Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Explains Why Third-Party Watch Faces Still Aren't Supported on watchOS 10
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
2 more complications than the chronograph, I could go with that 😊, but it's not a big deal for me tbh
The watch face is little more the desktop on your iPhone, laptop or desktop. It doesn’t change the functionality of the watch, it doesn’t mess with the OS, egage privacy and at best allows spaces for pre-approved “complications” to have a micro icon
How would you feel if you could only have a limited number of Desktop pictures?
If I want to buy or make a “timex” of “Swatch” face, why can’t I do it? Is this my watch or Apple’s? If I pay copyright royalties (and Apple will certainly get a cut); what’s the problem?
How would you feel if you could only have a limited number of Desktop pictures?
If I want to buy or make a “timex” of “Swatch” face, why can’t I do it? Is this my watch or Apple’s? If I pay copyright royalties (and Apple will certainly get a cut); what’s the problem?
Apple would gladly take a 30% cut over third party watch face sales, and I’m sure that many people would be willing to buy them still. This seems like a win-win situation but Apple doesn’t allow it for a reason I can’t figure
The sad fact is that the vast majority of third party faces, especially those by individual users, would likely be as ugly as sin. Nobody wants that on the product.
Well it’s very much Apple’s watch but there’s no stopping you using any picture as a watch face
I'm not that worried about more watch faces, but if we could have more options for complications that would solve a lot of my problems. Most of the watch faces I like have a lot of empty space (or poor space management), which I would like to add more complications to, or complications of different sizes.
I disagree. Many watch faces actually perform functions. I think Wayfinder might be the most obvious example. The complications aren't just micro icons, either. Many of them actually display data. For instance, the temperature complication displays the current temperature, the calendar complication displays your next appointment, etc.
From my experience as a current Garmin Epix 2 user and former Watch user, there are hundreds of custom watch face’s available for the Garmin, but they are mostly garbage in my opinion. Many have unique designs, but then suffer from poor graphics and/or usability issues. I’ve downloaded so many, only to end up dumping them shortly afterwards.
I’m not suggesting that if Apple would open up the Watch face to 3rd parties that they would suffer the same issues, but I can see why Apple has hesitated in doing so.
I’m not suggesting that if Apple would open up the Watch face to 3rd parties that they would suffer the same issues, but I can see why Apple has hesitated in doing so.
I agree with you, Face is more than just background. If you want to change the background, you can already do that with "Portrait" face, which use any image (including from your fav website for example) as your watch background. Face is a little more functional, with certain theme, animation, typography, hand designs, layout, etc.
Looks like 3rd party watch faces are not going to be supported any time in the near future.
Either this concept doesn’t make any sense, or that person’s having quite the hectic hour by the looks of it. Maybe if the current time block was highlighted with the hour hand, but even then, a lot of people just…don’t plan out their entire day like this. Not consistently, anyway.
And what if something I spend my time on during the day isn’t represented by one of the provided icons?
Actually, you can see something else if you change the setting "return to clock." It only lasts for an hour max, but I believe that hour resets every time you look.
I can understand Apple want to have quality control with the faces , but we need better Apple ones, the Digital faces are just crap. As a designer I like to make my own face.
This is disappointing to hear. Every year I hope for custom watch faces. Apple could still review them before allowing them in the store.
In short, there is no technical reason why third party watch faces couldn't be allowed.
Why is everyone = particularly Apple - so locked into the mentality that the wrist mounted computer screen can only function as a watch and that all other functionality has to be hidden behind "complications"?
Has it really not occurred to anyone that the screen have set as its primary function something such as a compass or GPS or music console or a myriad of other things?
Yes, this. I'd love to have a face with a big complication like the complications from the X-large face in the middle, and the ability to place 4 other complications in the corners.
Pathetic, Apple.
Many of the watch faces are quite average. Some of them are just abominations.
I honestly thought by this stage we'd have a plethora of decent watch faces to choose from. I'm wearing a mini computer on my wrist, how about making it a bit more funky? How about a Tron face, or Blade Runner? Old school Digital watch design? Or some realistic looking watch stylings?
There are plenty of things they can do, but it seems the folks designing the watch faces aren't interested in pushing the design envelope on the watch.
Many of the watch faces are quite average. Some of them are just abominations.
I honestly thought by this stage we'd have a plethora of decent watch faces to choose from. I'm wearing a mini computer on my wrist, how about making it a bit more funky? How about a Tron face, or Blade Runner? Old school Digital watch design? Or some realistic looking watch stylings?
There are plenty of things they can do, but it seems the folks designing the watch faces aren't interested in pushing the design envelope on the watch.