Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
What can I say? It's obviously not what I was expecting. You're expecting me to twist facts and somehow pretend I was right? I was also interested in the Q2 guidance which again is surprisingly high.

Same logic as before, Timmy says they didn't even consider the effect of the battery program in the guidance. How can that possibly be true? It is a factor that they should at least consider, even if they don't believe it will have any impact, they should have some basis for concluding that. Claiming they didn't even think about it makes Apple sound like they have no clue what they're doing. If true, again I think Q2 will have to miss their guidance that didn't factor it in how can people knowing they can speed up their old phone for $29 not have at least some effect on sales.

We've been hearing reports about Apple slashing orders for iPhone X next corner, which even Apple apologists have been saying makes sense and is no big deal because they get their sales the first quarter and always cut back next quarter (which is true). How do you reconcile that with $60-62 billion guidance vs under $50 billion same quarter last year?
Hey, I know predicting the future is hard. I just follow them closely and Apple makes their profit.

We are getting to the point where there are so many active iPhones, it gets impossible to say a large crop won’t be upgrading, regardless. With 1.3B iPhones, only 10% upgrading is 130M.

Appreciate you being cool on this. I got a little too bullish and emotional. I was saying $94B in revenue. I was off base a little high, but I did know it would be insanely good and it was.
[doublepost=1517534172][/doublepost]
A record in iPhones sales...easily right?
So even with following the company as close as you do my prediction was better. Don't act like you know what you're talking about. You really have no idea what you are talking about. I didn't even have to watch the company close to know what I was talking about.;)

You were wrong again saying unit sales need to be above 80M for Apple to be viewed as successful.



So much for being a FACT that Apple will sell more than 78M phones. Spewing facts based off of speculation is not a fact. Again not shocking you were once again wrong.
Let me also apologize to you for getting too caught up in the quarter. I was off base and wrong on the total unit sales. I also should have been nicer to you.

However, despite being a little off on the iPhone sales, we can agree the $61.5B in revenue from iPhone and an $800 ASP is insane. They are up 13% y/y in iPhone revenue, total revenue, and totsl profit.

I will still give myself credit for being dead right on their profit. They got there a different way, but they ultimately got where I expected. I basically assumed $750 ASP and they did $800. My revenue projection was $750 times 82m= $61.5B they did $800 times 77.3m = $61.5B. Insane.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Blaze4G
Hey, I know predicting the future is hard. I just follow them closely and Apple makes their profit.

We are getting to the point where there are so many active iPhones, it gets impossible to say a large crop won’t be upgrading, regardless. With 1.3B iPhones, only 10% upgrading is 130M.

Appreciate you being cool on this. I got a little too bullish and emotional. I was saying $94B in revenue. I was off base a little high, but I did know it would be insanely good and it was.
[doublepost=1517534172][/doublepost]
Let me also apologize to you for getting too caught up in the quarter. I was off base and wrong on the total unit sales. I also should have been nicer to you.

However, despite being a little off on the iPhone sales, we can agree the $61.5B in revenue from iPhone and an $800 ASP is insane. They are up 13% y/y in iPhone revenue, total revenue, and totsl profit.

I will still give myself credit for being dead right on their profit. They got there a different way, but they ultimately got where I expected. I basically assumed $750 ASP and they did $800. My revenue projection was $750 times 82m= $61.5B they did $800 times 77.3m = $61.5B. Insane.
I agree and apology accepted. They did pretty well, although I wish that wasn't the case. Reason being, this kind of confirms that Apple has no reason to lower their prices.

With new products coming this year and mac pro they should have a record year if it all works out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Baymowe335
I agree and apology accepted. They did pretty well, although I wish that wasn't the case. Reason being, this kind of confirms that Apple has no reason to lower their prices.

With new products coming this year and mac pro they should have a record year if it all works out.
Thanks. Agreed as paying more is never fun.

However, I think the strategy is more tech crammed in a phone (useful and liked or not) and increase pricing. It appears people are willing to pay as the X carried the day to get to $800 ASP. That shocks even me, an obvious AAPL bull. I didn’t expect people to be this willing to pay higher prices. If you’re Apple, why not get it if you can, particularly if you think you’re adding features customers want.

I have to say, I do love my X because it’s more modern and runs iOS. I came from Android and liked the tech, but the software was too buggy and support non existent. I had a note, and those weren’t cheap either.

Can we really point to anything that gets cheaper?! Seems nothing ever does!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blaze4G
Is iPhone X 67% more innovative than the iPhone 4 was at the time of the release? I don't think so.

The majority of iPhone buyers during the quarter clearly thought so. Perhaps your opinion isn't representative?
[doublepost=1517541543][/doublepost]
Moderator Note:

Can everyone just give the 'Apple is doomed' crap a rest.

Well, where are the mod when – year after year – people latch on to the doom forecasts and demand TC to be fired? That gets old, too, and is decidedly not funny.
 
Hey, I know predicting the future is hard. I just follow them closely and Apple makes their profit.

We are getting to the point where there are so many active iPhones, it gets impossible to say a large crop won’t be upgrading, regardless. With 1.3B iPhones, only 10% upgrading is 130M.

Appreciate you being cool on this. I got a little too bullish and emotional. I was saying $94B in revenue. I was off base a little high, but I did know it would be insanely good and it was.

I appreciate your being cool on it too.

I gave my opinion I really believed in before earnings. Even wrong, I not going to pretend otherwise; if I flip-flop after the fact my opinion would be meaningless going forward.

Did you see what Apple stock did today? I'm not even going to try to explain it but I've got to say making $6k when I expected to lose $4k is a pretty nice feeling.
[doublepost=1517604547][/doublepost]
And then there is Apple who various people have predicted the beginning of the end since 2011. Well Apple refused to roll over for these folks and now is close to $1T.

Well today they're more than $35 billion farther away from $1T than they were yesterday. That brings the drop to over $100 Billion in under 2 weeks. I hope the board is asking Timmy some hard questions this weekend.
 
Well today they're more than $35 billion farther away from $1T than they were yesterday. That brings the drop to over $100 Billion in under 2 weeks. I hope the board is asking Timmy some hard questions this weekend.
I guarantee the board isn’t asking Timmy anything as they realize Apple went with the rest of the market. In fact, They sent Timmy on vacation. Timmy isn’t going anywhere not with a record breaking $82 billion.
 
Last edited:
I appreciate your being cool on it too.

I gave my opinion I really believed in before earnings. Even wrong, I not going to pretend otherwise; if I flip-flop after the fact my opinion would be meaningless going forward.

Did you see what Apple stock did today? I'm not even going to try to explain it but I've got to say making $6k when I expected to lose $4k is a pretty nice feeling.
[doublepost=1517604547][/doublepost]

Well today they're more than $35 billion farther away from $1T than they were yesterday. That brings the drop to over $100 Billion in under 2 weeks. I hope the board is asking Timmy some hard questions this weekend.
Unfortunately, I see what Apple and the broader market do every day.

Bad day all around. Apple can continue buyback on Tuesday next week so I think shorts are in control until then. GOOGL was down even harder. GOOGL had a worse quarter than AAPL, but I still don't think it was bad. AMZN is the one I still can't understand.

This is purely manipulation. Apple just confirmed what I have believed for years. They earned more profit than ever and more Apple devices are active than ever. Analysts holding Apple to this made up standard even after 13% y/y growth is just ludicrous. Apple exceeded the high end of their guidance and their profit was the highest ever. The "negative" was they "only" sold 77.3M iPhones when analysts thought 82M. I thought so too, but I didn't expect an $800 ASP. That made up for the slightly light iPhone sales. iPhone revenue was $62B versus $54B last year.

Anyway, I think it's irresponsible to look at a 90 day period and judge a company's worth based on those 90 days. Apple is clearly the most profitable company in the world and just posted the best quarter in corporate history. Stock goes down 4%. But that's stocks.
 
Bad day all around. Apple can continue buyback on Tuesday next week so I think shorts are in control until then. GOOGL was down even harder. GOOGL had a worse quarter than AAPL, but I still don't think it was bad. AMZN is the one I still can't understand.

Apple's drop has been a lot harder than the DJIA, and as I'm sure you know Apple is so heavily weighted that a 1% drop in Apple = 10 points on the DJIA; so Apple alone is responsible for about 45 points of today's drop.

This is purely manipulation. Apple just confirmed what I have believed for years. They earned more profit than ever and more Apple devices are active than ever.

Very likely you're right about manipulation, it still seems amazing to me thought that Apple's numbers are all so good despite so much bad sounding news. Apple sold fewer phones (at a higher per unit and total price of course) in a shrinking overall smartphone market; have we passed peak smartphone as we've long ago past peak computer and peak tablet?

Analysts holding Apple to this made up standard even after 13% y/y growth is just ludicrous.

Again as I'm sure you know analysts look at y/y growth which is essentially the first derivative of revenue. But long term stock value is determine by the second derivative of revenue; the rate of change of growth, and what that is anticipated to be.

Apple exceeded the high end of their guidance and their profit was the highest ever. The "negative" was they "only" sold 77.3M iPhones when analysts thought 82M. I thought so too, but I didn't expect an $800 ASP. That made up for the slightly light iPhone sales. iPhone revenue was $62B versus $54B last year.

I understand what you're saying there, but it has a very strong resonance with the later part of Sculley's "successful" period. So I do agree with your facts but draw a different conclusion.

Dropping unit sales on a higher ASP only gets you so far.

Anyway, I think it's irresponsible to look at a 90 day period and judge a company's worth based on those 90 days. Apple is clearly the most profitable company in the world and just posted the best quarter in corporate history. Stock goes down 4%. But that's stocks.

Agreed, but I also still say Apple is chasing massive short term profit at the expense of customer loyalty and perceived product quality and value. What is the last Apple product that hasn't had some controversy over product quality?

Do you really think (going from 2015 to 2016 MBPs), the touchbar is really worth a $600 premium? That's the sort of thing that is making a huge profit now but hurting their reputation with their customers. Do you think customers cheer when they promise a $200 price cut on the MBP then when you go to order you see they cut the flash from 256 to 128 gig? Heck, my 2011 base model had 160 gig of storage, now in 2018 the base model at $300 more expensive for the non-touch model still only has 128? And the fact that we've moved to SSD is irrelevant because a 256 gig SSD in 2017 was cheaper than a 160 gig 2.5" HDD was in 2011. It is purely Apple padding their margins to give a worse experience. My 2004 powerbook g4 base model had a 60 gig HDD. Going from 2004 to 2018 -- 14 years!! -- Apple has only managed to double the storage in the base model of their MBP. That takes courage. And that 2004 was cheaper than the current 2017 yet a 60 gig HDD back in 2004 was a heck of a lot more expensive than a 256 gig SSD is today.

And that's another thing -- computers have become a lot cheaper since 2004, how is it than an entry level MBP is more expensive now than an entry level PowerBook was in 2004? Even Macs dropped significantly in price in the intervening years and then went back up even more.

Cloud storage has become so cheap; would it really hurt Apple's bottom line to increase the 5gig per device in "free' storage that they've offered for several years? I have an MBP, iPhone, and iPad on my account and that only gets me 5gig in 2018. Apple could buy a lot of goodwill for very little actual cost yet they're not willing to invest anything in goodwill anymore.

Apple is all about the profits now. They became a great company by caring about the product and customer and letting profits take care of themselves. But if they abuse their customers, they'll only go away.
 
Last edited:
Apple's drop has been a lot harder than the DJIA, and as I'm sure you know Apple is so heavily weighted that a 1% drop in Apple = 10 points on the DJIA; so Apple alone is responsible for about 45 points of today's drop.



Very likely you're right about manipulation, it still seems amazing to me thought that Apple's numbers are all so good despite so much bad sounding news. Apple sold fewer phones (at a higher per unit and total price of course) in a shrinking overall smartphone market; have we passed peak smartphone as we've long ago past peak computer and peak tablet?



Again as I'm sure you know analysts look at y/y growth which is essentially the first derivative of revenue. But long term stock value is determine by the second derivative of revenue; the rate of change of growth, and what that is anticipated to be.



I understand what you're saying there, but it has a very strong resonance with the later part of Sculley's "successful" period. So I do agree with your facts but draw a different conclusion.

Dropping unit sales on a higher ASP only gets you so far.



Agreed, but I also still say Apple is chasing massive short term profit at the expense of customer loyalty and perceived product quality and value. What is the last Apple product that hasn't had some controversy over product quality?

Do you really think (going from 2015 to 2016 MBPs), the touchbar is really worth a $600 premium? That's the sort of thing that is making a huge profit now but hurting their reputation with their customers. Do you think customers cheer when they promise a $200 price cut on the MBP then when you go to order you see they cut the flash from 256 to 128 gig? Heck, my 2011 base model had 160 gig of storage, now in 2018 the base model at $300 more expensive for the non-touch model still only has 128? And the fact that we've moved to SSD is irrelevant because a 256 gig SSD in 2017 was cheaper than a 160 gig 2.5" HDD was in 2011. It is purely Apple padding their margins to give a worse experience. My 2004 powerbook g4 base model had a 60 gig HDD. Going from 2004 to 2018 -- 14 years!! -- Apple has only managed to double the storage in the base model of their MBP. That takes courage. And that 2004 was cheaper than the current 2017 yet a 60 gig HDD back in 2004 was a heck of a lot more expensive than a 256 gig SSD is today.

And that's another thing -- computers have become a lot cheaper since 2004, how is it than an entry level MBP is more expensive now than an entry level PowerBook was in 2004? Even Macs dropped significantly in price in the intervening years and then went back up even more.

Cloud storage has become so cheap; would it really hurt Apple's bottom line to increase the 5gig per device in "free' storage that they've offered for several years? I have an MBP, iPhone, and iPad on my account and that only gets me 5gig in 2018. Apple could buy a lot of goodwill for very little actual cost yet they're not willing to invest anything in goodwill anymore.

Apple is all about the profits now. They became a great company by caring about the product and customer and letting profits take care of themselves. But if they abuse their customers, they'll only go away.
We are having a good discussion, but I take everything relatively. All companies have some issues, but just listening to the actual AAPL conf call, it was extremely bullish. Apple basically reset pricing on iPhone and sold almost as many last year with a flagship that was only available for 2/3 months in the quarter. For me, this is the only reason unit sales missed. Just not enough time to sell the X and some waiters on the X. I believe Q2 will be strong now that all products are available and supply is good. Guidance is up almost 20% over last year.

Customer satisfactions do loyalty are all time highs. It’s uncanny. I think Apple was not only insanely profitable but proved to the market they can charge even more of a premium for their products and they not only sell well, the customers are happier than ever (despite what you read here) and customers are even more loyal.

The buyback is so powerful that I just don’t see huge downside. They haven’t even released the $163B in net cash yet and Luca was pretty clear it would be deployed with shareholders.

As far as MacBook and other value questions...the numbers speak to that. MacBook needs a refresh and will get one, but the revenues were solid and people didn’t blink with price increase.

The services story is intact and CHINA was just so strong and back with a vengeance. The iPhone X bringing ASP to $800 is a huge story.

Apple is a quality company, printing money, and trading at ha,f the multiple of Microsoft. Apple made $20B this quarter, a record...yet people worry about a few million unit sales for iPhone? This is about 1.3B active devices, 240M paid subscribers, and the most loyal customers in the industry.

Apple can start buying back shares next Tuesday.

Apple is being manipulated, no question about it. The Dow was down 666...you think that was a coincidence? Lol...

Anyway, you have to put money somewhere. I just don’t see a much better business than a Apple at the moment. They are a cash machine.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.