw a cut line and say 'nope', I can't help but feel that this cutoff is to push upgrades.
They knocked it out of the park with M1 generations. That my 5-year old M1Pro still crushes my everyday MS Office based workload, edits 4K Multicam and runs the latest OS like butter is remarkable. New hardware would be one reason to upgrade, but Apple doesn't do that as often as they used to. So without new hardware, perhaps they are resorting to software differentiation...