Actually it is even later, 31 July to be guaranteed to have the second non bug version.
Update: screenshot and link to PDF
http://qdms.intel.com/dm/d.aspx/C79FC2E6-6B75-4063-8687-660F4668FFC8/PCN112101-00.pdf
I feel like we did this song and dance when Sandy Bridge first came out with a SATA III bug.
I wonder if this refresh will be the one that kills the classic unbody design or if we'll see Apple wait for that for one more upgrade cycle.
I'd wager that the 15" classic unibody will be gone with the refresh and replaced with a 15" retina model occupying that one remaining $1799 price-point but only coming with Haswell's integrated graphics and no discrete just like Apple did in 2009 with the low-end 15" model of that rev.
As for the 13", my guess is that they'd keep just the higher-end current model around (and otherwise not update it) for a rev. Then, the rev afterwards, they'd kill it and that'd be the end of anything not bearing both a retina display or the new design that debuted last year.
Killing the non-retina MBP is a mistake until flash comes way down in price. I personally can't stand the idea of a $2k-$3.5k laptop that is not upgradeable at all and is at EOL support after 1 YR unless you pay $350 for EOL support in 3YRs. Financially, not wise on any level.
I agree, but I think Apple sees this as being tolerable for a majority of MacBook Pro customers and will thusly press onward with it. But yeah, I'm not down with that either, hence going with a 15" non-retina last Fall instead of the identically specced Retina models.
What is wrong with a thunderbolt external drive? Cheap and fast. Or just a firewire external drive, cheaper and fast enough?
Nothing's WRONG with it per se. But it is more cumbersome to take your portable machine and have to cart around a bunch of accessories for it that you need because Apple decided to make the machine ever so thinner, especially if you use them all frequently.
I'm just curious what activities require more than 512 GB of storage but also demand such a high degree of portability that a 2 pound external drive is a problem? And yet, this activity does not benefit more from moving off an internal HD so an SSD (which seems to me the biggest performance boost for most activities in the last several years of computing). I mean I understand the value proposition of the non-retina MBP line to save $500. But in what context is it actually a more productive machine?
Productivity isn't the argument. Convenience, on the other hand, is.
The air will not get retina for years period. There is no way to do it due to power consumption and no way it makes sense as then the pro really has no advantage over the air. When the air could potentially get retina it will just be the pro and the air will be dropped entirely from the line. More likely next step for the air line will be to decrease bezel size on the screen to decrease overall size of the 13" and keep the 11.6" the same size but increase the display to a 16:10 aspect ratio
Uh, you do realize that one of Haswell's key features is increased power efficiency, right?
Here's to hoping for a 17" rMBP with Ethernet.
Uh, you do realize that the retina machines are too thin for an Ethernet port and that the best you'd get here is a third Thunderbolt port that you could use for a Gigabit Ethernet adapter, right?
I mean, they could build in an Ethernet chipset and use a smaller proprietary port with an included proprietary dongle that provided Ethernet like some Ultrabooks do, but I don't see Apple putting that much effort into providing complementary Ethernet into its MagSafe 2 era laptops.
Having to cart around an ethernet port when most users don't need one is just plain crap.
Like it's such a heavy thing to cart around...
Spending $2199 on a computer and not having some form of ethernet is just plain crap, I'm sorry. It's not a freakin' iPad; it's not a freakin' smartphone; it's a full-fledged computer; should it ever be placed in an environment where transferring files between machines is key or where internet connectivity stability is highly valued, then it will flounder unless one spends that additional $30. That is annoying. Good for you that you are exempt from that annoyance; please be respectful of those who aren't.
What is the business or professional use that you do where your entire iTunes and Aperture libraries are useful to have with you? That was my question. I just don't know any business use where people are leaving their desk to go off site (hence need portability) but also need to bring with them 100s of GBs of files. I'm curious.
For people that have a MacBook Pro as their ONLY COMPUTER! Or are you saying that I should leave my pictures, movies, and videos on separate drives and plug them in when I want to use my computer for general home use, because that's not even remotely convenient.
Oh...key..,
What is easier to happen?
A Quad Core Air or a 13" with discrete Gpu...or maybe
a 13" with Quad core and still...

no discrete Gpu
a dual Air with just a redesign?
Quad-Core Air; though you won't see it this time around. You might with Broadwell, though I'm not overly optimistic. You'll soon see a 13" retina MacBook Pro with a Quad-core CPU, but odds are you won't ever see either machine with discrete graphics; and really, given the improvements being made to integrated graphics, you won't really appreciate the then-added benefit that discrete will offer until you get to larger screen sizes anyway.
Then 1TB probably isn't enough space, and flash is faster than you need. You'll be hauling around a bunch of equipment anyway, so a small pile of 1-3TB USB3 portable drives will fit in.
A highly specialized application anyway. Cool, but not big enough demand to push 1TB SSDs out to everyone at low cost. Someday, yes, ...but then you'll be annoyed that your 4K 48fps videos don't fit.
I ordered my non-retina 15" with a 1TB hard drive because (a) I didn't have the money to shell out for a 768GB SSD on a retina and (b) I have ~800GB of data. Until Apple has their proprietary mSATA stick drives at 1+GB and on the cheap, I think people like me, who want to have everything on one portable computer with as few external things as possible will not be satisfied with either the current retina offering nor the idea of having to use one with external drives in tow. For some, that's just plain inconvenient.
Given their history I'm betting the next MBP update will say bye-bye to the DVD and the MBP and MBPr will merge into one line with retina on the top models and a 'normal' LCD on the lower models. JMO
You were doing so well up until the "and" after "DVD". Retina is the future; they've said it themselves. They want that display to become the new standard. Given their history, they'll kill the non-retina MBPs and the retina MBPs will become the only MBPs 'til next we design refresh.