Definitely not the flex Apple thinks it is if you're an attentive reader. More of a self- own. How did they get into the store to begin with? Oh...I wouldn't brag about approving 37000 fraud apps.
Definitely not the flex Apple thinks it is if you're an attentive reader. More of a self- own. How did they get into the store to begin with? Oh...I wouldn't brag about approving 37000 fraud apps.
Good question, I don't handle the communications with Apple's app store contact points, but I know we've escalated issues and the lack of feedback quite a few times - perhaps not high enough yet.Have you tried writing directly to Carson Oliver at Apple expressing your issues and frustrations? If so, how was it handled? Another option would be Phill Schiller.
Many such cases. The lack of transparency and uneven application of rules has hit us too. Some reviewers are strict. Some just pass the apps on through to approval. With a decidedly uneven application of quality controls Apple wants to put this puff piece out about how many things slipped by they caught after the fact and removed? How about being better all the way around.Good question, I don't handle the communications with Apple's app store contact points, but I know we've escalated issues and the lack of feedback quite a few times - perhaps not high enough yet.
As said, we don't mind rules and a rigourous validation process, as long as it makes sense and doesn't needlessly create delays/hurdles.
So I suppose Apple is not entitled to their opinion, hmmh, are you suggesting censorship?Just stop with this nonsense Apple
This is such a sad effort to try to influence opinion in their favor.
I agree 100% The free market is the solution here. If only there was some other mobileOS without those restrictions.....
There is literally an OS with over 70% marketshare that allows you to run anything you want. Apple isn't stifling innovation here. Anyone can make that app that Apple is "restricting" and show people what an amazing app it is.
A lot of folks here have strong shoulders? People are all too happy to carry water for AppleThat's a lot of words to say "if you don't like it - leave."
We only want iOS to open up a bit so that it can become a better software platform for developers and users alike. The other platform is irrelevant.
Or, put another way: you people stop having standards!Alright, let me get straight to the point ... Why are you all still using iPhones then? It’s always the same complaints, too expensive, too boring, lacking features, the App Store sucks and so on. Same story with Macs.
Alright, let me get straight to the point ... Why are you all still using iPhones then? It’s always the same complaints, too expensive, too boring, lacking features, the App Store sucks and so on. Same story with Macs.
I love this sort of non-argument. It attacks the poster without addressing the points. Gaslighting at its finest.Lack of agency, I’m guessing.
Not attacking the poster at all. Just suggesting an answer to the poster’s question.I love this sort of non-argument. It attacks the poster without addressing the points. Gaslighting at its finest.
What you're saying the people who have a criticism lack agency how is that not gaslighting or an attack?Not attacking the poster at all. Just suggesting an answer to the poster’s question.
True. Thing is, the numbers are all over the place. Their results are admittedly a mixed bag. And it's confusing (purposefully or otherwise).If they really cared this much they would have trimmed down the amount data these apps are collecting.
View attachment 2514204
Does the increase reflect poorer initial anti-fraud controls, or an increase in fraud attempts? Either they don't know. Or, they do know and left it out...thanks to continued improvements to prevent the creation of potentially fraudulent accounts in the first place.
It’s a neutral answer. Many people do not have agency in their lives over many and varied circumstances. And as I said, it’s just a guess.What you're saying the people who have a criticism lack agency how is that not gaslighting or an attack?
Saying someone lacks agency is making assumptions and jumping to conclusions about their mental faculties. How about addressing the constructive criticism instead?It’s a neutral answer. Many people do not have agency in their lives over many and varied circumstances. And as I said, it’s just a guess.
Try to not jump to the conclusion that things you don’t agree with must be an attack.
It says absolutely nothing about mental faculties.Saying someone lacks agency is making assumptions and jumping to conclusions about their mental faculties. How about addressing the constructive criticism instead?
I don't think Apple could or should do anything against stopping them (don't get me wrong, principly I would support this), it also might make claims of their anti-competitive position more valid. So I don't think they want to do it either. I think it is more a task for the government to promote the right to privacy. The GDPR is a pretty good regulation!If they really cared this much they would have trimmed down the amount data these apps are collecting.
View attachment 2514204
Alright, let me get straight to the point ... Why are you all still using iPhones then? It’s always the same complaints, too expensive, too boring, lacking features, the App Store sucks and so on. Same story with Macs.
Alright, let me get straight to the point ... Why are you all still using iPhones then? It’s always the same complaints, too expensive, too boring, lacking features, the App Store sucks and so on. Same story with Macs.
As always, one doesn't decide Android or iOS on the basis of a single criteria.
I don't think your far off, but I think you should consider those blindly accepting everything Apple publishes.Many people do not have agency in their lives over many and varied circumstances.
I say you go Apple. Need to tell it like you see it.Just stop with this nonsense Apple
This is such a sad effort to try to influence opinion in their favor.
The distinction being between telling the truth and telling the Truth. With Apple leveraging the former and not the latter.I say you go Apple. Need to tell it like you see it.
I don't think your far off, but I think you should consider those blindly accepting everything Apple publishes.