Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

YUCK!!! Who would ever want to eat at a Quiznos?

The day my iPhone displays a Quiznos menu is the day I buy a BlackBerry!

Maybe you should have read the post my statement was responding to. Besides, some people like Quiznos. Maybe Steve Jobs shouldn't create new stuff at Apple unless EVERYONE approves, including you.

Personally, I encourage you to buy a Blackberry if you don't approve of what the iPhone may have the capability of doing in the future.
 
This would be a lot more useful to me if it didn't just rely on proximity. If I want to order a takeout meal from a restaurant, by the time I'm in range of their Wi-Fi I'm close enough to go in. For it to be a real benefit I would want to be able to order so that it's ready when I get there. I don't mind human interaction, I just don't like waiting.

You can do that now with the "phone" part of the iPhone. ;)
 
I don't see the advantage of using this at a Starbucks or other quick serve establishment.

If I've ordered my drink ahead of time, does that mean it's sitting and waiting for me when I get there? How long has it been sitting? Is it now luke warm or watery from the ice melting? This is the equivalent of a burger under a heat lamp.

Do I have to stand in a line of other phone orderers now to wait for my name to be called? What happens when a majority of people are ordering their drinks this way? How long will the line be? Would it now be quicker to get in the normal line and avoid the phone orderers' line?

What happens if I'm 20 minutes late? Am I entitled to have my drink remade at Starbucks' expense because of my tardiness? This doesn't seem fair to Starbucks. How long will I be waiting for that?

What if I order the drink and have paid for it, but never arrive to pick it up? Am I entitled to a refund at Starbucks' expense, wasting both their time and the cost of the drink?
 
I agree with the evolution of this type of technology. Interactive mobile devices that communicate your personal choices, preferences, and financial transaction etc to the places you physically visit.

Fine. another side of me however tells me that this is a dual edge blade. It takes away from part of the social experience of going out. To some degree I could understand some people would rather not deal with real people and customer service. On the other hand for many this is an integral part of the social experience.

People are becoming that way more and more everyday. I mean you see people walking with heads down typing into blackberries, people eating dinner but not talking to each other instead they are texting. Glad I am not a
teenager or a young adult in this era. What an antisocial era.
 
Apple will own the cell phone market next year...

With 3G and all the other possibilities (Such as Starbucks) Apple's iPhone will soon own the smartphone market. Rimm will be a close second, but the iPhone is vastly superior in processing power and Software developer potential.

No one else is even close to offering what Apple will have with the rumored 3G, dual camera, GPS iPhone 2.0.

Not to mention the huge market share gains that the Mac will get from iPhone users jumping ship from Vista to MacOS.

And no one even talks about the percentage that Apple gets from each AT&T user's monthly iPhone bill.

The future looks very bright for iPhone and Mac users. Finally we get to stop making excuses for why we use Apple...
 
I think the Airport example is the most useful. But depending on if such a system could be standardized, it would be like having your own little kiosk device with you for all relevant information about your location. It would presumably mean Wifi would have to be more prevalent in local stores.

arn

airports would have to change their pay-for internet system most airports have before this would take off in those locatios
 
With 3G and all the other possibilities (Such as Starbucks) Apple's iPhone will soon own the smartphone market. Rimm will be a close second, but the iPhone is vastly superior in processing power and Software developer potential.
Not within a year

No one else is even close to offering what Apple will have with the rumored 3G, dual camera, GPS iPhone 2.0.
Don't believe that

Not to mention the huge market share gains that the Mac will get from iPhone users jumping ship from Vista to MacOS.
Believe there will be some gain (me for one)

And no one even talks about the percentage that Apple gets from each AT&T user's monthly iPhone bill.
Obviously money in the bank for Apple

The future looks very bright for iPhone and Mac users. Finally we get to stop making excuses for why we use Apple...
Indeed it does look bright, not sure why you would need to make excuses though?
 
<b>Part of the Starbucks "experience" is the interaction and banter with the cashier and barista, as you order your drink.</b> I don't see the automated ordering mock-up as an advantage, in this case. Now, if I could place my McDonald's order from my iPhone, without having to endure the drive-thru nightmare, it would be a plus.

I know exactly what you mean. Now if we could use the camera to scan barcodes, at places like Ikea that would be good, I hate queuing at ikea.
 
Being able to buy and pay for your purchase on a phone is the future. You won't have to carry money anymore and as an incentive say the coffee would be discounted if you choose iphone to pay. It could replace a visa card long term. And will be more secure as it could have camera face recognition plus a pin for transactions,

Doesn't have to be position dependent either but that will be an added bonus

This will be huge
 
However, I see this sort of idea as being "obvious", and in the future, I can see people looking back and thinking, "Well this was another one of those obvious patents just handed out to the first company that bothered to apply for it." It's not a great idea. It's more of a natural progression of technology and its application.

I was looking at something a bit similar to this as a iPhone App so yeah i think a lot of people have had the idea at some stage. I can't honestly say i had it well enough before the 13nov2066 to get the patent written and submitted to be able to beat Apple to this one.
 
With 3G and all the other possibilities (Such as Starbucks) Apple's iPhone will soon own the smartphone market. Rimm will be a close second, but the iPhone is vastly superior in processing power and Software developer potential.

No one else is even close to offering what Apple will have with the rumored 3G, dual camera, GPS iPhone 2.0.

I tend to disagree. HTC is a competitor which acts extremely quickly. They don't offer breakthrough developments but their copier machine is faster than the speed of light. They are able to produce great design too, plus their devices are much cheaper than the iPhone and unlocked. Windows Mobile may not be the OS of my choice but it is very flexible and powerful.

So I think, we'll see a development similar to Mac/PC. The iPhone will be a premium product which always is one step ahead of the others. But the masses will buy other devices because they're cheaper and a couple months behind the iPhone they will implement the newest developments.

Then, very likely, Google will enter the market as well with their own OS (which will be offered for free). We all know that Google has great developers as well.

So, Apple better be quick and creative!
 
Are you kidding? I'd be amazed if some of the "baristas" at my local Starbucks could even count to 17! The art of coffee making is lost on most of them.

Maybe some baristas don't give a crap but I can tell you that's not how they all are. I've worked at Starbucks for 5 years and I still care and give my customers a quality beverage every time.

P.S. - Not trying to start an argument but someone has to stick up for us baristas! :)
 
What if I am at a Starbucks at an airport?

I think the idea is not that you will NOT need to log in to any local wi-fi.

Just based on your location info, the phone updates a live feed of available local services, displaying them to you in some unobtrusive way. Sort of like an RSS feed.

Wondering if that means the phone needs to ping back every so often to update location info and/or feeds? Isn't that supposed to drain the battery?

This is cool. Every place that sets up immediately becomes an online store when you're near its Wi-Fi signal. I wouldn't mind walking through a mall and checking stuff out via the iPhone (and avoiding the ever-present-nagging sales people).
 
Beyond the iPhone and into our back pocket

Let me just start off by saying I really love using Apple hardware and have for years. But...

...doesn't this make you sick to your stomach if you are a developer. To me this seems like a BIG reach for Apple to say we are taking control of how any mobile device can seamless interact with other wireless devices. This is not just an iPhone thing. With just a quick read of the patent application it would seem that Apple is attempting to reinvent the wheel or should I say patent it.

Patent Abstract: Systems and methods are provided for personal media devices having the ability to communicate wirelessly, and in particular, communicate wirelessly using a short-range communications protocol (e.g., Wi-Fi and Bluetooth). Such communication provides users of personal media devices with access to several Wi-Fi oriented applications. For example, in one embodiment a personal media device may wirelessly download subscription assets (e.g., podcast) as they become available. In another embodiment, content specific or local to a merchant may be provided to personal media devices that are in wireless communication with a wireless router affiliated with the merchant. For example, if the merchant is a restaurant, the merchant may provide a menu to the personal media device and the user may place an order on his or her media device by selecting items on the menu.

When the smoke clears and you get rid of all the legal speak is this not just location bases web serving triggered via gps, router or rf tagging??? Has this not been going on for awhile. Please tell me I am not the only person out there that has/is worked/working on projects such as this.

Furthermore does this mean that developers will need to start paying royalties to Apple every time another project is developed that does the exact same thing or worse yet every time a transaction is made.


Just my two cents...
 
Appleinsider also touches on this article. It also mentioned places like the Zoo. When I was a child, the (Philadelphia) Zoo had little boxes outside of every animal "habitat." You could then use your little, red, plastic, elephant key to activate the box. A voice - you know, the deep, male voice used in all 1970's and 1980's school films :p - would start talking to explain about the animal.

Fast forward to 2008. Press a button on my iPhone and a voice starts streaming to (and from) my phone. Heck, for the fun of it, they can sample the old recordings. :D

I love this idea (in general, not just the zoo).

People have already done audio podcasts to give alternative views on libraries and museums etc. This would make it a lot more interactive.
 
You're kidding, right? Starbucks is a place to get coffee and socialize with your peers, not the server. My orders have never consisted of anything more than me telling the cashier what I want and a thank you. I'm a friendly person also, but I don't go there to carry on a conversation with the cashier. This would also prevent one from having to stand in line. You would still have to wait, but at least you could go ahead and sit down.

No I disagree. Someone pointed out earlier that human interaction could be at peril with the rise of technology. At my Starbucks I regularly communicate with the manager and his staff. They know me and we interact as humans because I don't see them as the cashier. That's the sad part about all this. I see kids sitting at tables with their parents and the whole time they are either texting or playing video games. That's not my idea of time with the family. I love technology as much as anyone and I think there are great applications to this but the other day when I had a problem with my bank, I had to go into the actual building and speak to a "customer service representative" who solved my issue. Automated voice prompts and my banks online web site could not solve it.

However, I do love my online banking :D
 
That banter is my least favorite part of my starbucks experience. I'm not overpaying for my coffee so that I have to pretend like I care what kind of day someone is having. I love this idea!

Hey hey, trust me. You can tell when one of us are pretending. 75% of us are genuine. I love the regulars who come into my store. I wish I didn't have to charge them.
 
That's the nice thing about living in Seattle, people who really appreciate coffee know that you don't go to starbucks to get it. There are so many great coffee shops here that you can't go a block in a lot of neighborhoods without coming across a good independent coffee shop.
The downside is that after enough years in Seattle you become a coffee snob and have to complain as soon as you go a few miles out of Seattle and can't find a good coffee.

How did it get so big there then? You don't have to live in Seattle to know that their coffee sucks. They even admit to burning it. It smells horrible in Starbucks too, like they're killing the beans.

Many of you guys (not talking about you SPG, you restored my faith in Seattle) are all competing about how friendly your "barista" is. You must have never been to a real coffee shop, ones that appreciate your business, and don't call their employees "baristas." Maybe I'm spoiled too. I can get café con leche in the morning if I want it, but then again I live in Tampa and work in Ybor City. Unfortunately I don't really have the time or the desire to get it :)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.